Quantitative analysis of in situ optical diagnostics for inferring particle/aggregate parameters in flames : Implications for soot surface growth and total emissivity

Abstract An in situ particulate diagnostic/analysis technique is outlined based on the Rayleigh-Debye-Gans polydisperse fractal aggregate (RDG/PFA) scattering interpretation of absolute angular light scattering and extinction measurements. Using proper particle refractive index, the proposed data analysis method can quantitatively yield all aggregate parameters (particle volume fraction, f v , fractal dimension, D f , primary particle diameter, d p , particle number density, n p , and aggregate size distribution, pdf( N )) without any prior knowledge about the particle-laden environment. The present optical diagnostic/interpretation technique was applied to two different soot-containing laminar and turbulent ethylene/air nonpremixed flames in order to assess its reliability. The aggregate interpretation of optical measurements yielded D f , d p , and pdf( N ) that are in excellent agreement with ex situ thermophoretic sampling/transmission electron microscope (TS/TEM) observations within experimental uncertainties. However, volume-equivalent single particle models (Rayleigh/Mie) overestimated d p by about a factor of 3, causing an order of magnitude underestimation in n p . Consequently, soot surface areas and growth rates were in error by a factor of 3, emphasizing that aggregation effects need to be taken into account when using optical diagnostics for a reliable understanding of soot formation/evolution mechanism in flames. The results also indicated that total soot emissivities were generally underestimated using Rayleigh analysis (up to 50%), mainly due to the uncertainties in soot refractive indices at infrared wavelengths. This suggests that aggregate considerations may not be essential for reasonable radiation heat transfer predictions from luminous flames because of fortuitous error cancellation, resulting in typically a 10 to 30% net effect.

[1]  Ümit Özgür Köylü,et al.  Optical Properties of Soot in Buoyant Laminar Diffusion Flames , 1994 .

[2]  R. J. Hall,et al.  Fractal properties of soot agglomerates , 1991 .

[3]  T. W. Taylor,et al.  Chemical and Optical Probing of Premixed Methane/Oxygen Flames , 1986 .

[4]  George W. Mulholland,et al.  Light scattering from simulated smoke agglomerates , 1988 .

[5]  D. R. Bach,et al.  Rayleigh Scattering of Ruby-Laser Light by Neutral Gases* , 1968 .

[6]  C. Sorensen,et al.  Light-scattering measurements of monomer size, monomers per aggregate, and fractal dimension for soot aggregates in flames. , 1992, Applied optics.

[7]  D. E. Rosner,et al.  Synthesis and restructuring of inorganic nano-particles in counterflow diffusion flames , 1996 .

[8]  D. E. Rosner,et al.  Fractal Morphology Analysis of Combustion-Generated Aggregates Using Angular Light Scattering and Electron Microscope Images , 1995 .

[9]  R. Botet,et al.  Aggregation and Fractal Aggregates , 1987 .

[10]  G. M. Faeth,et al.  Spectral extinction coefficients of soot aggregates from turbulent diffusion flames , 1996 .

[11]  T. Charalampopoulos,et al.  Agglomerate parameters and fractal dimension of soot using light scattering—effects on surface growth , 1991 .

[12]  H. C. Hottel,et al.  A light-scattering method for soot concentration measurements , 1970 .

[13]  Ümit Özgür Köylü,et al.  Structure of Overfire Soot in Buoyant Turbulent Diffusion Flames at Long Residence Times , 1992 .

[14]  Tiago L. Farias,et al.  Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates , 1995 .

[15]  A. F. Sarofim,et al.  Optical Constants of Soot and Their Application to Heat-Flux Calculations , 1969 .

[16]  C. Megaridis,et al.  Absorption and scattering of light by polydisperse aggregates. , 1991, Applied optics.

[17]  Z. Kam,et al.  Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1998 .

[18]  Ümit Özgür Köylü,et al.  Soot formation in weakly buoyant acetylene-fueled laminar jet diffusion flames burning in air☆☆☆ , 1995 .

[19]  Gerard M. Faeth,et al.  Radiative Properties of Flame-Generated Soot , 1993 .

[20]  S. Harris,et al.  Determination of the Rate Constant for Soot Surface Growth , 1983 .

[21]  Jay P. Gore,et al.  A Study of In Situ Specific Absorption Coefficients of Soot Particles in Laminar Flat Flames , 1993 .

[22]  Nelson P. Bryner,et al.  Comparison of a fractal smoke optics model with light extinction measurements , 1994 .

[23]  J. Kent,et al.  Soot measurements in laminar ethylene diffusion flames , 1982 .

[24]  Ümit Özgür Köylü,et al.  Computational Evaluation of Approximate Rayleigh–Debye–Gans/Fractal-Aggregate Theory for the Absorption and Scattering Properties of Soot , 1995 .

[25]  Robert J. Santoro,et al.  Soot particle measurements in diffusion flames , 1983 .

[26]  Robert J. Santoro,et al.  Aerosol dynamic processes of soot aggregates in a laminar ethene diffusion flame , 1993 .

[27]  Takashi Kashiwagi,et al.  Simultaneous optical measurement of soot volume fraction and temperature in premixed flames , 1994 .

[28]  Ümit Özgür Köylü,et al.  Optical Properties of Overfire Soot in Buoyant Turbulent Diffusion Flames At Long Residence Times , 1994 .