Efficiency of graphical perception

The termgraphical perception refers to the part played by visual perception in analyzing graphs. Computer graphics have stimulated interest in the perceptual pros and cons of different formats for displaying data. One way of evaluating the effectiveness of a display is to measure theefficiency (as defined by signal-detection theory) with which an observer extracts information from the graph. We measured observers’ efficiencies in detecting differences in the means or variances of pairs of data sets sampled from Gaussian distributions. Sample size ranged from 1 to 20 for viewing times of 0.3 or 1 sec. The samples were displayed in three formats: numerical tables, scatterplots, and luminance-coded displays. Efficiency was highest for the scatterplots (≅60% for both means and variances) and was only weakly dependent on sample size and exposure time. The pattern of results suggests parallel perceptual computation in which a constant proportion of the available information is used. Efficiency was lowest for the numerical tables and depended more strongly on sample size and viewing time. The results suggest serial processing in which a fixed amount of the available information is processed in a given time.

[1]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Brightness function: effects of adaptation. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  A Burgess.  Effect of quantization noise on visual signal detection in noisy images. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  R. F.,et al.  Mathematical Statistics , 1944, Nature.

[4]  H. Barlow.  The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[5]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[6]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[7]  William S. Cleveland.  The elements of graphing data , 1980 .

[8]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[10]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots , 1983, Vision Research.

[11]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[12]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[13]  R McGill,et al.  Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data , 1985, Science.

[14]  K. S. Kölbig,et al.  Errata: Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun, editors, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series, No. 55, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1994, and all known reprints , 1972 .

[15]  D. Kersten.  Statistical efficiency for the detection of visual noise , 1987, Vision Research.

[16]  David E. Coleman,et al.  Elements of Graphing Data , 1987 .

[17]  B. Sakitt.  Indices of Discriminability , 1973, Nature.

[18]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  H. Barlow,et al.  The statistical efficiency for detecting sinusoidal modulation of average dot density in random figures , 1981, Vision Research.

[20]  R. Mansfield.  Brightness function: effect of area and duration. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[21]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[22]  T. Marill.  Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[23]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .