Resources and time pressure as day-level antecedents of work engagement

This diary study adds to research on the Job Demands-Resources model. We test main propositions of this model on the level of daily processes, namely, additive and interaction effects of day-specific job demands and day-specific job and personal resources on day-specific work engagement. One hundred and fourteen employees completed electronic questionnaires three times a day over the course of one working week. Hierarchical linear models indicated that day-specific resources (psychological climate, job control, and being recovered in the morning) promoted work engagement. As predicted, day-specific job control qualified the relationship between day-specific time pressure and work engagement: on days with higher job control, time pressure was beneficial for work engagement. On days with lower job control, time pressure was detrimental for work engagement. We discuss our findings and contextualize them in the current literature on dynamic and emergent job characteristics.

[1]  Paul E. Spector Perceived Control by Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Concerning Autonomy and Participation at Work , 1986 .

[2]  S. Parker,et al.  Rushed, unhappy, and drained: an experience sampling study of relations between time pressure, perceived control, mood, and emotional exhaustion in a group of accountants. , 1999, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[3]  J. Clasen Instrument zur stressbezogenen Tätigkeitsanalyse bei Freelancern auf Basis des ISTA von Semmer, Zapf und Dunckel , 2012 .

[4]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  When can employees have a family life? The effects of daily workload and affect on work-family conflict and social behaviors at home. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  K. Daniels,et al.  Match making and match breaking: the nature of match within and around job design , 2010 .

[6]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[7]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity under the gun. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[8]  K. Daniels Rethinking job characteristics in work stress research , 2006 .

[9]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach , 2002 .

[10]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: The role of job stressors, job involvement, and recovery-related self-efficacy , 2006, Work and Rest: A Topic for Work and Organizational Psychology.

[11]  Sandra Ohly,et al.  Diary Studies in Organizational Research: An Introduction and Some Practical Recommendations , 2010 .

[12]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources , 2009 .

[13]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire , 2006 .

[14]  T. Meijman Psychological Aspects of Workload , 1998 .

[15]  S. Hobfoll Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[16]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. , 2009 .

[18]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model : state of the art , 2007 .

[19]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[20]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism , 2009 .

[21]  Nathan P. Podsakoff,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Test of the Challenge Stressor–Hindrance Stressor Framework: An Explanation for Inconsistent Relationships Among Stressors and Performance , 2005 .

[22]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Not all days are created equal : the concept of state work engagement , 2010 .

[24]  E. Deci,et al.  The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality , 1985 .

[25]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Role of Personal Resources in the Job Demands-Resources Model , 2007 .

[26]  S. Sonnentag Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  J. de Jonge,et al.  Stressors, resources, and strain at work: a longitudinal test of the triple-match principle. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Bradley J. Brummel,et al.  Defining Employee Engagement for Productive Research and Practice , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[29]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study , 2004 .

[30]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept , 2012 .

[31]  Christopher P. Parker,et al.  Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta-analytic review , 2003 .

[32]  A. Bakker,et al.  Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[33]  Despoina Xanthopoulou,et al.  Working in the sky: a diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. , 2008, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[34]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[35]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  Making the Break Count: An Episodic Examination of Recovery Activities, Emotional Experiences, and Positive Affective Displays , 2008 .

[36]  J. Siegrist Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. , 1996, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[37]  Daniel J. Bauer,et al.  Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis , 2006 .

[38]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[39]  A. Shirom,et al.  Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. , 2001 .

[40]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[41]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Daily performance at work : feeling recovered in the morning as a predictor of day-level job performance , 2009 .

[42]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Healthy Work : Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life , 1990 .

[43]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[44]  S. Jordan Making the break. , 2004, Nursing management.

[45]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Staying well and engaged when demands are high: the role of psychological detachment. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  A. Stone,et al.  Momentary Capture of Real-World Data. , 2006 .