Environmental and economic assessment of combined biostabilization and landfill for municipal solid waste.

Biostabilization can remove considerable amounts of moisture and degradable organic materials from municipal solid waste (MSW), and can therefore be an effective form of pretreatment prior to landfill. The environmental and economic impacts of two combined processes, active stage biostabilization + sanitary landfill (AL), and active and curing stage biostabilization + sanitary landfill (ACL), were compared with sanitary landfill (SL) for MSW with high moisture content. The results indicated that land requirement, leachate generation, and CH(4) emission in the ACL process decreased by 68.6%, 89.1%, and 87.6%, respectively, and the total cost was reduced by 24.1%, compared with SL. This implies that a combined biostabilization and landfill process can be an environmentally friendly and economically feasible alternative to landfill of raw MSW with high moisture content. Sensitivity analysis revealed that treatment capacity and construction costs of biostabilization and the oxidation factor of CH(4) significantly influenced the costs and benefits of the AL and ACL process at an extremely low land price. When the land price was greater than 100 USD m(-2), it became the dominating factor in determining the cost of treatment and disposal, and the total costs of ACL were reduced to less than 40% of those of SL.

[1]  Reynaldo Cruz-Rivera,et al.  Serial water balance method for predicting leachate generation in landfills , 2003, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[2]  Fulvia Tambone,et al.  Biostabilization of municipal solid waste. , 2004, Waste management.

[3]  J. Hoeks.  Significance of Biogas Production in Waste Tips , 1983 .

[4]  C Visvanathan,et al.  Pretreatment of municipal solid waste prior to landfilling. , 2005, Waste management.

[5]  Pascal Boeckx,et al.  Methane emission from a landfill and the methane oxidising capacity of its covering soil , 1996 .

[6]  K Münnich,et al.  Pilot project of mechanical-biological treatment of waste in Brazil. , 2006, Waste management.

[7]  R. Ham,et al.  The effect of municipal solid waste pretreatment on landfill behavior: a literature review , 1999 .

[8]  George Tchobanoglous,et al.  Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues , 1993 .

[9]  L. Shao,et al.  Bio-drying of municipal solid waste with high water content by aeration procedures regulation and inoculation. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Morton A Barlaz,et al.  Critical evaluation of factors required to terminate the postclosure monitoring period at solid waste landfills. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Mutasem El-Fadel,et al.  Modeling Leachate Generation and Transport in Solid Waste Landfills , 1997 .

[12]  L. Shao,et al.  Characterization of water-extractable organic matter during the biostabilization of municipal solid waste. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[14]  A. Muntoni,et al.  Landfill gas generation after mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste. Estimation of gas generation rate constants. , 2009, Waste management.

[15]  Lars Mikkel Johannessen.  Guidance note on recuperation of landfill gas from municipal solid waste landfills , 1999 .