Meta‐ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology

This contribution proposes the meta-ecosystem concept as a natural extension of the metapopulation and metacommunity concepts. A meta-ecosystem is defined as a set of ecosystems connected by spatial flows of energy, materials and organisms across ecosystem boundaries. This concept provides a powerful theoretical tool to understand the emergent properties that arise from spatial coupling of local ecosystems, such as global source–sink constraints, diversity–productivity patterns, stabilization of ecosystem processes and indirect interactions at landscape or regional scales. The meta-ecosystem perspective thereby has the potential to integrate the perspectives of community and landscape ecology, to provide novel fundamental insights into the dynamics and functioning of ecosystems from local to global scales, and to increase our ability to predict the consequences of land-use changes on biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services to human societies.

[1]  Kimberly A. With.  The Application of Neutral Landscape Models in Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[2]  J. Shurin,et al.  Effects of Competition, Predation, and Dispersal on Species Richness at Local and Regional Scales , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[4]  R. O'Neill.  A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[5]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. , 1993 .

[6]  S. Levin.  Dispersion and Population Interactions , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Coexistence in Metacommunities: The Regional Similarity Hypothesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[8]  M. Loreau.  Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity , 2000 .

[9]  J. S. WEIR,et al.  Importation of Nutrients into Woodlands by Rooks , 1969, Nature.

[10]  A. Hastings,et al.  Consumer movement through differentially subsidized habitats creates a spatial food web with unexpected results , 2002 .

[11]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization , 1996 .

[12]  M. Murakami,et al.  Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Holyoak,et al.  Persistence of an Extinction-Prone Predator-Prey Interaction Through Metapopulation Dynamics , 1996 .

[14]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments , 1997 .

[16]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at local and regional spatial scales , 2002 .

[17]  J. Elser,et al.  Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere , 2002 .

[18]  D. Schindler,et al.  Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems , 2002 .

[19]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[20]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  7 – From Metapopulation Dynamics to Community Structure: Some Consequences of Spatial Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[21]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  Complex Interactions in Metacommunities, with Implications for Biodiversity and Higher Levels of Selection , 1992 .

[22]  S. Piraino,et al.  The continuity of living matter and the discontinuities of its constituents: do plankton and benthos really exist? , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  B. Menge,et al.  Benthic-pelagic links and rocky intertidal communities: bottom-up effects on top-down control? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities , 2002 .

[25]  J. Lawton,et al.  Linking Species and Ecosystems , 1996 .

[26]  D. L. DeAngelis,et al.  Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs , 1992, Population and Community Biology Series.

[27]  R. Margalef,et al.  On Certain Unifying Principles in Ecology , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[28]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[29]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Immigration and the Maintenance of Local Species Diversity , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[30]  M. L. Cadenasso,et al.  Landscape Ecology: Spatial Heterogeneity in Ecological Systems , 1995, Science.

[31]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web , 2000 .

[32]  M. Power,et al.  RIVER–WATERSHED EXCHANGE: EFFECTS OF RIVERINE SUBSIDIES ON RIPARIAN LIZARDS AND THEIR TERRESTRIAL PREY , 2002 .

[33]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[34]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Food webs in space: On the interplay of dynamic instability and spatial processes , 2002, Ecological Research.

[35]  R. Forman.  Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1995 .

[36]  M. Leibold.  Similarity and local co-existence of species in regional biotas , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[37]  S. McNaughton,et al.  Ecology of a Grazing Ecosystem: The Serengeti , 1985 .

[38]  Arthur D. Hasler,et al.  Coupling of Land and Water Systems , 1975, Ecological Studies.

[39]  G. Polis,et al.  TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF LANDSCAPE AND FOOD WEB ECOLOGY : The Dynamics of Spatially Subsidized Food Webs , 2005 .

[40]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[41]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives , 2002 .

[42]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[43]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[44]  M. Loreau,et al.  Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters , 2002 .

[45]  C. Codeço,et al.  Competition along a Spatial Gradient of Resource Supply: A Microbial Experimental Model , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[46]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .