Host Country Resource Availability and Information System Control Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations: An Empirical Test of Resource Dependence Theory

The management of the information systems (IS) function is a complex task, particularly in the case of multinational corporations (MNCs), where installations dispersed across distance, time, and cultures can lead to diverse and incompatible systems spreading among foreign subsidiaries. The need to globally control and coordinate the IS management function is often met with resistance from local IS managers, who may perceive corporate standards as intrusive. Resource dependence theory (RDT) argues that control is made easier when a subsidiary unit is dependent on corporate headquarters for critical resources. This study examined the IS management relationship and the use of various mechanisms of control (formal and informal) between 54 headquarters-subsidiary pairs spread across 19 countries of varying resource-richness. While RDT appears to be valid when subsidiaries are dependent on MNC headquarters for resources, the expected relationship between the mechanisms and host country IS resource availability was not observed. Although there was a significant relationship with the use of informal mechanisms and IS resources, it was in the opposite direction to what would be expected by RDT.

[1]  B. Loasby.  The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[2]  Waymond Rodgers,et al.  Stakeholder influence on corporate strategies over time , 2004 .

[3]  John Child,et al.  Strategies of Control and Organizational Behavior , 1973 .

[4]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[5]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  Controlled variety: A challenge for human resource management in the MNC , 1986 .

[7]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Internal differentiation within multinational corporations , 1989 .

[8]  Arnold S. Tannenbaum,et al.  Organizational Control Structure , 1963 .

[9]  Rajiv P. Dant,et al.  Contractibility and Ownership Redirection in Franchising:A Property Rights View , 2006 .

[10]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Dependency and Vulnerability: An Exchange Approach to the Control of Organizations. , 1974 .

[11]  David Cray,et al.  Control and Coordination in Multinational Corporations , 1984 .

[12]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[13]  Mona V. Makhija,et al.  Measuring Globalization of Industries Using a National Industry Approach: Empirical Evidence Across Five Countries and over Time , 1997 .

[14]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Power and Tactics in Bargaining , 1981 .

[15]  David A. Ricks,et al.  Multinational Parent Companies’ Influence over Human Resource Decisions of Affiliates: U.S. Firms in Mexico , 1989 .

[16]  V. Grover,et al.  Decisions to Outsource Information Systems Functions: Testing a Strategy‐Theoretic Discrepancy Model , 1995 .

[17]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Competing with flexible lateral organizations , 1993 .

[18]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[19]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations. , 1977 .

[20]  W. Ouchi,et al.  Organizational Control: Two Functions. , 1975 .

[21]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Henry L. Tosi.  The organizational control structure , 1983 .

[23]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Reengineering Effectiveness and the Redesign of Organizational Control: A Case Study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  J. Taggart.  Multinational manufacturing subsidiaries in Scotland: Strategic role and economic impact , 1996 .

[26]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  INNOVATION IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: CONTROL AND COMMUNICATION PATTERNS IN INTERNATIONAL R&D OPERATIONS , 1998 .

[27]  J. Jarillo,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[28]  R. M. Durand,et al.  Some Precautions in Using Canonical Analysis , 1975 .

[29]  William G. Egelhoff.  Patterns of Control in U.S., UK and European Multinational Corporations , 1984 .

[30]  Kendall Roth,et al.  The effectiveness of headquarters-subsidiary relationships: The role of coordination, control, and conflict , 1992 .

[31]  E. Lawler,et al.  Commitment in exchange relations : test of a theory of relational cohesion , 1996 .

[32]  G. PITT-RIVERS.  Human Ecology , 1936, Nature.

[33]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[34]  Tiziana Casciaro,et al.  Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory , 2005 .

[35]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1995 .

[36]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[37]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  J. Taggart,et al.  Autonomy and Procedural Justice: A Framework for Evaluating Subsidiary Strategy , 1997 .

[39]  Alissa R Sherry,et al.  Conducting and Interpreting Canonical Correlation Analysis in Personality Research: A User-Friendly Primer , 2005, Journal of personality assessment.

[40]  John Leslie King,et al.  A Representational Scheme for Analyzing Information Technology and Organizational Dependency , 2002, MIS Q..

[41]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Patterns of Strategic Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1984 .

[42]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Designing global strategies: profiting from operation flexibility , 1986 .

[43]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[44]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Changing Patterns of International Competition , 1986 .

[45]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .