Power-Capacity and Ramp-Capability Reserves for Wind Integration in Power-Based UC

This paper proposes a power-based network-constrained unit commitment (UC) model as an alternative to the traditional deterministic UCs to deal with wind generation uncertainty. The formulation draws a clear distinction between power-capacity and ramp-capability reserves to deal with wind production uncertainty. These power and ramp requirements can be obtained from wind forecast information. The model is formulated as a power-based UC, which schedules power-trajectories instead of the traditional energy-blocks and takes into account the inherent startup and shutdown power trajectories of thermal units. These characteristics allow a correct representation of unit's ramp schedule which define their ramp availability for reserves. The proposed formulation significantly decreases operation costs compared to traditional deterministic and stochastic UC formulations while simultaneously lowering the computational burden. The operation cost comparison is made through 5-min economic dispatch simulation under hundreds of out-of-sample wind generation scenarios.

[1]  Xu Andy Sun,et al.  Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Yongpei Guan,et al.  Unified Stochastic and Robust Unit Commitment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Andres Ramos,et al.  Tight and Compact MILP Formulation of Start-Up and Shut-Down Ramping in Unit Commitment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  The Worst-case Wind Scenario for Adaptive Robust Unit Commitment Problems , 2013 .

[5]  Andres Ramos,et al.  An MIP Formulation for Joint Market-Clearing of Energy and Reserves Based on Ramp Scheduling , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  M. M. De Weerdt,et al.  Online Companion for Robust Unit Commitment with Dispatchable Wind: An LP Reformulation of the Second-stage , 2015 .

[7]  A. Papavasiliou,et al.  Reserve Requirements for Wind Power Integration: A Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming Framework , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  J. Latorre,et al.  Tight and Compact MILP Formulation for the Thermal Unit Commitment Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  A. Ben-Tal,et al.  Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs , 2004, Math. Program..

[10]  X. Guan,et al.  Energy delivery capacity and generation scheduling in the deregulated electric power market , 1999 .

[11]  Claudio Gentile,et al.  Tight MIP formulations of the power-based unit commitment problem , 2015, OR Spectr..

[12]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Adaptable optimization: theory and algorithms , 2006 .

[13]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering , 2003 .

[14]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Allocation of Hourly Reserve Versus Demand Response for Security-Constrained Scheduling of Stochastic Wind Energy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[15]  J. García-González,et al.  Impact on reserves and energy delivery of current UC-based Market-Clearing formulations , 2012, 2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market.

[16]  Jesús María Latorre Canteli,et al.  Tight and compact MILP formulation of start-up and shut-down ramping in unit commitment , 2013, PES 2013.

[17]  German Morales-Espana,et al.  Unit Commitment : Computational Performance, System Representation and Wind Uncertainty Management , 2014 .