Prevalence of myopic maculopathy in the German population: results from the Gutenberg health study

Aims To determine the prevalence of myopic maculopathy in the general population in Germany and to analyse potential associations with ocular and systemic factors. Design The Gutenberg Health Study is a population-based study, including 15 010 participants aged 35–74 years. Methods Myopic maculopathy was graded in phakic eyes with spherical equivalent ≤−6 D by assessing fundus photographs according to a recent international photographic classification system (META-PM). 801 eyes of 519 participants (mean age 51.0±0.77 years) met the conditions and had gradable fundus photographs. Age-specific prevalence estimates were computed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess associated factors with myopic maculopathy. Results Myopic maculopathy was present in 10.3% (95% CI 7.9 to 13.3) study participants. The prevalence was 8.6% (95% CI 6.1% to 11.9%) in the 397 right eyes and 8.7% (95% CI 6.2% to 12.0%) in the 404 left eyes. The most common type of pathology was diffuse atrophy (8.1%), followed by patchy atrophy (1.3%) and macular atrophy (0.5%); plus lesions were present in 3% (right eyes). Age (OR 1.07 per year, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11, p<0.001), higher myopic refractive error (p<0.001), and male gender (p=0.02) were associated with myopic maculopathy, while cardiovascular risk factors and socioeconomic factors were not. Conclusions The prevalence of myopic maculopathy in the German population was 0.5%, and 10% in high myopic participants, aged 35–74 years. These population-based data are the first in Europe. Myopic maculopathy was related to severity of myopic refractive error and age.

[1]  C. Jin,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND VISUAL ACUITY OF HIGHLY MYOPIC EYES WITH DIFFERENT SEVERITIES OF MYOPIC MACULOPATHY. , 2020, Retina.

[2]  C. Klaver,et al.  Genetic variants linked to myopic macular degeneration in persons with high myopia: CREAM Consortium , 2019, PloS one.

[3]  J. Ruiz-Moreno,et al.  Myopic maculopathy: Current status and proposal for a new classification and grading system (ATN) , 2019, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[4]  J. Jonas,et al.  IMI – Defining and Classifying Myopia: A Proposed Set of Standards for Clinical and Epidemiologic Studies , 2019, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Pei Ying Lee,et al.  Distribution and Severity of Myopic Maculopathy Among Highly Myopic Eyes. , 2018, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  T. Wong,et al.  Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Myopic Macular Degeneration on Visual Impairment and Functioning Among Adults in Singapore. , 2018, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Ningli Wang,et al.  Cycloplegic refraction by 1% cyclopentolate in young adults: is it the gold standard? The Anyang University Students Eye Study (AUSES) , 2018, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[8]  J. Jonas,et al.  Progression of Myopic Maculopathy during 18-Year Follow-up. , 2018, Ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Jonas,et al.  Ten-Year Progression of Myopic Maculopathy: The Beijing Eye Study 2001-2011. , 2018, Ophthalmology.

[10]  R. Klein,et al.  Prevalence and Characteristics of Myopic Degeneration in an Adult Chinese American Population: The Chinese American Eye Study. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Seang-Mei Saw,et al.  Epidemiology of Pathologic Myopia in Asia and Worldwide , 2016, Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  Naomie Warner Update on myopia , 2016, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[13]  F. Lum,et al.  The Prevalence of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization in the United States: Analysis of the IRIS(®) Data Registry and NHANES. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[14]  S. Uzun,et al.  Myopic Maculopathy and Optic Disc Changes in Highly Myopic Young Asian Eyes and Impact on Visual Acuity. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Kyoko Ohno-Matsui,et al.  Current and predicted demographics of high myopia and an update of its associated pathological changes , 2015, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  Tien Yin Wong,et al.  International photographic classification and grading system for myopic maculopathy. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  The Ophthalmic Branch of the Gutenberg Health Study: Study Design, Cohort Profile and Self-Reported Diseases , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  Shih-Jen Chen,et al.  Systolic blood pressure, choroidal thickness, and axial length in patients with myopic maculopathy , 2014, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.

[19]  N. Jacobsen,et al.  Genetic and environmental effects on myopia development and progression , 2014, Eye.

[20]  P. Foster,et al.  Epidemiology of myopia , 2014, Eye.

[21]  S. Chiou,et al.  Prevalence and associated risk factors of myopic maculopathy in elderly Chinese: the Shihpai eye study. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  M. Blettner,et al.  Die Gutenberg Gesundheitsstudie , 2012, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[23]  Haitao Li,et al.  The types and severity of high myopic maculopathy in Chinese patients , 2012, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  Y. Low,et al.  Dietary factors, myopia, and axial dimensions in children. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[25]  W D Flanders,et al.  Case-only design to measure gene-gene interaction. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[26]  W. Ahrens,et al.  Control response proportions in population-based case-control studies in Germany. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[27]  Qiang Wu,et al.  Population-based survey of prevalence, causes, and risk factors for blindness and visual impairment in an aging Chinese metropolitan population. , 2017, International journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  J. Jonas,et al.  Myopic maculopathy imaged by optical coherence tomography: the beijing eye study. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[29]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[30]  T. Lampert,et al.  Messung des sozioökonomischen Status in der Studie „Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell“ (GEDA) , 2012, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.