Moral Reasoning of Education Students: The Effects of Direct Instruction in Moral Development Theory and Participation in Moral Dilemma Discussion

Background/Context Results of the few studies that have investigated moral reasoning in education students suggest that such reasoning may be less advanced for them than for college students with non–education majors and that education students do not appear to advance in moral reasoning from freshman to senior year. Purpose The purpose of the present study was to test an educational intervention designed to advance moral reasoning scores of undergraduate elementary and secondary education students. Setting The study was conducted in undergraduate classrooms at the University of Nevada, Reno, a Western Land Grant institution. Participants Participants were undergraduate elementary (n = 94) and secondary education majors (n = 98) and undergraduate students majoring in English literature and philosophy (n = 42). Research Design The study was a quasi-experimental design. Data Collection and Analysis Undergraduate education students enrolled in four sections of an introduction to educational psychology course received interventions designed to advance moral reasoning. English and philosophy courses were chosen as control groups. Over a period of 5 weeks, students in the intervention groups were taught moral development theories and participated in online dilemma discussion. An additional 3 weeks were devoted to pretesting and posttesting activities. Results A 2 x 5 mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA; time by group) with repeated measures on time was conducted to analyze pre- and posttest2 DIT P-scores for all five subgroups. Significant increases in mean DIT P-scores were found for the elementary and secondary intervention groups but not for the control groups. Gains in both the elementary and secondary groups were maintained at posttest2 at the end of the semester, but there were no significant differences from posttest1 to posttest2. To determine the effectiveness of hypothetical versus real-life dilemma discussion on moral reasoning, a 2 x 3 mixed ANOVA (time by group) was conducted. The ANOVA main effect for time and the interaction were significant, whereas the main effect for group was not significant. Conclusions/Recommendations Results of the present study support findings of previous studies providing evidence that principled moral reasoning can be advanced by deliberate educational interventions. Future studies should investigate whether gains will be maintained over longer periods of time than a single semester and whether mere gains in moral reasoning scores translate to a broader range of moral behaviors.

[1]  James R. Rest.  Development in Judging Moral Issues , 1979 .

[2]  S. Lerkiatbundit,et al.  Impact of the Konstanz method of dilemma discussion on moral judgment in allied health students: a randomized controlled study. , 2006, Journal of allied health.

[3]  Cleborne D. Maddux,et al.  Principled Moral Reasoning and Behavior of Preservice Teacher Education Students , 2001 .

[4]  J. Piaget.  The Moral Judgment of the Child , 1932 .

[5]  Darcia Narvaez,et al.  Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics , 1994 .

[6]  Judith R. Lampe.  Teacher Education Students' Moral Development and Ethical Reasoning Processes. , 1994 .

[7]  Teacher Socialization: Opportunities for University-School Partnerships to Improve Professional Cultures , 2002 .

[8]  Solomon Abebe,et al.  Transcendence in the Public Schools: The Teacher as Moral Model , 2004 .

[9]  Fon-Yean Chang,et al.  School Teachers’ Moral Reasoning , 1994 .

[10]  K. Strike,et al.  The Ethics of School Administration , 1985 .

[11]  John I. Goodlad,et al.  Places Where Teachers Are Taught , 1990 .

[12]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. , 1986 .

[13]  J. B. Sears.  Ethics in School Administration , 1950 .

[14]  Cleborne D. Maddux,et al.  WebQuests: Are They Developmentally Appropriate? , 2007 .

[15]  D. Krebs,et al.  The Construction of Moral Dilemmas in Everyday Life , 2000 .

[16]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach , 1999 .

[17]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[18]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. , 1997 .

[19]  James R. Rest,et al.  A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach: The DIT and Schema Theory , 1999 .

[20]  M. Yeazell,et al.  Levels of Moral Judgment of Faculty and Students in a Teacher Education Program: A Micro Study of an Institution. , 1988 .

[21]  James R. Rest.  Background: theory and research , 1994 .

[22]  I. Firestone,et al.  The Effects of an Intervention To Advance Moral Reasoning and Efficacy. , 1998 .

[23]  P. Molenaar,et al.  A developmental model of hierarchical stage structure in objective moral judgements , 1989 .

[24]  Cleborne D. Maddux,et al.  Curriculum‐embedded performance assessment in higher education: maximum efficiency and minimum disruption , 2008 .

[25]  Cleborne D. Maddux.  The Semantic Web and Educational Technology. , 2008 .

[26]  L. Kohlberg,et al.  Child Psychology and Childhood Education: A Cognitive-Developmental View , 1987 .

[27]  D. Yost.  The Moral Dimensions of Teaching and Preservice Teachers: Can Moral Dispositions be Influenced? , 1997 .

[28]  L. Kohlberg.  The Philosophy of Moral Development Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice , 1981 .

[29]  Ned A. Flanders,et al.  Analyzing Teaching Behavior , 1970 .

[30]  Teachers' Level of Moral Reasoning and Their Understanding of Classroom Rules and Roles , 1987, The Elementary School Journal.

[31]  J. Snarey.  Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: a critical review of Kohlbergian research. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  S. Thoma.  Moral Judgments and Moral Action , 1994 .

[33]  Teacher reasoning and moral judgement in the context of student discipline situations , 1993 .

[34]  D. Narvaez.  Does Reading Moral Stories Build Character? , 2002 .

[35]  E. Amidon,et al.  Improving teaching : the analysis of classroom verbal interaction , 1966 .

[36]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  Does Moral Education Improve Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies Using the Defining Issues Test , 1985 .

[37]  B. Cooper.  Empathy, Interaction and Caring: Teachers' Roles in a Constrained Environment , 2004 .

[38]  Moral Judgment Differences in Education and Liberal Arts Majors: Cause for Concern? , 2006 .

[39]  Darcia Narv ez,et al.  College Teaching and Student Moral Development Steven P.McNeel , 1994 .

[40]  Calliope Haritos.  Understanding Teaching through the Minds of Teacher Candidates: A Curious Blend of Realism and Idealism. , 2004 .

[41]  J. Gibbs,et al.  Moral Maturity: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection , 1991 .