Emissions of demand responsive services as an alternative to conventional transit systems

The environmental performance of public transport plays a key role in improving air quality in urban areas. An important way of improving existing transit services is to use innovative propulsive systems; however, this needs considerable financial resources that are not always available. Here we assess how the organizational form of the transit system may impact the environment relying on a new methodology that permits comparisons in terms of distance traveled between a traditional fixed-route and a demand responsive transit service. We apply an emission model to find the least polluting transit system under a broad range of scenarios with different road networks, service quality levels and demand densities. Results indicate that demand responsive transit services minimize emissions for high quality service level and low demand density scenarios. Furthermore, the possibility of employing smaller vans with lower emission factors guarantees additional substantial benefits in terms of atmospheric pollution for demand responsive transit services, thereby giving them a competitive advantage in virtually every case.

[1]  Randolph W. Hall,et al.  NETWORK DESIGN FOR A GRID HYBRID TRANSIT SERVICE , 2004 .

[2]  REDUCING ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND EXHAUST EMISSIONS IN PUBLIC ROAD TRANSPORT. ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN LAND TRANSPORT. PROCEEDINGS OF A SEMINAR ORGANISED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY, LUXEMBOURG, MAY 16-18, 1988 , 1989 .

[3]  C. Daganzo Checkpoint dial-a-ride systems , 1984 .

[4]  Cristina Pronello,et al.  The Impact of Different Organizational Forms of Road Public Transport on Distance Covered and Atmospheric Pollution , 2004 .

[5]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Public transport values of time , 2004 .

[6]  Marco Diana The importance of information flows temporal attributes for the efficient scheduling of dynamic demand responsive transport services , 2006 .

[7]  Zhan Guo,et al.  Assessment of the Transfer Penalty for Transit Trips Geographic Information System-Based Disaggregate Modeling Approach , 2004 .

[8]  Marco Diana,et al.  Potential contributions of demand responsive transit services in reducing public transit pollutants emissions in metropolitan areas: an example for the city of Turin , 2003 .

[9]  Mansour Rahimi,et al.  JOINTLY OPTIMIZING COST, SERVICE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN DEMAND-RESPONSIVE TRANSIT SCHEDULING , 2003 .

[10]  Maged Dessouky,et al.  A new regret insertion heuristic for solving large-scale dial-a-ride problems with time windows , 2004 .

[11]  Shyue Koong Chang,et al.  Comparison of Subsidized Fixed- and Flexible-Route Bus Systems , 1996 .