Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Huy Le,et al. Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: testing a new meta-analytic procedure. , 2006, Psychological methods.
[2] W. Borman,et al. Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability , 2002 .
[3] Fritz Drasgow,et al. UNPROCTORED INTERNET TESTING IN EMPLOYMENT SETTINGS , 2006 .
[4] Anna Brown,et al. Online Testing: Mode of Administration and the Stability of Opq 32i Scores , 2004 .
[5] Paul A. Westrick,et al. Too much of a good thing: curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.
[6] Ute R. Hülsheger,et al. Applicant Reactions in Selection: Comprehensive Meta-Analysis into Reaction Generalization Versus Situational Specificity , 2010 .
[7] Robert P. Tett,et al. Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). , 2007 .
[8] Suzanne T Bell,et al. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.
[9] Kenneth G. Brown,et al. HR professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. , 2002 .
[10] F. Lievens,et al. Pareto-Optimal Predictor Composite Formation: A Complementary Approach to Alleviating the Selection Quality/Adverse Impact Dilemma , 2008 .
[11] M. Mount,et al. Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: a meta-analysis. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.
[12] Michael A. McDaniel,et al. Validity of Customer Service Measures in Personnel Selection: A Review of Criterion and Construct Evidence , 1998 .
[13] Thomas A. O’Neill,et al. Predicting workplace deviance using broad versus narrow personality variables , 2009 .
[14] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. WEB‐BASED AND PAPER‐AND‐PENCIL TESTING OF APPLICANTS IN A PROCTORED SETTING: ARE PERSONALITY, BIODATA, AND SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS COMPARABLE? , 2003 .
[15] A. Ryan,et al. Methods for Correcting for Faking , 2011 .
[16] Paul R. Sackett,et al. A META-ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONAL REASONING TESTS OF AGGRESSION , 2010 .
[17] N. Christiansen,et al. Correcting Personality Tests for Faking: A Review of Popular Personality Tests and an Initial Survey of Researchers , 2003 .
[18] Christopher M. Berry,et al. Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: a qualitative and quantitative review. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.
[19] A. Ryan,et al. APPLICANT WITHDRAWAL: THE ROLE OF TEST‐TAKING ATTITUDES AND RACIAL DIFFERENCES , 1997 .
[20] D. Organ. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time , 1997 .
[21] Daniel A. Newman,et al. Recruitment efforts to reduce adverse impact: targeted recruiting for personality, cognitive ability, and diversity. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.
[22] Dan J. Putka,et al. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.
[23] Tamera L. McKinniss,et al. Using Narrow Facets of an Integrity Test to Predict Safety: A Test Validation Study , 2009 .
[24] Silvia Moscoso,et al. Internet-based Personality Testing: Equivalence of Measures and Assesses' Perceptions and Reactions , 2003 .
[25] Stuart M. Keeley,et al. Asking the Right Questions , 1981 .
[26] Rose A. Mueller-Hanson,et al. Adaptive Performance and Trainability as Criteria in Selection Research , 2012 .
[27] Wayne F. Cascio,et al. 3 Staffing Twenty‐first‐century Organizations , 2008 .
[28] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. THE DIVERSITY–VALIDITY DILEMMA: STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING RACIOETHNIC AND SEX SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES AND ADVERSE IMPACT IN SELECTION , 2008 .
[29] Michael T. Brannick,et al. A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures , 2006 .
[30] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Emergence of the Human Capital Resource: A Multilevel Model , 2011 .
[31] John A. Weiner,et al. Unproctored Online Testing: Environmental Conditions and Validity , 2009, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
[32] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Acquiring and Developing Human Capital in Service Contexts: The Interconnectedness of Human Capital Resources , 2011 .
[33] M. Ashton,et al. Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[34] M. Brannick,et al. Improving Prediction of Work Performance Through Frame-of-Reference Consistency: Empirical Evidence Using Openness to Experience , 2010 .
[35] Brent A. Scott,et al. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.
[36] T. Mitchell,et al. The Conditional Reasoning Measurement System for Aggression: An Overview , 2004, Human Performance.
[37] Ute R. Hülsheger,et al. Lang, J. W. B, Kersting, M., Hülsheger, U. R. & Lang, J. (2010). General mental ability, narrower cognitive abilities, and job performance: The perspective of the nested-factors model of cognitive abilities , 2012 .
