Exploring the Virtual Space of Academia

The aim of this chapter is to provide a view on how researchers present themselves in a social network specifically developed for supporting academic practices, how they share information and engage in dialogues with colleagues worldwide. We analysed data from 30,428 users who have registered on a publicly available website to study the effect of academic position, university ranking and country on people’s behaviour. Results suggest that the virtual network closely mirrors physical reality, reproducing the same hierarchical structure imposed by position, ranking, and country on user behaviour. Despite the potential for bridging and bonding social capital the networks have not achieved substantial changes in structures and practices of the academic context. Furthermore, our analysis highlights the need of finding new strategies to motivate the users to contribute to the community and support equal participation, as so far the community is mainly exploited as a static website.

[1]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  Stephen Farrell,et al.  Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging , 2007, UIST.

[3]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[4]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Motivations to participate in online communities , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  K. Riemer,et al.  Corporate Social Networking Sites – Modes of Use and Appropriation through Co-Evolution , 2009 .

[7]  Peter Thomas,et al.  Being online, living offline: the influence of social ties over the appropriation of social network sites , 2008, CSCW.

[8]  Volker Wulf,et al.  IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld , 2009, New Media Soc..

[10]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[11]  Harsha Gangadharbatla Facebook Me , 2008 .

[12]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of online social networks , 2006, KDD '06.

[13]  Anna Wu,et al.  Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site , 2010, CHI.

[14]  M. Huysman,et al.  Social Capital and Information Technology , 2004 .

[15]  Kaisa Väänänen,et al.  Identifying drivers and hindrances of social user experience in web services , 2010, CHI.

[16]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization , 2009, C&T.

[17]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin , 2009, GROUP.

[18]  Markus Rohde,et al.  Building Social Capital in an Iranian NGO Community System , 2004 .

[19]  Catalina L. Toma Affirming the self through online profiles: beneficial effects of social networking sites , 2010, CHI.

[20]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media , 2009, GROUP.