The function relating the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward to stimulation strength varies with site of stimulation

[1]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Specificity of brain stimulation reward in the rat. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  Richard J. Herrnstein,et al.  MAXIMIZING AND MATCHING ON CONCURRENT RATIO SCHEDULES1 , 1975 .

[5]  L. Gollub,et al.  Duration and rate of reinforcement as determinants of concurrent responding. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  W. Baum,et al.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  A portrait of the substrate for self-stimulation. , 1981 .

[8]  P. Rompré,et al.  Psychophysical method for mapping behavioral substrates using a moveable electrode , 1982, Brain Research Bulletin.

[9]  D. Harper Competitive foraging in mallards: “Ideal free’ ducks , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  P. Rompré,et al.  Pontine and mesencephalic substrates of self-stimulation , 1985, Brain Research.

[11]  E. Miliaressis,et al.  Summation and saturation properties in the rewarding effect of brain stimulation , 1987, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  J. Yeomans Two substrates for medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation: Myelinated axons and dopamine axons , 1989, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[13]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Measuring the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward by titration with rate of reward. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Effect of current on the maximum possible reward. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.