Visual motion influences locomotion in a treadmill virtual environment

This paper describes the use of a treadmill-based virtual environment (VE) to investigate the influence of visual motion on locomotion. First, we demonstrate that a computer-controlled treadmill coupled with a wide field of view computer graphics display can be used to study interactions between perception and action. Previous work has demonstrated that humans calibrate their visually-directed actions to changing circumstances in their environment. Using a treadmill VE, we show that calibration of action is reflected in the real world as a result of manipulating the relation between the speed of visual flow, presented using computer graphics, and the speed of walking on a treadmill. Second, we extend the methodology in our treadmill VE to investigate an open question involving human gait transitions and show that the speed of visual motion influences the speed at which the gait transition occurs. These results demonstrate both the effectiveness of treadmill-based VEs in simulating the perceptual-motor effects of walking through the real world and the value of such systems in addressing basic perceptual questions that would otherwise be difficult to explore.

[1]  Thomas Banton,et al.  The Perception of Walking Speed in a Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[2]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Krista M. Gigone,et al.  Perception of visual speed while moving. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  A Hreljac,et al.  Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Bruce A. Kay,et al.  Coupling of posture and gait: mode locking and parametric excitation , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  Wallace J. Sadowski,et al.  Nonvisually Guided Locomotion to a Previously Viewed Target in Real and Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[7]  J. Rieser,et al.  Visual Perception and the Guidance of Locomotion without Vision to Previously Seen Targets , 1990, Perception.

[8]  W. Warren,et al.  The dynamics of gait transitions: effects of grade and load. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  B A Kay,et al.  Visual control of posture during walking: functional specificity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Attentional focus influences the walk–run transition in human locomotion , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[11]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[12]  A. Minetti,et al.  The transition between walking and running in humans: metabolic and mechanical aspects at different gradients. , 1994, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[13]  John P. Lewis,et al.  Perceptuomotor adaptation: more than meets the eye , 2002 .

[14]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Anne E. Garing,et al.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  William H. Warren,et al.  Visual Control of Posture During Walking: Functional Specificity , 1996 .

[17]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[19]  K. M. Newell,et al.  Perceived task expectations and the walk-run gait transition , 2002 .