Dynamics of Attention in Depth: Evidence from Multi-Element Tracking

We examined the allocation of attention in depth using a multi-element tracking paradigm. Observers were required to track a predefined subset of from two to eight elements in displays containing up to sixteen identical moving elements. We first show that depth cues, such as binocular disparity and occlusion through T-junctions, improve performance in a multi-element tracking task in the case where element boundaries are allowed to intersect in the depiction of motion in a single frontoparallel plane. We also show that the allocation of attention across two perceptually distinguishable planar surfaces, either frontoparallel or receding at a slanting angle and defined by coplanar elements, is easier than allocation of attention within a single surface. The same result was not found when attention was required to be deployed across items of two-color populations rather than across items of a single color. Our results suggest that, when surface information does not suffice to distinguish between targets and distractors that are embedded in these surfaces, division of attention across two surfaces aids in tracking moving targets. A final experiment with populations of elements moving within distinct volumes produced similar results, suggesting that spatial separation in three dimensions, rather than confinement to surfaces as such, may explain the improved performance for the two-surface case.

[1]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[6]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[9]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[10]  Z. Pylyshyn The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[11]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  K Nakayama,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.

[13]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[14]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  G J Andersen,et al.  Focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990 .

[17]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  O J Braddick,et al.  Pre-Attentive Detection of a Target Defined by Stereoscopic Slant , 1991, Perception.

[20]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. Findlay,et al.  Saccades to targets in three-dimensional space: Dependence of saccadic latency on target location , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  S. Yantis Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Silvia M. Mueller,et al.  An in-depth look at visual attention , 1994 .

[27]  C. Folk,et al.  Shifting Visual Attention in Stereographic Displays: A Time Course Analysis , 1994, Human factors.

[28]  Z. Pylyshyn Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention , 1994, Cognition.

[29]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple parallel access in visual attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[31]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  C W Tyler,et al.  Mechanisms of Stereoscopic Processing: Stereoattention and Surface Perception in Depth Reconstruction , 1995, Perception.

[33]  K Nakayama,et al.  Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Attention Based Visual Processes , 1996 .

[35]  C. Folk,et al.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-blind” attentional spotlight , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Seeing Two as One: Linking Apparent Motion and Repetition Blindness , 1997 .

[37]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-aware” attentional focus , 1997 .

[39]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[40]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  ATTENTION IN DEPTH: DISPARITY AND OCCLUSION CUES FACILITATE MULTI-ELEMENT VISUAL TRACKING , 1998 .

[42]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control within 3-D space. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking Multiple Items Through Occlusion: Clues to Visual Objecthood , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  C M Moore,et al.  Role of perceptual organization while attending in depth , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[46]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  B. Scholl Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[48]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Object and space-based attentional selection in three-dimensional space , 2001 .