"Space of physics journals": in search of journals of quality

This paper analyses the problem of scientific quality of physics journals. The main assumption is that the quality of a physics journal exists only in reference to other journals. Instead of constructing new indicators of scientific quality, we identify a physical journal with corresponding empirical distribution function of citations. From our relational point of view, the space of physics journals is only a system of differences between empirical distribution functions of citations. Using data from Web of Science Core Collection we consider the space of physics journals and the space of scientific publishers. The first provides an objective basis for the grouping of physics journals on the basis of a whole range of indicators (citation statistics, country, publisher, etc.). The second reveals the "competitors' triangle" of regional publishers, transnational publishers and professional physical societies. These findings have prompted us to advance the hypothesis that the structure of the space of physics journals is determined by a system of relations between publishers.

[1]  E. Beckenbach CONVEX FUNCTIONS , 2007 .

[2]  Daril A. Vilhena Beyond bibliometrics : Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact , 2022 .

[3]  R. Phelps Convex Functions, Monotone Operators and Differentiability , 1989 .

[4]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities , 1979 .

[5]  Peter Taylor,et al.  Citation Statistics , 2009, ArXiv.

[6]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research. , 2011, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A review of theory and practice in scientometrics , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences , 2009, Scientometrics.

[9]  Joost Kosten A classification of the use of research indicators , 2016, Scientometrics.

[10]  L. Leydesdorff Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations , 2008 .

[11]  Lauren B. Collister,et al.  The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review , 2016, F1000Research.

[12]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features , 1977 .

[13]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? , 2011, Scientometrics.

[14]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  How Citation Boosts Promote Scientific Paradigm Shifts and Nobel Prizes , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Informetrics Needs a Foundation in the Theory of Science , 2016 .

[16]  Antonia Ferrer-Sapena,et al.  The impact factor as a measuring tool of the prestige of the journals in research assessment in mathematics , 2016 .

[17]  Derek R. Smith Impact factors, scientometrics and the history of citation-based research , 2012, Scientometrics.

[18]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[19]  Liying Yang,et al.  Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Iman Tahamtan,et al.  Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature , 2016, Scientometrics.

[21]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Journal Impact Factor Strongly Correlates with the Citedness of the Median Journal Paper , 2015 .

[22]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[23]  Jonathan Ariel Barmak,et al.  Algebraic Topology of Finite Topological Spaces and Applications , 2011 .

[24]  Karl Lintner,et al.  Impact factors. , 2014, International journal of cosmetic science.

[25]  Xue-Li Liu,et al.  Journal Impact Factor: Do the Numerator and Denominator Need Correction? , 2016, PloS one.

[26]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Journal impact measures in bibliometric research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[27]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[29]  Ryan Johnson,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences , 2022 .

[30]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions , 2016, bioRxiv.

[32]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[33]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Citations : Indicators of Quality ? The Impact Fallacy , 2016 .

[34]  Benoît Godin,et al.  On the origins of bibliometrics , 2006, Scientometrics.

[35]  Iain D. Craig,et al.  Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: A critical review of the literature , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[36]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classification , 2016, Scientometrics.

[37]  J. D. Bernal,et al.  Scientometrics: the project for a science of science transformed into an industry of measurements , 2014 .

[38]  Henk F. Moed Toward New Indicators of a Journal’s Manuscript Peer Review Process , 2016, Front. Res. Metr. Anal..

[39]  E. Garfield The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[40]  Marco Frittelli,et al.  Scientific research measures , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  History and Evolution of (Biblio)Metrics , 2014 .

[42]  Patrick J. F. Groenen,et al.  Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 2003 .

[43]  S. Haustein,et al.  The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era , 2015, PloS one.

[44]  Maarten van Wesel,et al.  Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications , 2015, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[45]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[46]  S. Rachev,et al.  The Methods of Distances in the Theory of Probability and Statistics , 2013 .

[47]  R. Todeschini,et al.  Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research , 2016 .

[48]  A. Shiryaev,et al.  Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes , 1987 .

[49]  Il-Yeol Song,et al.  Topological analysis of interdisciplinary scientific journals: which journals will be the next nature or science? , 2015, RACS.

[50]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics , 2011, Scientometrics.

[51]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[52]  Nikolay K. Vitanov,et al.  Science Dynamics and Research Production: Indicators, Indexes, Statistical Laws and Mathematical Models , 2016 .

[53]  Enys Mones,et al.  Hierarchical networks of scientific journals , 2015, Palgrave Communications.

[54]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report , 2016, Scientometrics.

[55]  N. Bourbaki General Topology: Chapters 1–4 , 1989 .

[56]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators , 2012, Scientometrics.

[57]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Understanding the Scientific Enterprise: Citation Analysis, Data and Modeling , 2015 .