EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties

The purpose of this work is to quantify the impact of dose uncertainty on radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation. Dose uncertainties are divided into two categories: physical and statistical. Physical dose uncertainty is associated with the systematic and/or random errors incurred during treatment planning and/or delivery. The dose uncertainty associated with Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions is deemed statistical and noted as artificial with respect to the actual delivered dose. We will refer to all dose uncertainties that arise from either calculation or delivery as stochastic. Both physical and statistical dose uncertainties are considered at the intra- and inter-voxel levels. To account for voxel dose uncertainty, we calculate the mean survival fraction (SF) for the random dose deposition. Mathematically, the expression for the mean survival fraction is identical to that used by Niemierko (1997 Med. Phys. 24 103-10) in defining equivalent uniform dose (EUD). To distinguish between spatial and probabilistic dose variations, we define equivalent stochastic dose (ESD) as a voxel dose that gives the mean expected survival fraction for the randomly deposited dose. For a probability density function f(D), that represents the probabilistic voxel dose, SF(ESD) can be calculated by convolving SF(D) with f(D). In the case where the probability density function follows a Gaussian distribution, an analytic expression is derived for SF(ESD). The derived expression is verified using the Monte Carlo method and ESD values calculated with varied radiosensitivities for cases of 60 and 70 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction. The analytic expression is also extended to account for a multi-voxel dose distribution that incorporates a spatial dose heterogeneity. The results show that survival fraction increases with an increased dose uncertainty. This reduction depends on radiobiological parameters attributed to tissue and tumour. For tissue, ESD drops to 55% of the mean physical dose when the dose has a 10% intra- and inter-voxel dose uncertainty and inhomogeneity.

[1]  I. Kawrakow The effect of Monte Carlo statistical uncertainties on the evaluation of dose distributions in radiation treatment planning. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  M A Ebert,et al.  Viability of the EUD and TCP concepts as reliable dose indicators. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  G S Bauman,et al.  Tracking the dose distribution in radiation therapy by accounting for variable anatomy , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J. Leong,et al.  Implementation of random positioning error in computerised radiation treatment planning systems as a result of fractionation. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Biologic and physical fractionation effects of random geometric errors. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J. Fowler,et al.  On cold spots in tumor subvolumes. , 2002, Medical physics.

[7]  S Zavgorodni,et al.  The impact of inter-fraction dose variations on biological equivalent dose (BED): the concept of equivalent constant dose , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  S. Zavgorodni,et al.  Implementation of random set-up errors in Monte Carlo calculated dynamic IMRT treatment plans , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  J Sempau,et al.  Towards the elimination of Monte Carlo statistical fluctuation from dose volume histograms for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  W A Beckham,et al.  Evaluation of the validity of a convolution method for incorporating tumour movement and set-up variations into the radiotherapy treatment planning system. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J M Balter,et al.  Quantization of setup uncertainties in 3-D dose calculations. , 1999, Medical physics.

[12]  J. Battista,et al.  Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy. I. The effect of shift invariance. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  J. Fowler The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  J T Booth,et al.  Modelling the dosimetric consequences of organ motion at CT imaging on radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Monte Carlo modelling of external radiotherapy photon beams. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  T Pawlicki,et al.  Removing the effect of statistical uncertainty on dose-volume histograms from Monte Carlo dose calculations. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  P J Keall,et al.  A fluence-convolution method to calculate radiation therapy dose distributions that incorporate random set-up error. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  S. Zavgorodni Treatment planning algorithm corrections accounting for random setup uncertainties in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[19]  M Goitein,et al.  Implementation of a model for estimating tumor control probability for an inhomogeneously irradiated tumor. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  S Webb,et al.  A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  A. Niemierko Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose. , 1997, Medical physics.

[22]  R. Mohan,et al.  The effect of dose calculation uncertainty on the evaluation of radiotherapy plans. , 2000, Medical physics.

[23]  A. Nahum,et al.  Monte Carlo dose calculations and radiobiological modelling: analysis of the effect of the statistical noise of the dose distribution on the probability of tumour control , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Isabelle M Gagné,et al.  The impact of tumor motion upon CT image integrity and target delineation. , 2004, Medical physics.