Automation and computer-assisted planning for chemical synthesis

The molecules of today — the medicines that cure diseases, the agrochemicals that protect our crops, the materials that make life convenient — are becoming increasingly sophisticated thanks to advancements in chemical synthesis. As tools for synthesis improve, molecular architects can be bold and creative in the way they design and produce molecules. Several emerging tools at the interface of chemical synthesis and data science have come to the forefront in recent years, including algorithms for retrosynthesis and reaction prediction, and robotics for autonomous or high-throughput synthesis. This Primer covers recent additions to the toolbox of the data-savvy organic chemist. There is a new movement in retrosynthetic logic, predictive models of reactivity and chemistry automata, with considerable recent engagement from contributors in diverse fields. The promise of chemical synthesis in the information age is to improve the quality of the molecules of tomorrow through data-harnessing and automation. This Primer is written for organic chemists and data scientists looking to understand the software, hardware, data sets and tactics that are commonly used as well as the capabilities and limitations of the field. The Primer is split into three main components covering retrosynthetic logic, reaction prediction and automated synthesis. The former of these topics is about distilling the strategy of multistep synthesis to a logic that can be taught to a computer. The section on reaction prediction details modern tools and models for developing reaction conditions, catalysts and even new transformations based on information-rich data sets and statistical tools such as machine learning. Finally, we cover recent advances in the use of liquid handling robotics and autonomous systems that can physically perform experiments in the chemistry laboratory. This Primer summarizes the most relevant aspects of chemical synthesis in this information age for those looking to understand the software, hardware and data and how these are used to enable retrosynthetic logic, reaction prediction and automation.

[1]  W. Chan,et al.  Fmoc Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis: A Practical Approach (Practical Approach Series) , 2019 .

[2]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Nickel-Catalyzed Enantioselective Reductive Cross-Coupling of Styrenyl Aziridines. , 2017, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Li Gao,et al.  Acoustic Droplet Ejection Enabled Automated Reaction Scouting , 2019, ACS central science.

[4]  Constantine Bekas,et al.  “Found in Translation”: predicting outcomes of complex organic chemistry reactions using neural sequence-to-sequence models† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Time-split test set and example predictions, together with attention weights, confidence and token probabilities. See DO , 2017, Chemical science.

[5]  A. Maguire,et al.  Taming hazardous chemistry in flow: the continuous processing of diazo and diazonium compounds. , 2015, Chemistry.

[6]  William H. Green,et al.  Using Machine Learning To Predict Suitable Conditions for Organic Reactions , 2018, ACS central science.

[7]  J. Hartwig,et al.  Snap deconvolution: An informatics approach to high-throughput discovery of catalytic reactions , 2017, Science.

[8]  L. Hammett,et al.  Physical organic chemistry : reaction rates, equilibria, and mechanisms , 1940 .

[9]  Frank Glorius,et al.  Intermolecular reaction screening as a tool for reaction evaluation. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.

[10]  Tim Cernak,et al.  A map of the amine–carboxylic acid coupling system , 2020, Nature.

[11]  David C. Leitch,et al.  The power and accessibility of high-throughput methods for catalysis research , 2019, Nature Catalysis.

[12]  Reiner Sebastian Sprick,et al.  A mobile robotic chemist , 2020, Nature.

[13]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Data-science driven autonomous process optimization , 2020, Communications Chemistry.

[14]  Matthew S Sigman,et al.  Predictive and mechanistic multivariate linear regression models for reaction development , 2018, Chemical science.

[15]  William H. Green,et al.  Computer-Assisted Retrosynthesis Based on Molecular Similarity , 2017, ACS central science.

[16]  A. Johnson,et al.  Some recent progress in the development of the LHASA computer system for organic synthesis design: Starting‐material‐oriented retrosynthetic analysis , 1992 .

[17]  Riccardo Petraglia,et al.  Predicting retrosynthetic pathways using transformer-based models and a hyper-graph exploration strategy† , 2020, Chemical science.

[18]  Davidr . Evans,et al.  History of the Harvard ChemDraw project. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[19]  Yang Wang,et al.  Prediction of higher-selectivity catalysts by computer-driven workflow and machine learning , 2019, Science.

[20]  T. Cernak,et al.  Reaction miniaturization in eco-friendly solvents , 2018 .

