Search and selection in human vision: psychological evidence and computational implications

[1]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Parallel Visual Coding in Three Dimensions , 1994, Perception.

[4]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[5]  H. J. Muller,et al.  SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  A model for the rapid interpretation of line drawings in early vision , 1993 .

[7]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. Watt.  Visual Processing: Computational Psychophysical and Cognitive Research , 1990 .

[11]  S. Yantis,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[13]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[15]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[17]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[19]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[20]  S Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  J. Townsend.  SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[24]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  The Neuropsychology of High-Level Vision , 1994 .

[25]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Issues of representation in object vision , 1994 .

[26]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Search via recursive rejection (SERR): visual search for single and dual form-conjunction targets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  On the perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.