[38] T. Judge,et al. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[39] T. Judge,et al. IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT IN ORGANIZATIONAL SETTINGS , 2007 .
[40] N. Tippins. Internet Alternatives to Traditional Proctored Testing: Where Are We Now? , 2009, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
[41] M. Schmit,et al. Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. , 1995 .
[42] N. Schmitt. The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection , 2012 .
[43] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. ORGANIZATIONAL STAFFING: A MULTILEVEL REVIEW, SYNTHESIS, AND MODEL , 2004 .
[44] Herman Aguinis,et al. Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.
[45] J. Carroll. Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .
[46] Jason L. Huang,et al. BEYOND PERSONALITY TRAITS: A STUDY OF PERSONALITY STATES AND SITUATIONAL CONTINGENCIES IN CUSTOMER SERVICE JOBS , 2011 .
[47] In-Sue Oh,et al. INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF PERCEPTUAL SPEED AND ACCURACY OVER GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY , 2008 .
[48] Jill C. Bradley,et al. The big five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.
[49] Filip Lievens,et al. Designing Pareto-optimal selection systems: formalizing the decisions required for selection system development. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.
[50] Dan J. Putka,et al. The Concept of Validity and the Process of Validation , 2012 .
[51] M. Donnellan,et al. Evaluating the Evidence for the General Factor of Personality across Multiple Inventories. , 2011, Journal of research in personality.
[52] M. Born,et al. Intentional response distortion on personality tests: using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.
[53] D. D. Steiner. Personnel Selection across the Globe , 2012 .
[54] Test of slope and intercept bias in college admissions: a response to Aguinis, Culpepper, and Pierce (2010). , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.
[55] F. Drasgow,et al. Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Pairwise Preference Items , 2012 .
[56] L. Hough. The 'Big Five' Personality Variables--Construct Confusion: Description Versus Prediction , 1992 .
[57] Bernd Marcus,et al. Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Typical and Maximum Managerial Performance , 2007 .
[58] Alexa A. Perryman,et al. Effects of selection and training on unit-level performance over time: a latent growth modeling approach. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.
[59] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDATION OF SELECTION PROCEDURES: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE , 2008 .
[60] Frederick L. Oswald,et al. They're Right, Well ... Mostly Right: Research Evidence and an Agenda to Rescue Personality Testing From 1960s Insights , 2005 .
[61] Todd E Bodner,et al. Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .
[62] Ingrid Kurz. A look into the “black box” , 1994 .
[63] Bennett E. Postlethwaite,et al. A matter of context: A meta‐analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. , 2012 .
[64] P. Sackett,et al. Differential prediction and the use of multiple predictors: the omitted variables problem. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[65] A. Neubauer,et al. Broad and narrow personality traits for predicting managerial success , 2010 .
[66] Richard G. Gardner,et al. The Five-factor Model of Personality Traits and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: a Meta-analysis Unresolved Issues regarding Citizenship and Personality , 2022 .
[67] V. Catano,et al. Using Measures Of Specific Abilities To Predict Training Performance in Canadian Forces Operator Occupations , 2004 .
[68] Huy Le,et al. Increasing the Accuracy of Corrections for Range Restriction: Implications for Selection Procedure Validities and Other Research Results , 2006 .
[69] F. Drasgow,et al. Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. , 1993 .
[70] Eric D. Heggestad,et al. Personality retesting for managing intentional distortion. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[71] J. Flynn,et al. Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments. , 2012, The American psychologist.
[72] F. Lievens,et al. Selecting Predictor Subsets: Considering Validity and Adverse Impact , 2010 .
[73] John P. Hausknecht,et al. Retesting in selection: a meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.
[74] Thomas R. Carretta,et al. General and Specific Cognitive and Psychomotor Abilities in Personnel Selection: The Prediction of Training and Job Performance , 2000 .
[75] Charles A. Scherbaum,et al. Validation Is Like Motor Oil: Synthetic Is Better , 2010, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
[76] L. A. Witt,et al. The Interactive Effects of Extraversion and Conscientiousness on Performance , 2002 .
[77] Neil Anderson,et al. INTERNATIONAL VALIDITY GENERALIZATION OF GMA AND COGNITIVE ABILITIES: A EUROPEAN COMMUNITY META-ANALYSIS , 2003 .
[78] Jinyan Fan,et al. Testing the efficacy of a new procedure for reducing faking on personality tests within selection contexts. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.
