A novel device for the study of somatosensory information processing

Current methods for applying multi-site vibratory stimuli to the skin typically involve the use of multiple, individual vibrotactile stimulators. Limitations of such an arrangement include difficulty with both positioning the stimuli as well as ensuring that stimuli are delivered in a synchronized and deliberate manner. Previously, we reported a two-site tactile stimulator that was developed in order to solve these problems (Tannan et al., 2007a). Due to both the success of that novel stimulator and the limitations that were inherent in that device, we designed and fabricated a four-site stimulator that provides a number of advantages over the previous version. First, the device can stimulate four independent skin sites and is primarily designed for stimulating the digit tips. Second, the positioning of the probe tips has been re-designed to provide better ergonomic hand placement. Third, the device is much more portable than the previously reported stimulator. Fourth, the stimulator head has a much smaller footprint on the table or surface where it resides. To demonstrate the capacity of the device for delivering tactile stimulation at four independent sites, a finger agnosia protocol, in the presence and absence of conditioning stimuli, was conducted on seventeen healthy control subjects. The study demonstrated that with increasing amplitudes of vibrotactile conditioning stimuli concurrent with the agnosia test, inaccuracies of digit identification increased, particularly at digits D3 and D4. The results are consistent with prior studies that implicated synchronization of adjacent and near-adjacent cortical ensembles with conditioning stimuli in impacting TOJ performance (Tommerdahl et al., 2007a,b).

[1]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Response of anterior parietal cortex to different modes of same-site skin stimulation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Determinants of patchy metabolic labeling in the somatosensory cortex of cats: a possible role for intrinsic inhibitory circuitry , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  A quantitative method for determining spatial discriminative capacity , 2008, Biomedical engineering online.

[4]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Ipsilateral Input Modifies the Primary Somatosensory Cortex Response to Contralateral Skin Flutter , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Baranek,et al.  Perceptual metrics of individuals with autism provide evidence for disinhibition , 2008, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[6]  V. Tannan,et al.  A portable tactile sensory diagnostic device , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Effects of high-frequency skin stimulation on SI cortex: mechanisms and functional implications. , 2005, Somatosensory & motor research.

[8]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Minicolumnar activation patterns in cat and monkey SI cortex. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  M Tommerdahl,et al.  Stimulus-dependent effects on tactile spatial acuity , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[10]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances amplitude discrimination. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R. Reitan,et al.  The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation , 1993 .

[13]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  The impact of non-noxious heat on tactile information processing , 2009, Brain Research.

[14]  M H Schieber,et al.  Quantifying the Independence of Human Finger Movements: Comparisons of Digits, Hands, and Movement Frequencies , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Absence of stimulus-driven synchronization effects on sensory perception in autism: Evidence for local underconnectivity? , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[16]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  A. Roe,et al.  Optical imaging of digit topography in individual awake and anesthetized squirrel monkeys , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  V. Tannan,et al.  Effects of the N-methyl-D-Aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on vibrotactile adaptation , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[19]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Optical imaging of intrinsic signals in somatosensory cortex , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  E. Francisco,et al.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber’s Law , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Evgenij Bobrowitsch,et al.  Digital stereophotogrammetry based on circular markers and zooming cameras: evaluation of a method for 3D analysis of small motions in orthopaedic research , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[22]  A. Burkitt,et al.  Exploring the tolerability of spatiotemporally complex electrical stimulation paradigms , 2011, Epilepsy Research.

[23]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Optical Imaging of a Tactile Illusion in Area 3b of the Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2003 .

[25]  M. Schlossberg The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation. , 1986 .

[26]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  An Undergraduate Laboratory Exercise to Study Weber’s Law , 2011, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[27]  Barry L. Whitsel,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances spatial localization , 2006, Brain Research.

[28]  M B Jones,et al.  Influences of low and high frequency oscillation upon spatio-tactile resolution. , 1970, Physiology & behavior.

[29]  V. Tannan,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation fails to enhance spatial localization in adults with autism , 2007, Brain Research.

[30]  Robert G. Dennis,et al.  Mesenchymal Cell Culture , 2002 .

[31]  John C Gore,et al.  High-Resolution Maps of Real and Illusory Tactile Activation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Individual Monkeys with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Optical Imaging , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  V. Tannan,et al.  A novel device for delivering two-site vibrotactile stimuli to the skin , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  S. Slobounov,et al.  Motor-related cortical potentials accompanying enslaving effect in single versus combination of fingers force production tasks , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Effects of stimulus-driven synchronization on sensory perception , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[35]  J. Chubbuck Small motion biological stimulator , 1966 .

[36]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Dynamic representations of the somatosensory cortex , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[37]  Anna W Roe,et al.  Responses of areas 3b and 1 in anesthetized squirrel monkeys to single- and dual-site stimulation of the digits. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  T. Boll Right and left cerebral hemisphere damage and tactile perception: performance of the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of the body. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Eric M. Francisco,et al.  Altered Central Sensitization in Subgroups of Women With Vulvodynia , 2011, The Clinical journal of pain.

[40]  V. Tannan,et al.  Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli , 2007, Brain Research.