Predicting the safety performance of volunteers: Does motivation for volunteering influence driving behavior?

Abstract Volunteering has long been known for its positive effects on the individual and the community. However, no research to date has examined the safety of individuals when volunteering their services. The safety of individuals when driving a vehicle is particularly a concern in the nonprofit sector as volunteers is leaving organizations due to fear of public liability. As such, this paper aims to identify the internal motivational factors influencing the safety of volunteers when driving a vehicle ( n  = 73). Utilizing Clary’s et al. [Clary, E.G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R.D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A.A., Haugen, J., Miene, P., 1998. Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 1516–1530] scale of the motivational functions served by volunteering, we found that individuals who volunteer their services for ego-related functioning (protective) were more likely to report higher self-reported driving speeds, while individuals who volunteer their services for altruistic purposes (values) were more likely to report lower self-reported driving speeds. In turn, higher self-reported driving speeds were found to be associated with a greater number of self-reported crashes in the past two years. These results have important implications for volunteer driving organizations, as these results suggest that some motivations are associated with poorer driving performance.

[1]  P. Thoits,et al.  Volunteer work and well-being. , 2001, Journal of health and social behavior.

[2]  J. H. Steiger Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[3]  P. Bentler On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  P. Ulleberg PERSONALITY SUBTYPES OF YOUNG DRIVERS. RELATIONSHIP TO RISK-TAKING PREFERENCES, ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT, AND RESPONSE TO A TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMPAIGN , 2001 .

[5]  Kim S. Sankey,et al.  Relationships between young drivers' personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  D. Zohar Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: a leadership-based intervention model. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  M Meadows,et al.  Driving as part of your work may damage your health. , 2001 .

[9]  S L Lusk,et al.  A Comparison of Multiple Indicators , 1995, Evaluation & the health professions.

[10]  Sharon Newnam,et al.  Safety in work vehicles: a multilevel study linking safety values and individual predictors to work-related driving crashes. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[12]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[13]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[14]  G Maycock,et al.  THE SAFETY OF FLEET CAR DRIVERS: A REVIEW , 1999 .

[15]  M. Finkelstein,et al.  Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism , 1998 .

[16]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  P. Ulleberg,et al.  Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers , 2003 .

[18]  R. Sundeen Differences in Personal Goals and Attitudes Among Volunteers , 1992 .

[19]  E. Kelloway Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher′s Guide , 1998 .

[20]  A R Dimmer,et al.  THE ACCIDENTS, ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOUR OF COMPANY CAR DRIVERS , 1999 .

[21]  Mark Snyder,et al.  A functional analysis of altruism and prosocial behavior , 1991 .

[22]  P Lynn,et al.  THE ACCIDENTAL LIABILITY OF COMPANY CAR DRIVERS , 1999 .

[23]  E. Clary,et al.  Volunteers' motivations: a functional strategy for the recruitment, placement, and retention of volunteers. , 1992, Nonprofit management & leadership.

[24]  T. Lajunen,et al.  Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses , 2003 .

[25]  Jeremy D. Davey,et al.  Evaluating and improving fleet safety in Australia , 2003 .

[26]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[27]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research , 1994 .

[28]  N P Gregersen,et al.  Road safety improvement in large companies. An experimental comparison of different measures. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  H. Howe,et al.  Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries , 1996 .

[30]  Arthur A. Stukas,et al.  Volunteers' Motivations: Findings from a National Survey , 1996 .

[31]  S. Hendricks,et al.  Effect of recall on reporting of at-work injuries. , 1995, Public health reports.

[32]  Arthur A. Stukas,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Understanding and Assessing the Motivations of Volunteers: A Functional Approach , 2004 .

[33]  Narelle L. Haworth,et al.  REVIEW OF BEST PRACTICE ROAD SAFETY INITIATIVES IN THE CORPORATE AND/OR BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT , 2000 .

[34]  Myles McGregor-Lowndes,et al.  Volunteers and the new tort law reform , 2005 .

[35]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .