Re: "Incidence of dementia among participants and nonparticipants in a longitudinal study of cognitive aging".

[1]  Martin Schumacher,et al.  Missing information caused by death leads to bias in relative risk estimates. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  Martin Schumacher,et al.  Interpreting and comparing risks in the presence of competing events , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  V. Pankratz,et al.  Incidence of dementia among participants and nonparticipants in a longitudinal study of cognitive aging. , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  Pierre Joly,et al.  Interval-censored time-to-event and competing risk with death: is the illness-death model more accurate than the Cox model? , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  H. Putter,et al.  Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls. , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  Niels Keiding,et al.  Interpretability and importance of functionals in competing risks and multistate models , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Martin Schumacher,et al.  Incidence densities in a competing events analysis. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  William A Ghali,et al.  Kaplan-Meier methods yielded misleading results in competing risk scenarios. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  Daniel Commenges,et al.  A penalized likelihood approach for an illness-death model with interval-censored data: application to age-specific incidence of dementia. , 2002, Biostatistics.

[10]  J Crowley,et al.  Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  J. Phair,et al.  Projecting disease when death is likely. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.