The QC relaxation: A theoretical and computational study on optimal power flow

Convex relaxations of the power flow equations and, in particular, the Semi-Definite Programming (SDP) and Second-Order Cone (SOC) relaxations, have attracted significant interest in recent years. The Quadratic Convex (QC) relaxation is a departure from these relaxations in the sense that it imposes constraints to preserve stronger links between the voltage variables through convex envelopes of the polar representation. This paper is a systematic study of the QC relaxation for AC Optimal Power Flow with realistic side constraints. The main theoretical result shows that the QC relaxation is stronger than the SOC relaxation and neither dominates nor is dominated by the SDP relaxation. In addition, comprehensive computational results show that the QC relaxation may produce significant improvements in accuracy over the SOC relaxation at a reasonable computational cost, especially for networks with tight bounds on phase angle differences. The QC and SOC relaxations are also shown to be significantly faster and reliable compared to the SDP relaxation given the current state of the respective solvers.

[1]  Garth P. McCormick,et al.  Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs: Part I — Convex underestimating problems , 1976, Math. Program..

[2]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  AMPL: A Mathematical Programing Language , 1989 .

[3]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[4]  Kim-Chuan Toh,et al.  SDPT3 -- A Matlab Software Package for Semidefinite Programming , 1996 .

[5]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Semidefinite Programming , 1996, SIAM Rev..

[6]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. I. Nonlinear and quadratic programming approaches , 1999 .

[7]  A. G. Expósito,et al.  Reliable load flow technique for radial distribution networks , 1999 .

[8]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. II. Newton, linear programming and interior point methods , 1999 .

[9]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Usefulness of DC power flow for active power flow analysis , 2005 .

[10]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..

[11]  R. Jabr Radial distribution load flow using conic programming , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  R. Jabr Optimal Power Flow Using an Extended Conic Quadratic Formulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  K. Fujisawa,et al.  Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems , 2008 .

[14]  Abhinav Verma,et al.  Power grid security analysis: an optimization approach , 2010 .

[15]  J. Riquelme-Santos,et al.  A simpler and exact mathematical model for the computation of the minimal power losses tree , 2010 .

[16]  J. Ramos,et al.  State-of-the-art, challenges, and future trends in security constrained optimal power flow , 2011 .

[17]  K. Mani Chandy,et al.  Inverter VAR control for distribution systems with renewables , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[18]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Daniel K. Molzahn,et al.  Examining the limits of the application of semidefinite programming to power flow problems , 2011, 2011 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[20]  F. S. Hover,et al.  Convex Models of Distribution System Reconfiguration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  K. Mani Chandy,et al.  Equivalence of branch flow and bus injection models , 2012, 2012 50th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[22]  S. Low,et al.  Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  J. Lavaei,et al.  Physics of power networks makes hard optimization problems easy to solve , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[24]  R. Jabr Optimization of AC Transmission System Planning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[25]  Joshua A. Taylor,et al.  Conic AC transmission system planning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  Paul A. Trodden,et al.  Local Solutions of the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Hassan L. Hijazi,et al.  Optimal AC Distribution Systems Reconfiguration , 2014, 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference.

[28]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Chance-Constrained Optimal Power Flow: Risk-Aware Network Control under Uncertainty , 2012, SIAM Rev..

[29]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Primal and dual bounds for Optimal Transmission Switching , 2014, 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference.

[30]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Moment-based relaxation of the optimal power flow problem , 2013, 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference.

[31]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  A Linear-Programming Approximation of AC Power Flows , 2012, INFORMS J. Comput..

[32]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow—Part II: Exactness , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[33]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow—Part I: Formulations and Equivalence , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[34]  Carleton Coffrin,et al.  NESTA, The NICTA Energy System Test Case Archive , 2014, ArXiv.

[35]  Florin Capitanescu,et al.  A Comprehensive Centralized Approach for Voltage Constraints Management in Active Distribution Grid , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[36]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Sparsity-Exploiting Moment-Based Relaxations of the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[37]  Javad Lavaei,et al.  Convex Relaxation for Optimal Power Flow Problem: Mesh Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[38]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  Equivalent Relaxations of Optimal Power Flow , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[39]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Network flow and copper plate relaxations for AC transmission systems , 2015, 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[40]  Javad Lavaei,et al.  Promises of Conic Relaxation for Contingency-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[41]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  AC-Feasibility on Tree Networks is NP-Hard , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.