[21]  Christopher J. Welch,et al.  High throughput analysis enables high throughput experimentation in pharmaceutical process research , 2019, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering.

[22]  Michael G. Hutchings,et al.  Route Design in the 21st Century: The ICSYNTH Software Tool as an Idea Generator for Synthesis Prediction , 2015 .

[23]  Mario Ellwart,et al.  Enantioselective Allenoate-Claisen Rearrangement using Chiral Phosphate Catalysts. , 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  Michel Chanon,et al.  Computer‐Aided Organic Synthesis – SESAM: A Simple Program to Unravel “Hidden” Restructured Starting Materials Skeleta in Complex Targets , 1998 .

[25]  R. Baker,et al.  High-throughput evaluation of in situ-generated cobalt(III) catalysts for acyl fluoride synthesis , 2017 .

[26]  Rebecca T. Ruck,et al.  Selective Hydrogen Atom Abstraction through Induced Bond Polarization: Direct α-Arylation of Alcohols through Photoredox, HAT, and Nickel Catalysis. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[27]  Richard Hoogenboom,et al.  Accelerating the living polymerization of 2-nonyl-2-oxazoline by implementing a microwave synthesizer into a high-throughput experimentation workflow. , 2005, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[28]  J. Hein,et al.  Automated solubility and crystallization analysis of non-UV active compounds: integration of evaporative light scattering detection (ELSD) and robotic sampling , 2019, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering.

[29]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[30]  R. Oslund,et al.  Microenvironment mapping via Dexter energy transfer on immune cells , 2020, Science.

[31]  Yang Liu,et al.  Route Designer: A Retrosynthetic Analysis Tool Utilizing Automated Retrosynthetic Rule Generation , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[32]  P. Walsh,et al.  Palladium-catalyzed C(sp3)-H arylation of diarylmethanes at room temperature: synthesis of triarylmethanes via deprotonative-cross-coupling processes. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[33]  B. Snider,et al.  Preparation of unsaturated .alpha.-chloro acids and intramolecular [2 + 2] cycloadditions of the chloroketenes derived from them , 1987 .

[34]  J. Dearden,et al.  QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to? , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[35]  Derek T. Ahneman,et al.  Predicting reaction performance in C–N cross-coupling using machine learning , 2018, Science.

[36]  Mike Preuss,et al.  Towards "AlphaChem": Chemical Synthesis Planning with Tree Search and Deep Neural Network Policies , 2017, ICLR.

[37]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language , 2019, Science.

[38]  Mike Preuss,et al.  Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI , 2017, Nature.

[39]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  ChemOS: An orchestration software to democratize autonomous discovery , 2020, PloS one.

[40]  Andrew F. Zahrt,et al.  Quantitative Structure-Selectivity Relationships in Enantioselective Catalysis: Past, Present, and Future. , 2019, Chemical reviews.

[41]  Steven H. Bertz,et al.  The first general index of molecular complexity , 1981 .

[42]  Aleksandra Baranczak,et al.  Integrated Platform for Expedited Synthesis-Purification-Testing of Small Molecule Libraries. , 2017, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[43]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Neural Networks for the Prediction of Organic Chemistry Reactions , 2016, ACS central science.

[44]  Stanislaw Jastrzebski,et al.  Molecule Edit Graph Attention Network: Modeling Chemical Reactions as Sequences of Graph Edits , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[45]  F. Glorius,et al.  Controlled iterative cross-coupling: on the way to the automation of organic synthesis. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[46]  Andreas Verras,et al.  Microscale High-Throughput Experimentation as an Enabling Technology in Drug Discovery: Application in the Discovery of (Piperidinyl)pyridinyl-1H-benzimidazole Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 1 Inhibitors. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[47]  Anirudh M. K. Nambiar,et al.  A multifunctional microfluidic platform for high-throughput experimentation of electroorganic chemistry. , 2020, Angewandte Chemie.

[48]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Self-referencing embedded strings (SELFIES): A 100% robust molecular string representation , 2019, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol..

[49]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  A universal system for digitization and automatic execution of the chemical synthesis literature , 2020, Science.

[50]  Andreas Dietz,et al.  Models, concepts, theories, and formal languages in chemistry and their use as a basis for computer assistance in chemistry , 1994, Journal of chemical information and computer sciences.

