Spatial distribution of clinical computer systems in primary care in England in 2016 and implications for primary care electronic medical record databases: a cross-sectional population study

Objectives UK primary care databases (PCDs) are used by researchers worldwide to inform clinical practice. These databases have been primarily tied to single clinical computer systems, but little is known about the adoption of these systems by primary care practices or their geographical representativeness. We explore the spatial distribution of clinical computing systems and discuss the implications for the longevity and regional representativeness of these resources. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting English primary care clinical computer systems. Participants 7526 general practices in August 2016. Methods Spatial mapping of family practices in England in 2016 by clinical computer system at two geographical levels, the lower Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG, 209 units) and the higher National Health Service regions (14 units). Data for practices included numbers of doctors, nurses and patients, and area deprivation. Results Of 7526 practices, Egton Medical Information Systems (EMIS) was used in 4199 (56%), SystmOne in 2552 (34%) and Vision in 636 (9%). Great regional variability was observed for all systems, with EMIS having a stronger presence in the West of England, London and the South; SystmOne in the East and some regions in the South; and Vision in London, the South, Greater Manchester and Birmingham. Conclusions PCDs based on single clinical computer systems are geographically clustered in England. For example, Clinical Practice Research Datalink and The Health Improvement Network, the most popular primary care databases in terms of research outputs, are based on the Vision clinical computer system, used by <10% of practices and heavily concentrated in three major conurbations and the South. Researchers need to be aware of the analytical challenges posed by clustering, and barriers to accessing alternative PCDs need to be removed.

[1]  M. Laudicella,et al.  Regional variation in the productivity of the English national health service. , 2013, Health Economics.

[2]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[3]  I. Buchan,et al.  Trends in mortality from 1965 to 2008 across the English north-south divide: comparative observational study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Gwyn Bevan,et al.  Variations in health care: the good, the bad and the inexplicable. , 2011 .

[5]  Maurizio Pisati,et al.  SPMAP: Stata module to visualize spatial data , 2007 .

[6]  Carol Coupland,et al.  Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate survival in patients with colorectal cancer: cohort study , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[7]  Martin Roland,et al.  Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Roy,et al.  Use of demographic and pharmacy data to identify patients included within both the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and The Health Improvement Network (THIN) , 2015, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[9]  D. Reeves,et al.  ClinicalCodes: An Online Clinical Codes Repository to Improve the Validity and Reproducibility of Research Using Electronic Medical Records , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  M. Whitehead,et al.  Is there a north-south divide in social class inequalities in health in Great Britain? Cross sectional study using data from the 2001 census , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  I. Buchan,et al.  North-South disparities in English mortality1965–2015: longitudinal population study , 2017, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[12]  J. Valderas,et al.  Withdrawing performance indicators: retrospective analysis of general practice performance under UK Quality and Outcomes Framework , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Steve Caine,et al.  Developing a large electronic primary care database (Doctors' Independent Network) for research , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  A Greedy Algorithm for Representative Sampling: repsample in Stata , 2013 .

[15]  K. Thiru,et al.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Tom Chan,et al.  The Development of Primary Care Information Technology in the United Kingdom , 2008, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[17]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  Relationship between quality of care and choice of clinical computing system: retrospective analysis of family practice performance under the UK's quality and outcomes framework , 2013, BMJ Open.

[18]  Andrew Millman,et al.  ABC of Medical Computing: COMPUTERS IN GENERAL PRACTICE--I , 1995, BMJ.

[19]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[20]  Computers in general practice - III , 1995 .

[21]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Nonparametric Regression via StatLSSVM , 2013 .

[22]  David Moher,et al.  The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting Guidelines , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  I. Buchan,et al.  North-South disparities in English mortality 1965-2015: longitudinal population study. , 2017, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[24]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Variation in clinical coding lists in UK general practice: a barrier to consistent data entry? , 2007, Informatics in primary care.

[25]  Stephen Timmons,et al.  Evolution of primary care databases in UK: a scientometric analysis of research output , 2016, BMJ Open.