Perception of density by pedestrians on urban paths: an experiment in virtual reality

ABSTRACT This paper presents a virtual reality experiment in a controlled visualization laboratory. The study explores the impact of morphology on the perceived density by participants along pedestrian paths. The issue addressed is the intensification of existing urban centres, where over-crowding may diminish their viability. The basic hypothesis is that increased visibility in a given urban space will be evaluated with a lower perceived density, and in some cases, a preferred view will decrease the participant’s perceived density. This research can contribute to future research and practice for the planning and design of sustainable urban environments for the benefit of pedestrian users.

[1]  E. Feitelson Consumer Preferences and Willingness-to-pay for Water-related Residences in Non-urban Settings: A Vignette Analysis , 1992 .

[2]  E. Borukhov The trade-off between density and other objectives: A re-examination of planning norms , 1978 .

[3]  Eckart Lange,et al.  A comment on the market value of a room with a view , 2001 .

[4]  A. van Witteloostuijn,et al.  Companion to organizations , 2002 .

[5]  Magda Mavridou,et al.  Perception of Three-Dimensional Urban Scale in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2012 .

[6]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Assessment of path choices on a country walk using a virtual environment , 2001 .

[7]  Michelle E. Portman,et al.  To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[8]  Vikas Mehta,et al.  Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes , 2008 .

[9]  Philip Paar,et al.  Landscape visualizations: Applications and requirements of 3D visualization software for environmental planning , 2006, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[10]  Richard K. Norton,et al.  More and Better Local Planning: State-Mandated Local Planning in Coastal North Carolina , 2005 .

[11]  Michael Burt,et al.  A 3-D Visual Method for Comparative Evaluation of Dense Built-up Environments , 2003 .

[12]  Ruth Dalton Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments , 2001 .

[13]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[14]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[15]  Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman,et al.  The association between perceived density in minimum apartments and spatial openness index three-dimensional visual analysis , 2017 .

[16]  A. Stamps Effects of Area, Height, Elongation, and Color on Perceived Spaciousness , 2011 .

[17]  Juval Portugali,et al.  Using virtual reality environments to unveil the imageability of the city in homogenous and heterogeneous environments , 2016, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[18]  Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman Is Perception Quantifiable? Combining Measurements of Space with Quality of the View , 2015 .

[19]  D. Appleyard,et al.  “Toward an Urban Design Manifesto” , 1987, The City Reader.

[20]  Bige Tunçer,et al.  Visibility Analysis for 3D Urban Environments , 2013 .

[21]  I. Knez,et al.  Effects of biodiversity and environment-related attitude on perception of urban green space , 2017, Urban Ecosystems.

[22]  D. Fisher-Gewirtzman CAN 3D VISIBILITY CALCULATIONS ALONG A PATH PREDICT THE PERCEIVED DENSITY OF PARTICIPANTS IMMERSED IN A VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENT? , 2017 .

[23]  A. Stamps,et al.  Perceived Building Density as a Function of Layout , 2004, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  C. V. D. Bosch,et al.  Citizens’ perception of and satisfaction with urban forests and green space: Results from selected Southeast European cities , 2017 .

[25]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Cities Afoot—Pedestrians, Walkability and Urban Design , 2008 .

[26]  Jan M. Wiener,et al.  Exploring isovist-based correlates of spatial behavior and experience , 2005 .

[27]  Arza Churchman,et al.  Disentangling the Concept of Density , 1999 .

[28]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Vision and Action in Virtual Environments: Modern Psychophysics in Spatial Cognition Research , 2001 .

[29]  Asya Natapov,et al.  Visibility of urban activities and pedestrian routes: An experiment in a virtual environment , 2016, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[30]  Safei El-Deen Hamed,et al.  A NEW THEORY OF URBAN DESIGN , 1989, Landscape Journal.

[31]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Unpacking Walkability: Testing the Influence of Urban Design Features on Perceptions of Walking Environment Attractiveness , 2012 .

[32]  The impact of Different Building Height Configurations on Navigation and Wayfinding , 2009 .

[33]  Susan L Handy,et al.  The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX , 2005 .

[34]  Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman,et al.  Integrating ‘weighted views’ to quantitative 3D visibility analysis as a predictive tool for perception of space , 2018 .

[35]  Steven R. Strom GREAT STREETS , 1997, Landscape Journal.

[36]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Virtual reality as an empirical research tool - Exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[37]  Ruth Alison Conroy-Dalton,et al.  Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments , 2001 .

[38]  John Zacharias,et al.  Pedestrian Behavior Pedestrian Behavior and Perception in Urban Walking Environments , 2001 .

[39]  Richard Hedman,et al.  Fundamentals of Urban Design , 1985 .

[40]  Guillaume Moreau,et al.  Integration of Immersive Walking to Analyse Urban Daylighting Ambiences , 2008 .

[41]  Kevin. Dooley,et al.  Simulation Research Methods , 2001 .

[42]  Sinan Yuan,et al.  Experimental Research in Urban Spatial Cognition by Using Virtual Reality Technology , 2014 .

[43]  James R. Urban,et al.  TREES IN URBAN DESIGN , 1994, Landscape Journal.