[51]  S. Buchwald,et al.  Pharmaceutical diversification via palladium oxidative addition complexes , 2019, Science.

[52]  J. Qin,et al.  Network Analysis Guided Synthesis of Weisaconitine D and Liljestrandinine , 2015, Nature.

[53]  W. A. WATERS,et al.  Physical Organic Chemistry: , 1941, Nature.

[54]  Sorelle A. Friedler,et al.  Experiment Specification, Capture and Laboratory Automation Technology (ESCALATE): a software pipeline for automated chemical experimentation and data management , 2019, MRS Communications.

[55]  S V Ley,et al.  Taming hazardous chemistry by continuous flow technology. , 2016, Chemical Society reviews.

[56]  S. Krska,et al.  The Evolution of Chemical High-Throughput Experimentation To Address Challenging Problems in Pharmaceutical Synthesis. , 2017, Accounts of chemical research.

[57]  Lin-Li Li,et al.  RASA: A Rapid Retrosynthesis-Based Scoring Method for the Assessment of Synthetic Accessibility of Drug-like Molecules , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[58]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity , 2018, Nature.

[59]  Daniel M. Lowe,et al.  Big Data from Pharmaceutical Patents: A Computational Analysis of Medicinal Chemists' Bread and Butter. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[60]  Klavs F. Jensen,et al.  Photoredox Iridium–Nickel Dual-Catalyzed Decarboxylative Arylation Cross-Coupling: From Batch to Continuous Flow via Self-Optimizing Segmented Flow Reactor , 2018 .

[61]  Exploring Homogeneous Conditions for Mild Buchwald–Hartwig Amination in Batch and Flow , 2020, Organic Process Research & Development.

[62]  Matthew S Sigman,et al.  Mechanism-Based Design of a High-Potential Catholyte Enables a 3.2 V All-Organic Nonaqueous Redox Flow Battery. , 2019, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[63]  Regina Barzilay,et al.  Analyzing Learned Molecular Representations for Property Prediction , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[64]  Nicholas A Cilfone,et al.  Enhancing Retrosynthetic Reaction Prediction with Deep Learning Using Multiscale Reaction Classification , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[65]  Christopher K Prier,et al.  Discovery of an α-Amino C–H Arylation Reaction Using the Strategy of Accelerated Serendipity , 2011, Science.

[66]  Tatsuya Takagi,et al.  Mordred: a molecular descriptor calculator , 2018, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[67]  J. Janey,et al.  Solubility Behaviors and Correlations of Common Organic Solvents , 2020 .

[68]  Daniel Reker,et al.  Adaptive Optimization of Chemical Reactions with Minimal Experimental Information , 2020, Cell Reports Physical Science.

[69]  A. Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials , 2019, Science Advances.

[70]  Christian Beecks,et al.  A Structure-Based Platform for Predicting Chemical Reactivity , 2019 .

[71]  Jonathan P. McMullen,et al.  Palladium-catalyzed amination reactions in flow: overcoming the challenges of clogging via acoustic irradiation , 2011 .

[72]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Automatic Generation of Complementary Descriptors with Molecular Graph Networks , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[73]  M. Burke,et al.  From synthesis to function via iterative assembly of N-methyliminodiacetic acid boronate building blocks. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.

[74]  Marwin H. S. Segler,et al.  Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict Reactions , 2016, Chemistry.

[75]  David A. Pensak,et al.  LHASA—Logic and Heuristics Applied to Synthetic Analysis , 1977 .

[76]  Xin Li,et al.  Predicting Regioselectivity in Radical C-H Functionalization of Heterocycles through Machine Learning. , 2020, Angewandte Chemie.

[77]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules , 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[78]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Mapping the dark space of chemical reactions with extended nanomole synthesis and MALDI-TOF MS , 2018, Science.

[79]  Ola Engkvist,et al.  Molecular representations in AI-driven drug discovery: a review and practical guide , 2020, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[80]  Gary A. Molander,et al.  Efficient cross-coupling of secondary alkyltrifluoroborates with aryl chlorides--reaction discovery using parallel microscale experimentation. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[81]  Dragos Horvath,et al.  Expert System for Predicting Reaction Conditions: The Michael Reaction Case , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[82]  Regina Barzilay,et al.  Learning Graph Models for Template-Free Retrosynthesis , 2020, ArXiv.

