Hybrid broadband ground motion simulation validation of small magnitude earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand

Ground motion simulation validation is an important and necessary task toward establishing the efficacy of physics-based ground motion simulations for seismic hazard analysis and earthquake engineering applications. This article presents a comprehensive validation of the commonly used Graves and Pitarka hybrid broadband ground motion simulation methodology with a recently developed three-dimensional (3D) Canterbury Velocity Model. This is done through simulation of 148 small magnitude earthquake events in the Canterbury, New Zealand, region in order to supplement prior validation efforts directed at several larger magnitude events. Recent empirical ground motion models are also considered to benchmark the simulation predictive capability, which is examined by partitioning the prediction residuals into the various components of ground motion variability. Biases identified in source, path, and site components suggest that improvements to the predictive capabilities of the simulation methodology can be made by using a longer high-frequency path duration model, reducing empirical Vs30-based low-frequency site amplification, and utilizing site-specific velocity models in the high-frequency simulations.

[1]  Fabrice Hollender,et al.  Earthquake Ground Motion in the Mygdonian Basin, Greece: The E2VP Verification and Validation of 3D Numerical Simulation up to 4 Hz , 2015 .

[2]  C. Kesselman,et al.  CyberShake: A Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Model for Southern California , 2011 .

[3]  Robin L. Lee,et al.  Modeling nonlinear site effects in physics-based ground motion simulations of the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence , 2020 .

[4]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  A Comparison of Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Arias Intensity and Cumulative Absolute Velocity Developed Using a Consistent Database and Functional Form , 2012 .

[5]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Soil profile characterisation of Christchurch Central Business District strong motion stations , 2015 .

[6]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Systematic Ground Motion Observations in the Canterbury Earthquakes and Region-Specific Non-Ergodic Empirical Ground Motion Modeling , 2015 .

[7]  Peter J. Stafford,et al.  Crossed and Nested Mixed-Effects Approaches for Enhanced Model Development and Removal of the Ergodic Assumption in Empirical Ground-Motion Models , 2014 .

[8]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  A New Zealand‐Specific Pseudospectral Acceleration Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation for Active Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on Foreign Models , 2013 .

[9]  A. Kaiser,et al.  Stress Release and Source Scaling of the 2010–2011 Canterbury, New Zealand Earthquake Sequence from Spectral Inversion of Ground Motion Data , 2014, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[10]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  Strong Correlation between Stress Drop and Peak Ground Acceleration for Recent M 1-4 Earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2018 .

[11]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Validation of the SCEC Broadband Platform V14.3 Simulation Methods Using Pseudospectral Acceleration Data , 2015 .

[12]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Near-source Strong Ground Motions Observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake , 2011 .

[13]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  3D models of Quaternary-aged sedimentary successions within the Canterbury, New Zealand region , 2017 .

[14]  David M. Boore,et al.  Revisions to Some Parameters Used in Stochastic‐Method Simulations of Ground Motion , 2015 .

[15]  Keli Cheng,et al.  Evaluation of the southern California seismic velocity models through simulation of recorded events , 2016 .

[16]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Broadband Ground‐Motion Simulation of the 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquake , 2018, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[17]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  Kinematic Ground‐Motion Simulations on Rough Faults Including Effects of 3D Stochastic Velocity Perturbations , 2016 .

[18]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  Ground-Motion Attenuation Model for Small-To-Moderate Shallow Crustal Earthquakes in California and Its Implications on Regionalization of Ground-Motion Prediction Models , 2010 .

[19]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA Ground-Motion Relations , 2008 .

[20]  K. Campbell,et al.  NGA-West2 Ground Motion Model for the Average Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped Linear Acceleration Response Spectra , 2014 .

[21]  Arthur Frankel,et al.  Model and Parametric Uncertainty in Source-Based Kinematic Models of Earthquake Ground Motion , 2011 .

[22]  Tam Larkin,et al.  Hard‐Site κ0 (Kappa) Calculations for Christchurch, New Zealand, and Comparison with Local Ground‐Motion Prediction Models , 2014 .

[23]  Adrian Rodriguez-Marek,et al.  Analysis of Single-Station Standard Deviation Using the KiK-net Data , 2011 .

[24]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Amplification of strong ground motions at Heathcote Valley during the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes: The role of 2D nonlinear site response , 2017 .

