Error Types in Ideomotor Apraxia: A Qualitative Analysis

Seventeen brain-damaged subjects with dominant hemisphere pathology and 24 matched control subjects were asked to perform simple familiar gestures under four conditions: (1) verbal command (pantomime), (2) imitation, (3) with the actual object, and (4) verbal command a second time. The subjects subsequently watched a video of an actor performing simple movements and decided whether or not these were performed accurately. The gestural production task was videoed and analyzed for error type. Error type remained consistent over the four task conditions, although subgroups of patients made different types of errors. One group of patients with Ideomotor Apraxia (IMA) made more errors but of the same type as the controls, i.e., movement-related errors and the use of "body part as object" (BPO). The second group made mainly substituted (i.e. unrelated) movements and perseverative errors. The second group of subjects was also poorer at discriminating incorrectly performed movements in the recognition task. BPO errors were commonly made by the control group and they were also chosen as correct in the recognition task. This indicated that use of BPO may reflect a convention in symbolising gestures rather than pathology. The performance of the IMA subjects was discussed in relation to current theories of the mechanisms underlying apraxia.