[83]  M. Burke,et al.  Multistep synthesis of complex boronic acids from simple MIDA boronates. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[84]  E. Corey,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis in organic synthesis. , 1985, Science.

[85]  Jolene P Reid,et al.  Holistic Prediction of Enantioselectivity in Asymmetric Catalysis , 2019, Nature.

[86]  J. N. Brönsted,et al.  Die katalytische Zersetzung des Nitramids und ihre physikalisch-chemische Bedeutung , 1924 .

[87]  Clara D. Christ,et al.  Mining Electronic Laboratory Notebooks: Analysis, Retrosynthesis, and Reaction Based Enumeration , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[88]  B. Murray,et al.  Enantiodivergent Pd-catalyzed C–C bond formation enabled through ligand parameterization , 2018, Science.

[89]  Noah P Tu,et al.  High-Throughput Reaction Screening with Nanomoles of Solid Reagents Coated on Glass Beads. , 2019, Angewandte Chemie.

[90]  Anthony P. F. Cook,et al.  Computer‐aided synthesis design: 40 years on , 2012 .

[91]  Piotr Dittwald,et al.  Computational planning of the synthesis of complex natural products , 2020, Nature.

[92]  T. Doi,et al.  A formal total synthesis of taxol aided by an automated synthesizer. , 2006, Chemistry, an Asian journal.

[93]  Paul Richardson,et al.  A platform for automated nanomole-scale reaction screening and micromole-scale synthesis in flow , 2018, Science.

[94]  Robert Langer,et al.  High throughput methods applied in biomaterial development and discovery. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[95]  D. Holdstock Past, present--and future? , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.

[96]  Alexandre Varnek,et al.  Automatized Assessment of Protective Group Reactivity: A Step Toward Big Reaction Data Analysis , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[97]  Matthew S Sigman,et al.  Multidimensional steric parameters in the analysis of asymmetric catalytic reactions. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[98]  Ling Li,et al.  The Evolution of High-Throughput Experimentation in Pharmaceutical Development and Perspectives on the Future , 2019, Organic Process Research & Development.

[99]  Michael Shevlin,et al.  Practical High-Throughput Experimentation for Chemists , 2017, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[100]  R. Paton,et al.  Conformational Effects on Physical-Organic Descriptors: The Case of Sterimol Steric Parameters , 2018, ACS Catalysis.

[101]  P. Walsh,et al.  Palladium-Catalyzed C(sp3)—H Arylation of Diarylmethanes at Room Temperature: Synthesis of Triarylmethanes via Deprotonative-Cross-Coupling Processes. , 2013 .

[102]  M. Francis,et al.  Discovery of Novel Catalysts for Alkene Epoxidation from Metal-Binding Combinatorial Libraries. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[103]  Ying Wang,et al.  Versatile Methods to Dispense Submilligram Quantities of Solids Using Chemical-Coated Beads for High-Throughput Experimentation , 2019, Organic Process Research & Development.

[104]  Tim Cernak,et al.  The medicinal chemist's toolbox for late stage functionalization of drug-like molecules. , 2016, Chemical Society reviews.

[105]  E J Corey,et al.  Computer-assisted design of complex organic syntheses. , 1969, Science.

[106]  Ambuj Tewari,et al.  Learning To Predict Reaction Conditions: Relationships between Solvent, Molecular Structure, and Catalyst , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[107]  J. Stewart,et al.  Instrument for automated synthesis of peptides. , 1966, Analytical chemistry.

[108]  Ian W. Davies,et al.  Discovery and mechanistic study of a photocatalytic indoline dehydrogenation for the synthesis of elbasvir† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed experimental procedures and characterization data for all new compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/c5sc03350k , 2015, Chemical science.

[109]  Alexander Golbraikh,et al.  Does Rational Selection of Training and Test Sets Improve the Outcome of QSAR Modeling? , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[110]  Benedikt M Wanner,et al.  Cartridge-based Automated Synthesis - A New Tool for the Synthetic Chemist. , 2020, Chimia.

[111]  David Rogers,et al.  Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[112]  Klavs F. Jensen,et al.  Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling optimization enabled by automated feedback , 2016, Reaction chemistry & engineering.