[25]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Development of a 3D Velocity Model of the Canterbury, New Zealand, Region for Broadband Ground‐Motion SimulationDevelopment of a 3D Velocity Model of the Canterbury, New Zealand, Region , 2017 .

[26]  David M. Boore,et al.  Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method , 2003 .

[27]  Liam Wotherspoon,et al.  DYNAMIC SITE CHARACTERIZATION OF CHRISTCHURCH STRONG MOTION STATIONS , 2011 .

[28]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Guidance on the Utilization of Earthquake-Induced Ground Motion Simulations in Engineering Practice , 2017 .

[29]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Broadband ground motion simulation of the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence , 2016 .

[30]  Ralph J. Archuleta,et al.  UCSB Method for Simulation of Broadband Ground Motion from Kinematic Earthquake Sources , 2015 .

[31]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Geotechnical characterization of Christchurch strong motion stations , 2013 .

[32]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Hybrid Broadband Ground-Motion Simulations : Combining Long-Period Deterministic Synthetics with High-Frequency Multiple StoS Backscattering , 2010 .

[33]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  The SCEC Broadband Platform Validation Exercise: Methodology for Code Validation in the Context of Seismic‐Hazard Analyses , 2015 .

[34]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  The ShakeOut Scenario: A Hypothetical Mw7.8 Earthquake on the Southern San Andreas Fault , 2011 .

[35]  Richard H. Sibson,et al.  Stress Control of an Evolving Strike-Slip Fault System during the 2010–2011 Canterbury, New Zealand, Earthquake Sequence , 2011 .

[36]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Ground motion simulations of great earthquakes on the Alpine Fault: effect of hypocentre location and comparison with empirical modelling , 2017 .

[37]  Tam Larkin,et al.  REFERENCE STATIONS FOR CHRISTCHURCH , 2012 .

[38]  A Pitarka,et al.  Refinements to the Graves and Pitarka (2010) Broadband GroundMotion Simulation Method , 2017 .

[39]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Physically Parameterized Prediction Equations for Significant Duration in Active Crustal Regions , 2016 .

[40]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  The SDSU Broadband Ground‐Motion Generation Module BBtoolbox Version 1.5 , 2015 .

[41]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Simulations of Ground Motion in the Los Angeles Basin Based upon the Spectral-Element Method , 2004 .

[42]  K. Olsen,et al.  Ground motion simulation and validation of the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake in scattering media , 2019, Geophysical Journal International.

[43]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Implementation and Validation of EXSIM (A Stochastic Finite‐Fault Ground‐Motion Simulation Algorithm) on the SCEC Broadband Platform , 2015 .

[44]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Validation of Duration Parameters from SCEC Broadband Platform Simulated Ground Motions , 2016 .

[45]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Methodology and computational implementation of a New Zealand Velocity Model (NZVM2.0) for broadband ground motion simulation , 2020, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics.

[46]  David M. Boore,et al.  Path Durations for Use in the Stochastic‐Method Simulation of Ground Motions , 2014 .

[47]  Walter Imperatori,et al.  Validation of 3D Velocity Models Using Earthquakes with Shallow Slip: Case Study of the 2014 Mw 6.0 South Napa, California, Event , 2017 .

[48]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Ground‐Motion Observations from the 14 November 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand, Earthquake and Insights from Broadband Simulations , 2017 .

[49]  Jacobo Bielak,et al.  Ground‐Motion Simulation and Validation of the 2008 Chino Hills, California, Earthquake , 2013 .

[50]  Stephen Bannister,et al.  Establishing a Versatile 3-D Seismic Velocity Model for New Zealand , 2010 .

[51]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Introduction to the Focus Section on Validation of the SCEC Broadband Platform V14.3 Simulation Methods , 2015 .

[52]  Ken Gledhill,et al.  Evolution of the 2010–2012 Canterbury earthquake sequence , 2012 .

[53]  A. Pitarka,et al.  Broadband Ground-Motion Simulation Using a Hybrid Approach , 2010 .

[54]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The Variability of Ground-Motion Prediction Models and Its Components , 2010 .

[55]  John Ristau,et al.  Implementation of Routine Regional Moment Tensor Analysis in New Zealand , 2008 .

[56]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[57]  W. Silva,et al.  NGA-West2 Database , 2014 .