Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work

Conclusions about the validity of cognitive ability and personality measures based on meta-analyses published mostly in the past decade are reviewed at the beginning of this article. Research on major issues in selection that affect the use and interpretation of validation data are then discussed. These major issues include the dimensionality of personality, the nature and magnitude of g in cognitive ability measures, conceptualizations of validity, the nature of the job performance domain, trade-offs between diversity and validity, reactions to selection procedures, faking on personality measures, mediator and moderator research on test–performance relationships, multilevel issues, Web-based testing, the situational framing of test stimuli, and the context in which selection occurs.

[1]  Huy Le,et al.  Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: testing a new meta-analytic procedure. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[2]  W. Borman,et al.  Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability , 2002 .

[3]  Fritz Drasgow,et al.  UNPROCTORED INTERNET TESTING IN EMPLOYMENT SETTINGS , 2006 .

[4]  Anna Brown,et al.  Online Testing: Mode of Administration and the Stability of Opq 32i Scores , 2004 .

[5]  Paul A. Westrick,et al.  Too much of a good thing: curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Applicant Reactions in Selection: Comprehensive Meta-Analysis into Reaction Generalization Versus Situational Specificity , 2010 .

[7]  Robert P. Tett,et al.  Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). , 2007 .

[8]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Kenneth G. Brown,et al.  HR professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. , 2002 .

[10]  F. Lievens,et al.  Pareto-Optimal Predictor Composite Formation: A Complementary Approach to Alleviating the Selection Quality/Adverse Impact Dilemma , 2008 .

[11]  M. Mount,et al.  Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: a meta-analysis. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Validity of Customer Service Measures in Personnel Selection: A Review of Criterion and Construct Evidence , 1998 .

[13]  Thomas A. O’Neill,et al.  Predicting workplace deviance using broad versus narrow personality variables , 2009 .

[14]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  WEB‐BASED AND PAPER‐AND‐PENCIL TESTING OF APPLICANTS IN A PROCTORED SETTING: ARE PERSONALITY, BIODATA, AND SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS COMPARABLE? , 2003 .

[15]  A. Ryan,et al.  Methods for Correcting for Faking , 2011 .

[16]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  A META-ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONAL REASONING TESTS OF AGGRESSION , 2010 .

[17]  N. Christiansen,et al.  Correcting Personality Tests for Faking: A Review of Popular Personality Tests and an Initial Survey of Researchers , 2003 .

[18]  Christopher M. Berry,et al.  Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: a qualitative and quantitative review. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  A. Ryan,et al.  APPLICANT WITHDRAWAL: THE ROLE OF TEST‐TAKING ATTITUDES AND RACIAL DIFFERENCES , 1997 .

[20]  D. Organ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time , 1997 .

[21]  Daniel A. Newman,et al.  Recruitment efforts to reduce adverse impact: targeted recruiting for personality, cognitive ability, and diversity. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Dan J. Putka,et al.  Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Tamera L. McKinniss,et al.  Using Narrow Facets of an Integrity Test to Predict Safety: A Test Validation Study , 2009 .

[24]  Silvia Moscoso,et al.  Internet-based Personality Testing: Equivalence of Measures and Assesses' Perceptions and Reactions , 2003 .

[25]  Stuart M. Keeley,et al.  Asking the Right Questions , 1981 .

[26]  Rose A. Mueller-Hanson,et al.  Adaptive Performance and Trainability as Criteria in Selection Research , 2012 .

[27]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  3 Staffing Twenty‐first‐century Organizations , 2008 .

[28]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  THE DIVERSITY–VALIDITY DILEMMA: STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING RACIOETHNIC AND SEX SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES AND ADVERSE IMPACT IN SELECTION , 2008 .

[29]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures , 2006 .

[30]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Emergence of the Human Capital Resource: A Multilevel Model , 2011 .

[31]  John A. Weiner,et al.  Unproctored Online Testing: Environmental Conditions and Validity , 2009, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[32]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Acquiring and Developing Human Capital in Service Contexts: The Interconnectedness of Human Capital Resources , 2011 .

[33]  M. Ashton,et al.  Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  M. Brannick,et al.  Improving Prediction of Work Performance Through Frame-of-Reference Consistency: Empirical Evidence Using Openness to Experience , 2010 .