[113]  J. Gasteiger,et al.  Computer-assisted synthesis and reaction planning in combinatorial chemistry , 2000 .

[114]  Ola Engkvist,et al.  AiZynthFinder: a fast, robust and flexible open-source software for retrosynthetic planning , 2020, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[115]  Shane W. Krska,et al.  Late-stage functionalization of biologically active heterocycles through photoredox catalysis. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[116]  Christine L. Andrews,et al.  Nanoscale synthesis and affinity ranking , 2018, Nature.

[117]  Piotr Dittwald,et al.  Computer-Assisted Synthetic Planning: The End of the Beginning. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[118]  Connor W. Coley,et al.  SCScore: Synthetic Complexity Learned from a Reaction Corpus , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[119]  Murray Campbell,et al.  Deep Blue , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[120]  J. Morken,et al.  Thermographic selection of effective catalysts from an encoded polymer-bound library , 1998, Science.

[121]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  Fully Automated Chemical Synthesis: Toward the Universal Synthesizer , 2020 .

[122]  Jibo Wang,et al.  Context Aware Data-Driven Retrosynthetic Analysis , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[123]  Matthew H Todd,et al.  Computer-aided organic synthesis. , 2005, Chemical Society reviews.

[124]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[125]  Danail Bonchev,et al.  Statistical modelling of molecular descriptors in QSAR/QSPR , 2012 .

[126]  S. Nolan,et al.  Percent buried volume for phosphine and N-heterocyclic carbene ligands: steric properties in organometallic chemistry. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[127]  Sorelle A. Friedler,et al.  Anthropogenic biases in chemical reaction data hinder exploratory inorganic synthesis , 2019, Nature.

[128]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Automating drug discovery , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[129]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Automatic Chemical Design Using a Data-Driven Continuous Representation of Molecules , 2016, ACS central science.

[130]  Luigi Cavallo,et al.  A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study Examining the Binding of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHC) to the Cp*RuCl (Cp* = η5-C5Me5) Moiety: Insight into Stereoelectronic Differences between Unsaturated and Saturated NHC Ligands , 2003 .

[131]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  A Transformer Model for Retrosynthesis , 2019, ICANN.

[132]  Rainer Herges,et al.  Computer-assisted solution of chemical problems : the historical development and the present state of the art of a new discipline of chemistry , 1993 .

[133]  Paul M. Murray,et al.  The Application of Advanced Design ofExperiments for the Efficient Development ofChemical Processes , 2017 .

[134]  W. Todd Wipke,et al.  Artificial intelligence in organic synthesis. SST: starting material selection strategies. An application of superstructure search , 1984, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[135]  Rebecca E. Meadows,et al.  Rapid virtual screening of enantioselective catalysts using CatVS , 2018, Nature Catalysis.

[136]  Martin D Burke,et al.  The Molecular Industrial Revolution: Automated Synthesis of Small Molecules. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[137]  Christopher A. Hunter,et al.  Molecular Transformer: A Model for Uncertainty-Calibrated Chemical Reaction Prediction , 2018, ACS central science.

[138]  Connor W. Coley,et al.  A graph-convolutional neural network model for the prediction of chemical reactivity , 2018, Chemical science.

[139]  Alain C. Vaucher,et al.  Automated extraction of chemical synthesis actions from experimental procedures , 2020, Nature Communications.

[140]  Johann Gasteiger,et al.  Computer‐Assisted Planning of Organic Syntheses: The Second Generation of Programs , 1996 .

[141]  Pieter P. Plehiers,et al.  A robotic platform for flow synthesis of organic compounds informed by AI planning , 2019, Science.

[142]  Paul Raccuglia,et al.  Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments , 2016, Nature.

[143]  Maarten D. K. Boele,et al.  Selective Pd-catalyzed oxidative coupling of anilides with olefins through C-H bond activation at room temperature. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[144]  Piotr Dittwald,et al.  Efficient Syntheses of Diverse, Medicinally Relevant Targets Planned by Computer and Executed in the Laboratory , 2018 .

[145]  Marwin H. S. Segler,et al.  Machine learning the ropes: principles, applications and directions in synthetic chemistry. , 2020, Chemical Society reviews.

[146]  R. Kennedy,et al.  Droplet Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry for High Throughput Screening for Enzyme Inhibitors , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[147]  Marwin H. S. Segler,et al.  Neural-Symbolic Machine Learning for Retrosynthesis and Reaction Prediction. , 2017, Chemistry.

[148]  A. Dömling,et al.  Automated and Accelerated Synthesis of Indole Derivatives on a Nano-Scale. , 2019, Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC.

[149]  Rebecca T. Ruck,et al.  Selective functionalization of complex heterocycles via an automated strong base screening platform , 2017 .

[150]  G. É. Vléduts,et al.  Concerning one system of classification and codification of organic reactions , 1963, Inf. Storage Retr..

[151]  Regina Barzilay,et al.  Prediction of Organic Reaction Outcomes Using Machine Learning , 2017, ACS central science.

[152]  Klavs F. Jensen,et al.  Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling optimization enabled by automated feedback , 2016 .

[153]  David B. Damon,et al.  Collaborative Evaluation of Commercially Available Automated Powder Dispensing Platforms for High-Throughput Experimentation in Pharmaceutical Applications , 2018, Organic Process Research & Development.

[154]  N. Moitessier,et al.  From desktop to benchtop with automated computational workflows for computer-aided design in asymmetric catalysis , 2020, Nature Catalysis.

[155]  Stephen Hanessian,et al.  The psychobiological basis of heuristic synthesis planning - man, machine and the chiron approach , 1990 .

[156]  Andrew F. Zahrt,et al.  Development of a Computer-Guided Workflow for Catalyst Optimization. Descriptor Validation, Subset Selection, and Training Set Analysis. , 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[157]  Jun Qiu,et al.  High-Throughput Automation in Chemical Process Development. , 2017, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

[158]  Ola Engkvist,et al.  AI-assisted synthesis prediction. , 2019, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[159]  Connor W. Coley,et al.  Machine Learning in Computer-Aided Synthesis Planning. , 2018, Accounts of chemical research.

[160]  Matthew S. Sigman,et al.  Comparing quantitative prediction methods for the discovery of small-molecule chiral catalysts , 2018, Nature Reviews Chemistry.

[161]  Jianfeng Pei,et al.  Automatic retrosynthetic route planning using template-free models , 2020, Chemical science.

[162]  David A. Winkler,et al.  Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[163]  Kendall N Houk,et al.  Rapid catalyst identification for the synthesis of the pyrimidinone core of HIV integrase inhibitors. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[164]  Jonas Boström,et al.  Expanding the medicinal chemistry synthetic toolbox , 2018, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[165]  Christian Templin,et al.  40 Years on , 2017, European heart journal.

[166]  Guido Koch,et al.  A segmented flow platform for on-demand medicinal chemistry and compound synthesis in oscillating droplets. , 2017, Chemical communications.

[167]  Orr Ravitz,et al.  Data-driven computer aided synthesis design. , 2013, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[168]  Peter H Seeberger,et al.  Automated oligosaccharide synthesis. , 2008, Chemical Society reviews.

[169]  Allan M Jordan,et al.  The medicinal chemist's toolbox: an analysis of reactions used in the pursuit of drug candidates. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[170]  A. Filipa de Almeida,et al.  Synthetic organic chemistry driven by artificial intelligence , 2019, Nature Reviews Chemistry.

[171]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  An integrated microreactor system for self-optimization of a Heck reaction: from micro- to mesoscale flow systems. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[172]  S. Segawa,et al.  End of the beginning , 1990, Nature.

[173]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprints , 2015, NIPS.

[174]  Thierry Kogej,et al.  Generating Focused Molecule Libraries for Drug Discovery with Recurrent Neural Networks , 2017, ACS central science.

[175]  Bowen Liu,et al.  Retrosynthetic Reaction Prediction Using Neural Sequence-to-Sequence Models , 2017, ACS central science.

[176]  Ola Engkvist,et al.  Computational prediction of chemical reactions: current status and outlook. , 2018, Drug discovery today.

[177]  Kevin Bateman,et al.  Nanomole-scale high-throughput chemistry for the synthesis of complex molecules , 2015, Science.

[178]  M. Flanagan,et al.  Employing Photoredox Catalysis for DNA‐Encoded Chemistry: Decarboxylative Alkylation of α‐Amino Acids , 2018, ChemMedChem.

[179]  Demis Hassabis,et al.  Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search , 2016, Nature.