No free ride to zero-emissions: Simulating a region's need to implement its own zero-emissions vehicle (ZEV) mandate to achieve 2050 GHG targets

The adoption of zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) is limited by a variety of barriers. Some are region-specific (e.g. availability of charging infrastructure) while others are global in nature (e.g. battery prices) where improvements spill over between regions. This study explores regional spillover effects and GHG impacts of strong ZEV-focused policy, specifically the ZEV mandate in place in ten U.S. states (“ZEV States”) which requires automakers to sell a minimum amount of ZEVs each year. We use a dynamic technology adoption model to simulate passenger vehicle sectors in North America, focusing on the case of one small region (British Columbia, covering 0.7% of the market) as potentially free-riding off of ZEV States’ policy (covering 23% of the market). Results indicate that free-ridership is not effective; even with the ZEV mandate driving very high sales in ZEV States, British Columbia cannot achieve significant ZEV adoption without also implementing its own ZEV mandate. Further, for British Columbia to meet its 2050 GHG targets, it may need a ZEV mandate in addition to complementary climate policies—pushing ZEVs to account for 40–93% of new vehicle sales in 2050. In short, regions seeking low-carbon transportation likely need to implement their own stringent policies.

[1]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Improving behavioral realism in hybrid energy-economy models using discrete choice studies of personal transportation decisions , 2005 .

[2]  Jungwoo Shin,et al.  Impact of electric vehicles on existing car usage: A mixed multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model approach , 2012 .

[3]  S. Mühlmeier,et al.  Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany , 2011 .

[4]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Environmental assessment of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using naturalistic drive cycles and vehicle travel patterns: A Michigan case study , 2013 .

[5]  Changzheng Liu,et al.  Analyzing the transition to electric drive vehicles in the U.S. , 2014 .

[6]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies , 2008 .

[7]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Exploring car manufacturers' responses to technology-forcing regulation : The case of California's ZEV mandate , 2015 .

[8]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy , 2017 .

[9]  K. Small,et al.  Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel: The Declining Rebound Effect , 2007, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[10]  John K. Dagsvik,et al.  Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles , 2002 .

[11]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  The Impact of Demographics, Built Environment Attributes, Vehicle Characteristics, and Gasoline Prices on Household Vehicle Holdings and Use , 2009 .

[12]  G. Ewing,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preferences for Clean-Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Experiment , 2000 .

[13]  James D. Gwartney.  Economics: Private and Public Choice , 1976 .

[14]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  How policy can build the plug-in electric vehicle market: Insights from the REspondent-based Preference And Constraints (REPAC) model , 2017 .

[15]  Christopher M. Jones,et al.  Deep carbon reductions in California require electrification and integration across economic sectors , 2013 .

[16]  Tania Del Matto,et al.  Do we have a car for you? Encouraging the uptake of electric vehicles at point of sale , 2017 .

[17]  Simon Shepherd,et al.  Factors affecting future demand for electric vehicles: A model based study , 2012 .

[18]  D. Greene,et al.  Public policy and the transition to electric drive vehicles in the U.S.: The role of the zero emission vehicles mandates , 2014 .

[19]  K. Train,et al.  Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[20]  Paul D. Larson,et al.  Consumer attitudes about electric cars: Pricing analysis and policy implications , 2014 .

[21]  Nigel P. Brandon,et al.  Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system , 2010 .

[22]  G. Kramer,et al.  Technology learning for fuel cells: An assessment of past and potential cost reductions , 2010 .

[23]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[24]  Board on Energy,et al.  Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels , 2013 .

[25]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies , 2011 .

[26]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  The origin of California’s zero emission vehicle mandate , 2008 .

[27]  Jacco Farla,et al.  Electrification of the car - Will the momentum last? : Introduction to the special issue , 2015 .

[28]  E. Brouillat,et al.  Evaluating CO2 reduction policy mixes in the automotive sector , 2015 .

[29]  Jeffery B. Greenblatt,et al.  Modeling California policy impacts on greenhouse gas emissions , 2015 .

[30]  D. Sperling,et al.  California's climate and energy policy for transportation , 2014 .

[31]  Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla.  A Policy Approach to the Environmental Impacts of Technological Lock-In , 2006 .

[32]  Kalai Ramea,et al.  Achieving California's 80% greenhouse gas reduction target in 2050: Technology, policy and scenario analysis using CA-TIMES energy economic systems model , 2015 .

[33]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Evolution of the household vehicle fleet: Anticipating fleet composition, PHEV adoption and GHG emissions in Austin, Texas , 2011 .

[34]  K. Train,et al.  Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns , 1998 .

[35]  R. Fouquet.  Trends in income and price elasticities of transport demand (1850–2010) , 2012 .

[36]  B. Nykvist,et al.  Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles , 2015 .

[37]  J. Sterman,et al.  Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems , 2006 .

[38]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Towards General Equilibrium in a Technology-Rich Model with Empirically Estimated Behavioral Parameters , 2006 .

[39]  Marika Kolbenstvedt,et al.  Electromobility in Norway: Experiences and Opportunities , 2015 .

[40]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[41]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Combining Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches To Energy-Economy Modeling Using Discrete Choice Methods , 2005 .

[42]  Son H. Kim,et al.  Long-term implications of alternative light-duty vehicle technologies for global greenhouse gas emissions and primary energy demands , 2011 .

[43]  Sendhil Mullainathan,et al.  Energy Policy with Externalities and Internalities , 2012 .

[44]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Household demand and willingness to pay for clean vehicles , 2007 .

[45]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles , 2009 .

[46]  Margaret J. Eppstein,et al.  An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2011 .

[47]  Soora Rasouli,et al.  Influence of Social Networks on Latent Choice of Electric Cars: A Mixed Logit Specification Using Experimental Design Data , 2016 .

[48]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  Energy Policies for Passenger Motor Vehicles , 2012 .

[49]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  On the electrification of road transport - Learning rates and price forecasts for hybrid-electric and battery-electric vehicles , 2012 .

[50]  Eckehard Schnieder,et al.  Impact assessment in the automotive industry: mandatory market introduction of alternative powertrain technologies , 2010 .

[51]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Evaluating Plug-in Electric Vehicle Policies in the Context of Long-Term Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals: Comparing 10 Canadian Provinces Using the "PEV Policy Report Card" , 2017 .

[52]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[53]  R. Ozaki,et al.  Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations , 2011 .

[54]  Jarod C. Kelly,et al.  Time-dependent plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging based on national driving patterns and demographics , 2012 .

[55]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Moving beyond alternative fuel hype to decarbonize transportation , 2016, Nature Energy.

[56]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[57]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Picking Winners: Modelling the Costs of Technology-specific Climate Policy in the U.S. Passenger Vehicle Sector , 2017 .

[58]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation , 2008 .

[59]  W. R. Morrow,et al.  The Technology Path to Deep Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cuts by 2050: The Pivotal Role of Electricity , 2012, Science.

[60]  Sonja Gensler,et al.  A Study of the Diffusion of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: An Agent‐Based Modeling Approach* , 2011 .