[79] L. Thurstone. Primary mental abilities. , 1938, Science.
[80] A. Ryan,et al. Applicant self-selection: correlates of withdrawal from a multiple hurdle process. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.
[81] Jeff W. Johnson,et al. VALIDATING SYNTHETIC VALIDATION: COMPARING TRADITIONAL AND SYNTHETIC VALIDITY COEFFICIENTS , 2010 .
[82] Paul R. Sackett,et al. Ability-personality interactions when predicting job performance , 1998 .
[83] J. Farr,et al. Handbook of employee selection , 2010 .
[84] Counterproductive Work Behavior and Withdrawal , 2010 .
[85] Ronald S. Landis,et al. The Effects of Cognitive Ability and Conscientiousness on Performance Over Time: A Censored Latent Growth Model , 2007 .
[86] D. Ones,et al. Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: a review and meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.
[87] P. Sackett,et al. Correction for range restriction: an expanded typology. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.
[88] Brian J. Hoffman,et al. A Review of Citizenship and Counterproductive Behaviors in Organizational Decision-Making , 2012 .
[89] Philip L. Roth,et al. Toward Better Meta-Analytic Matrices: How Input Values Can Affect Research Conclusions in Human Resource Management Simulations , 2011 .
[90] Anthony J. Nyberg,et al. Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.
[91] Tamera L. McKinniss,et al. The moderation of conscientiousness by cognitive ability when predicting workplace safety behavior , 2009 .
[92] Anton J. Villado,et al. Unproctored Internet-Based Tests of Cognitive Ability and Personality: Magnitude of Cheating and Response Distortion , 2009, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
[93] Michael A. McDaniel,et al. Linearity of Personality–Performance Relationships: A Large-Scale Examination , 2010 .
[94] Mary Anne Taylor,et al. Broad Versus Narrow Facets of Integrity: Predictive Validity and Subgroup Differences , 2005 .
[95] Murray R. Barrick,et al. Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. , 1993 .
[96] Kenneth J. Harris,et al. P = f (Conscientiousness × Ability): Examining the Facets of Conscientiousness , 2010 .
[97] F. Schmidt,et al. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .
[98] Murray R. Barrick,et al. Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? , 2001 .
[99] W. Coward,et al. Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. , 1990 .
[100] W. Borman,et al. Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .
[101] Ning Li,et al. The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior: The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics , 2012 .
[102] David P. Lepak,et al. How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms , 2012 .
[103] Ute R. Hülsheger,et al. Validity of General Mental Ability for the Prediction of Job Performance and Training Success in Germany: A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .
[104] Filip Lievens,et al. Combining predictors to achieve optimal trade-offs between selection quality and adverse impact. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.
[105] John C. Scott,et al. Web-Based Assessments , 2012 .
[106] K. Murphy,et al. Can Changes in Differential Dropout Rates Reduce Adverse Impact? A Computer Simulation Study of a Multi‐wave Selection System , 2004 .
[107] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. A Monte Carlo Comparison of Relative Importance Methodologies , 2004 .
[108] Murray R. Barrick,et al. Nature and Use of Personality in Selection , 2012 .
[109] Patrick H. Raymark,et al. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.
[110] F. Lievens,et al. Instruments for personnel selection in the 21st century: research and practice , 2011 .
[111] R. L. Dipboye,et al. RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS , 2007 .
[112] Joyce Hogan,et al. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.
[113] F. Schmidt,et al. Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. , 1979 .
[114] N. Schmitt,et al. The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.
[115] R. Dalal. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.
[116] James M. LeBreton,et al. History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research , 2004 .
[117] Kevin R. Murphy,et al. Why Don't Measures of Broad Dimensions of Personality Perform Better As Predictors of Job Performance? , 2005 .
[118] Dan J. Putka,et al. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.
[119] Neil Anderson,et al. A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[120] Alija Kulenović,et al. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .
[121] Reeshad S. Dalal,et al. A meta‐analytic investigation into the moderating effects of situational strength on the conscientiousness–performance relationship , 2009 .
[122] Lisa M. Penney,et al. A review of personality and performance: Identifying boundaries, contingencies, and future research directions , 2011 .
[123] M. Ziegler,et al. New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. , 2011 .
[124] J. Nijenhuis,et al. The General Factor of Personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study , 2010 .
[125] Kevin R. Murphy,et al. Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests , 1997 .
[126] Murray R. Barrick,et al. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .