Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this case series was to introduce a complete digital workflow for the production of monolithic implant crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS Six patients were treated with implant-supported crowns made of resin nano ceramic (RNC). Starting with an intraoral optical scan (IOS), and following a CAD/CAM process, the monolithic crowns were bonded either to a novel prefabricated titanium abutment base (group A) or to a CAD/CAM-generated individualized titanium abutment (group B) in premolar or molar sites on a soft tissue level dental implant. Economic analyses included clinical and laboratory steps. An esthetic evaluation was performed to compare the two abutment-crown combinations. RESULTS None of the digitally constructed RNC crowns required any clinical adaptation. Overall mean work time calculations revealed obvious differences for group A (65.3 min) compared with group B (86.5 min). Esthetic analysis demonstrated a more favorable outcome for the prefabricated bonding bases. CONCLUSIONS Prefabricated or individualized abutments on monolithic RNC crowns using CAD/CAM technology in a model-free workflow seem to provide a feasible and streamlined treatment approach for single-edentulous space rehabilitation in the posterior region. However, RNC as full-contour material has to be considered experimental, and further large-scale clinical investigations with long-term follow-up observation are necessary.

[1]  U. Belser,et al.  Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[2]  D. Edelhoff,et al.  In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  Dennis J Fasbinder,et al.  Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. , 2010, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[4]  Urs C. Belser,et al.  Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[5]  Neal Patel,et al.  Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  Urs Brägger,et al.  Economic aspects of single-tooth replacement. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  Sang J. Lee,et al.  Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  M. Koller,et al.  Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD/ CAM: customization case study. , 2012, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[9]  D. Bourgeois,et al.  Cost-effectiveness modeling of dental implant vs. bridge. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  German O Gallucci,et al.  Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.