Examining Middle-School Students' Uses of Diigo Annotations to Engage in Collaborative Argumentative Writing

This chapter explores the ways sixth grade students from a linguistically and culturally diverse classroom used Diigo, an online social bookmarking site, to engage in annotation writing focused on the discussion of science ideas within a text. While the use of apps has rapidly increased in schools, there remains little research on the ways annotation writing can be used to support scientific argumentation. Findings from this study indicate that students used the annotation app to pose questions, formulate claims, and request evidence from peers to answer questions or support claims. These results suggest that the process of collaborative annotation encourages students’ documentation, critique, and refinement of ideas, which can aid learners in close reading of science texts. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-5982-7.ch004

[1]  N. Law,et al.  Questioning and the quality of knowledge constructed in a CSCL context: a study on two grade-levels of students , 2013 .

[2]  Keming Liu Annotation As an Index to Critical Writing , 2006 .

[3]  Dennis S. Davis,et al.  Collaborative sense-making in print and digital text environments , 2011, Reading and Writing.

[4]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Working on Understanding During Collaborative Online Reading , 2012 .

[5]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Influence of a Teacher’s Scaffolding Moves During Child-Led Small-Group Discussions , 2011 .

[6]  Mark Felton,et al.  The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation , 2004 .

[7]  Jacques Raynauld,et al.  « Le sac d’école électronique »: un outil technologique pouvant faciliter la mise en place de l’alignement curriculaire / The “digital school bag”: A technological tool to facilitate the implementation of curriculum alignment , 2012 .

[8]  Min Li,et al.  Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students' scientific explanations and student learning , 2010 .

[9]  Caroline Mei Lin Ho,et al.  Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in Second Life , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[10]  S. Yussen,et al.  Practices of Productive Adult Book Clubs , 2011 .

[11]  Tristan E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of a collaborative annotation method on students' learning and learning-related motivation and affect , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Erin M. McTigue,et al.  Science Visual Literacy: Learners' Perceptions and Knowledge of Diagrams , 2011 .

[13]  Elena Novak,et al.  The educational use of social annotation tools in higher education: A literature review , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Fei Gao,et al.  A case study of using a social annotation tool to support collaboratively learning , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[15]  Kimberley Gomez,et al.  Annotating to Support Learning in the Content Areas: Teaching and Learning Science , 2008 .

[16]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation , 2009 .

[17]  Adam Williams,et al.  Metacognitive support for reading in science classrooms , 2008, ICLS.

[18]  Joanna Wolfe,et al.  Annotations and the collaborative digital library: Effects of an aligned annotation interface on student argumentation and reading strategies , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[19]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The State of Cooperative Learning in Postsecondary and Professional Settings , 2007 .

[20]  Petri Nokelainen,et al.  A shared document-based annotation tool to support learner-centred collaborative learning , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[21]  Liping Deng,et al.  Reading Actively Online: An Exploratory Investigation of Online Annotation Tools for Inquiry Learning. , 2012 .

[22]  Liping Deng,et al.  Examining students' use of online annotation tools in support of argumentative reading , 2013 .

[23]  Wu-Yuin Hwang,et al.  A study of multimedia annotation of Web-based materials , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Effects of reviewing annotations and homework solutions on math learning achievement , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  Chia-Ching Lin,et al.  Participatory learning through behavioral and cognitive engagements in an online collective information searching activity , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[26]  Tristan E. Johnson,et al.  Individual and team annotation effects on students' reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  T. Shanahan,et al.  Analysis of Expert Readers in Three Disciplines , 2011 .

[28]  Huei-Tse Hou,et al.  Analyzing the Learning Process of an Online Role-Playing Discussion Activity , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[29]  Richard Beach,et al.  Using Apps to Support Disciplinary Literacy and Science Learning , 2013 .

[30]  M. Balgopal,et al.  Writing-to-Learn, Writing-to Communicate, & Scientific Literacy , 2013 .

[31]  Ren-Hung Hwang,et al.  Development and evaluation of a Web 2.0 annotation system as a learning tool in an e-learning environment , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Ching-Huei Chen,et al.  Instructional Approaches on Science Performance, Attitude and Inquiry Ability in a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment , 2012 .

[33]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A web-based programming learning environment to support cognitive development , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[34]  Tristan E. Johnson,et al.  Fostering the development of critical thinking skills, and reading comprehension of undergraduates using a Web 2.0 tool coupled with a learning system , 2010, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[35]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Written arguments and collaborative speech acts in practising the argumentative power of language through chat debates , 2007 .