[35]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  T. Mitchell,et al.  The Conditional Reasoning Measurement System for Aggression: An Overview , 2004, Human Performance.

[37]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Lang, J. W. B, Kersting, M., Hülsheger, U. R. & Lang, J. (2010). General mental ability, narrower cognitive abilities, and job performance: The perspective of the nested-factors model of cognitive abilities , 2012 .

[38]  T. Judge,et al.  Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  T. Judge,et al.  IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT IN ORGANIZATIONAL SETTINGS , 2007 .

[40]  N. Tippins Internet Alternatives to Traditional Proctored Testing: Where Are We Now? , 2009, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[41]  M. Schmit,et al.  Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. , 1995 .

[42]  N. Schmitt The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection , 2012 .

[43]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL STAFFING: A MULTILEVEL REVIEW, SYNTHESIS, AND MODEL , 2004 .

[44]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  J. Carroll Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .

[46]  Jason L. Huang,et al.  BEYOND PERSONALITY TRAITS: A STUDY OF PERSONALITY STATES AND SITUATIONAL CONTINGENCIES IN CUSTOMER SERVICE JOBS , 2011 .

[47]  In-Sue Oh,et al.  INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF PERCEPTUAL SPEED AND ACCURACY OVER GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY , 2008 .

[48]  Jill C. Bradley,et al.  The big five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Designing Pareto-optimal selection systems: formalizing the decisions required for selection system development. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Dan J. Putka,et al.  The Concept of Validity and the Process of Validation , 2012 .

[51]  M. Donnellan,et al.  Evaluating the Evidence for the General Factor of Personality across Multiple Inventories. , 2011, Journal of research in personality.

[52]  M. Born,et al.  Intentional response distortion on personality tests: using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  D. D. Steiner Personnel Selection across the Globe , 2012 .

[54]  Test of slope and intercept bias in college admissions: a response to Aguinis, Culpepper, and Pierce (2010). , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  F. Drasgow,et al.  Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Pairwise Preference Items , 2012 .

[56]  L. Hough The 'Big Five' Personality Variables--Construct Confusion: Description Versus Prediction , 1992 .

[57]  Bernd Marcus,et al.  Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Typical and Maximum Managerial Performance , 2007 .

[58]  Alexa A. Perryman,et al.  Effects of selection and training on unit-level performance over time: a latent growth modeling approach. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDATION OF SELECTION PROCEDURES: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE , 2008 .

[60]  Frederick L. Oswald,et al.  They're Right, Well ... Mostly Right: Research Evidence and an Agenda to Rescue Personality Testing From 1960s Insights , 2005 .

[61]  Todd E Bodner,et al.  Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[62]  Ingrid Kurz A look into the “black box” , 1994 .

[63]  Bennett E. Postlethwaite,et al.  A matter of context: A meta‐analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. , 2012 .

[64]  P. Sackett,et al.  Differential prediction and the use of multiple predictors: the omitted variables problem. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[65]  A. Neubauer,et al.  Broad and narrow personality traits for predicting managerial success , 2010 .

[66]  Richard G. Gardner,et al.  The Five-factor Model of Personality Traits and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: a Meta-analysis Unresolved Issues regarding Citizenship and Personality , 2022 .

[67]  V. Catano,et al.  Using Measures Of Specific Abilities To Predict Training Performance in Canadian Forces Operator Occupations , 2004 .

[68]  Huy Le,et al.  Increasing the Accuracy of Corrections for Range Restriction: Implications for Selection Procedure Validities and Other Research Results , 2006 .

[69]  F. Drasgow,et al.  Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. , 1993 .

[70]  Eric D. Heggestad,et al.  Personality retesting for managing intentional distortion. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[71]  J. Flynn,et al.  Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments. , 2012, The American psychologist.

[72]  F. Lievens,et al.  Selecting Predictor Subsets: Considering Validity and Adverse Impact , 2010 .

[73]  John P. Hausknecht,et al.  Retesting in selection: a meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[74]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  General and Specific Cognitive and Psychomotor Abilities in Personnel Selection: The Prediction of Training and Job Performance , 2000 .

[75]  Charles A. Scherbaum,et al.  Validation Is Like Motor Oil: Synthetic Is Better , 2010, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[76]  L. A. Witt,et al.  The Interactive Effects of Extraversion and Conscientiousness on Performance , 2002 .

