On the interaction between ultrasound and contrast agents during Doppler investigations.

Knowledge of interaction mechanisms between ultrasound (US) and contrast agents (CA) suspended in blood is important for a correct interpretation of clinical investigation results. Experiments performed in different laboratories have shown that, as a consequence of primary radiation force, CA tend to move away from the US transducer. Accordingly, Doppler spectra produced by particles suspended in moving water turn out to be significantly altered from what is theoretically expected. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, an original model describing the bubble dynamics as the outcome of the balance between US radiation force and fluid drag force is validated for the case in which bubbles are suspended in blood. The high fluid viscosity is shown to prevent significant bubble deviations from the unperturbed fluid streamlines so that, in large vessels, a residual spectral distortion may exist only at the highest intensity levels permitted by current regulations. Finally, the relative importance and differences between the effect of primary radiation force and streaming mechanisms that, in principle, could lead to similar effects, are discussed.

[1]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Acoustic properties of ultrasound contrast agents , 1993 .

[2]  Y. Takeuchi,et al.  Industrial use thermoplastic microballoon to mimic the contrast agents and its in-vitro behavior including released gas dynamics , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[3]  J. Wu,et al.  Acoustic streaming generated by a focused Gaussian beam and finite amplitude tonebursts. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  C. Hirsch,et al.  Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. By C. HIRSCH. Wiley. Vol. 1, Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization. 1988. 515 pp. £60. Vol. 2, Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows. 1990, 691 pp. £65. , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  R. Schlief,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between ultrasound echo enhancement and Doppler frequency shift using a pulsatile arterial flow phantom. , 1997, Investigative radiology.

[6]  N. Grenier,et al.  Doppler frequency shift and time‐domain velocity enhancement induced by an ultrasonographic contrast agent. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  Carl Eckart,et al.  Vortices and Streams Caused by Sound Waves , 1948 .

[8]  F Forsberg,et al.  Artifacts in ultrasonic contrast agent studies. , 1994, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  V. Michelassi,et al.  Doppler spectra from contrast agents crossing an ultrasound field , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Spectral broadening in conventional and harmonic Doppler measurements with gaseous contrast agents , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[11]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  C. Hartley,et al.  Characteristics of acoustic streaming created and measured by pulsed Doppler ultrasound , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Jens M. Hovem,et al.  Non-linear acoustics , 1977 .

[14]  V F Humphrey,et al.  An experimental investigation of streaming in pulsed diagnostic ultrasound beams. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  D. Nassiri,et al.  Measurement of acoustic streaming using magnetic resonance. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Dynamic Effects of Acoustic Radiation Force on Microbubbles , 2002 .

[17]  C. Chin,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  Harald Becher,et al.  Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography , 2000, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[19]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Do ultrasonic contrast agents artificially increase maximum Doppler shift? In vivo study of human common carotid arteries. , 1998, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[20]  T. Leighton The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .

[21]  K. Beller,et al.  Arterial parameters under echo contrast enhancement , 1997 .

[22]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.