Distributed Hammerstein Modeling for Cross-Coupling Effect of Multiaxis Piezoelectric Micropositioning Stages

Hysteresis modeling is interesting yet challenging for piezoelectric actuated systems, which are often used in micro/nano scale measurement and manufacturing equipments. However, due to its complexity, few efforts have been devoted to characterizing cross-coupling hysteresis effect of multiaxis piezoelectric micropositioning stages. To this end, a distributed Hammerstein model, composed of a cascaded connection of a static nonlinearity and a dynamic linearity, is proposed in this paper to approximate the nonlinear spatial/temporal cross-coupling effect. This model outperforms conventional piezo models, such as the Preisach model. Meanwhile, theoretical analysis is provided to guarantee the convergence of the proposed Hammerstein model. Finally, extensive experiments are conducted to verify the superiority of the proposed modeling method.

[1]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Design, analysis and testing of a parallel-kinematic high-bandwidth XY nanopositioning stage. , 2013, The Review of scientific instruments.

[2]  Chenkun Qi,et al.  A multi-channel spatio-temporal Hammerstein modeling approach for nonlinear distributed parameter processes , 2009 .

[3]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Robust Motion Tracking Control for a 2-DOF Flexure-Based Mechanism , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  A. Torii,et al.  Micro robot actuated by rapid deformation of piezoelectric elements , 2001, MHS2001. Proceedings of 2001 International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science (Cat. No.01TH8583).

[5]  J. Pang,et al.  AFM image reconstruction for deformation measurements by digital image correlation , 2006, Nanotechnology.

[6]  S O R Moheimani,et al.  Invited review article: high-speed flexure-guided nanopositioning: mechanical design and control issues. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[7]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  Real-Time Control of Photoresist Extinction Coefficient Uniformity in the Microlithography Process , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Modeling Piezoelectric Stack Actuators for Control of Mlcromanlpulatlon , 2022 .

[9]  P. Duren.  Theory of Hp Spaces , 2000 .

[10]  S. O. Reza Moheimani,et al.  Reducing Cross-Coupling in a Compliant XY Nanopositioner for Fast and Accurate Raster Scanning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  K. Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Coupling in piezoelectric tube scanners used in scanning probe microscopes , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[12]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Identification and Compensation of Piezoelectric Hysteresis Without Modeling Hysteresis Inverse , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System identification (2nd ed.): theory for the user , 1999 .

[14]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Design and control of a decoupled two degree of freedom translational parallel micro-positioning stage. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[15]  Chun-Yi Su,et al.  Odd-harmonic repetitive control for high-speed raster scanning of piezo-actuated nanopositioning stages with hysteresis nonlinearity , 2016 .

[16]  Gerber,et al.  Atomic Force Microscope , 2020, Definitions.

[17]  Jen-te Yu,et al.  Design and Control of Phase-Detection Mode Atomic Force Microscopy for Reconstruction of Cell Contours in Three Dimensions , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[18]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Multivariable Negative-Imaginary Controller Design for Damping and Cross Coupling Reduction of Nanopositioners: A Reference Model Matching Approach , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[19]  G. Binnig,et al.  Scanning tunneling microscopy , 1984 .

[20]  S. Karunanidhi,et al.  Design, analysis and simulation of magnetostrictive actuator and its application to high dynamic servo valve , 2010 .

[21]  T. Higuchi,et al.  Ultrahigh vacuum precise positioning device utilizing rapid deformations of piezoelectric elements , 1990 .

[22]  Paul K. Hansma,et al.  Design and input-shaping control of a novel scanner for high-speed atomic force microscopy , 2008 .

[23]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[24]  G. Dumont,et al.  Deterministic adaptive control based on Laguerre series representation , 1988 .

[25]  Yonghong Tan,et al.  Nonlinear Modeling and Decoupling Control of XY Micropositioning Stages With Piezoelectric Actuators , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[26]  Musa Jouaneh,et al.  Generalized preisach model for hysteresis nonlinearity of piezoceramic actuators , 1997 .

[27]  Rong-Fong Fung,et al.  System identification of a dual-stage XY precision positioning table , 2009 .

[28]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Modeling and Compensation of Asymmetric Hysteresis Nonlinearity for Piezoceramic Actuators With a Modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[29]  R. Bouc.  Forced Vibration of Mechanical Systems with Hysteresis , 1967 .

[30]  M. S. Rana,et al.  Nonlinearity Effects Reduction of an AFM Piezoelectric Tube Scanner Using MIMO MPC , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[31]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Modeling and Identification of Piezoelectric-Actuated Stages Cascading Hysteresis Nonlinearity With Linear Dynamics , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[32]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Design and Computational Optimization of a Decoupled 2-DOF Monolithic Mechanism , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[33]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Creep, Hysteresis, and Cross-Coupling Reduction in the High-Precision Positioning of the Piezoelectric Scanner Stage of an Atomic Force Microscope , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[34]  Sergej Fatikow,et al.  Modeling and Control of Piezo-Actuated Nanopositioning Stages: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.