[77]  Neil Anderson,et al.  INTERNATIONAL VALIDITY GENERALIZATION OF GMA AND COGNITIVE ABILITIES: A EUROPEAN COMMUNITY META-ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[78]  Jinyan Fan,et al.  Testing the efficacy of a new procedure for reducing faking on personality tests within selection contexts. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[79]  L. Thurstone Primary mental abilities. , 1938, Science.

[80]  A. Ryan,et al.  Applicant self-selection: correlates of withdrawal from a multiple hurdle process. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[81]  Jeff W. Johnson,et al.  VALIDATING SYNTHETIC VALIDATION: COMPARING TRADITIONAL AND SYNTHETIC VALIDITY COEFFICIENTS , 2010 .

[82]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Ability-personality interactions when predicting job performance , 1998 .

[83]  J. Farr,et al.  Handbook of employee selection , 2010 .

[84]  Counterproductive Work Behavior and Withdrawal , 2010 .

[85]  Ronald S. Landis,et al.  The Effects of Cognitive Ability and Conscientiousness on Performance Over Time: A Censored Latent Growth Model , 2007 .

[86]  D. Ones,et al.  Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: a review and meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[87]  P. Sackett,et al.  Correction for range restriction: an expanded typology. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[88]  Brian J. Hoffman,et al.  A Review of Citizenship and Counterproductive Behaviors in Organizational Decision-Making , 2012 .

[89]  Philip L. Roth,et al.  Toward Better Meta-Analytic Matrices: How Input Values Can Affect Research Conclusions in Human Resource Management Simulations , 2011 .

[90]  Anthony J. Nyberg,et al.  Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[91]  Tamera L. McKinniss,et al.  The moderation of conscientiousness by cognitive ability when predicting workplace safety behavior , 2009 .

[92]  Anton J. Villado,et al.  Unproctored Internet-Based Tests of Cognitive Ability and Personality: Magnitude of Cheating and Response Distortion , 2009, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[93]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Linearity of Personality–Performance Relationships: A Large-Scale Examination , 2010 .

[94]  Mary Anne Taylor,et al.  Broad Versus Narrow Facets of Integrity: Predictive Validity and Subgroup Differences , 2005 .

[95]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. , 1993 .

[96]  Kenneth J. Harris,et al.  P = f (Conscientiousness × Ability): Examining the Facets of Conscientiousness , 2010 .

[97]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[98]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? , 2001 .

[99]  W. Coward,et al.  Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. , 1990 .

[100]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[101]  Ning Li,et al.  The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior: The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics , 2012 .

[102]  David P. Lepak,et al.  How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms , 2012 .

[103]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Validity of General Mental Ability for the Prediction of Job Performance and Training Success in Germany: A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[104]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Combining predictors to achieve optimal trade-offs between selection quality and adverse impact. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[105]  John C. Scott,et al.  Web-Based Assessments , 2012 .

[106]  K. Murphy,et al.  Can Changes in Differential Dropout Rates Reduce Adverse Impact? A Computer Simulation Study of a Multi‐wave Selection System , 2004 .

[107]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  A Monte Carlo Comparison of Relative Importance Methodologies , 2004 .

[108]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Nature and Use of Personality in Selection , 2012 .

[109]  Patrick H. Raymark,et al.  The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[110]  F. Lievens,et al.  Instruments for personnel selection in the 21st century: research and practice , 2011 .

[111]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS , 2007 .

[112]  Joyce Hogan,et al.  Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[113]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. , 1979 .

[114]  N. Schmitt,et al.  The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[115]  R. Dalal A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[116]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research , 2004 .

[117]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Why Don't Measures of Broad Dimensions of Personality Perform Better As Predictors of Job Performance? , 2005 .

[118]  Dan J. Putka,et al.  Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[119]  Neil Anderson,et al.  A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[120]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[121]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  A meta‐analytic investigation into the moderating effects of situational strength on the conscientiousness–performance relationship , 2009 .

[122]  Lisa M. Penney,et al.  A review of personality and performance: Identifying boundaries, contingencies, and future research directions , 2011 .

[123]  M. Ziegler,et al.  New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. , 2011 .

[124]  J. Nijenhuis,et al.  The General Factor of Personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study , 2010 .

[125]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests , 1997 .

[126]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .