Effects of contracting on cost efficiency in US fixed-route bus transit service

Contracted service comprises a significant proportion of total operating expenses in the provision of fixed-route bus transit service in the US. Despite its importance, the literature on the economic effects of transit service contracting has been limited to only a few studies since the mid-1990s, and is inconclusive due to problems with the nature and methodology of the past studies. This paper examines how the cost efficiency of providing fixed-route bus transit service varies by the degree of contracting. I make several improvements to previous studies and conduct a regression analysis that: (1) addresses the endogeneity problem between the contracting decision and cost efficiency, (2) differentiates between agencies that contract out only a portion of service from those that contract out all service, (3) takes into account the moderating effects of several factors on the effect of contracting on cost efficiency, and (4) uses a relatively larger set of cross-sectional time-series data constructed from the National Transit Database from 1992 to 2000. The analysis results show that the combined effects of contracting lower operating costs by $4.09 and $2.89 per vehicle hour for partial and full-contracting agencies, respectively, in the average case. These average cost savings translate into 7.8% and 5.5%, using the average operating cost per vehicle hour of $53.06. However, this improvement is not universal, because the effects of contracting on cost efficiency vary by factors such as peak-to-base ratio, agency size, the wage gap between bus operators in the public and private sectors, and agency type.

[1]  Jonathan Cowie,et al.  Organisation form, scale effects and efficiency in the British bus industry , 1999 .

[2]  A. Markstedt,et al.  IMPACTS OF SUBSIDIES ON THE COSTS OF URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT , 1983 .

[3]  Edward K. Morlok.  ECONOMICS OF PRIVATE OPERATOR SERVICE , 1984 .

[4]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[5]  Gorman Gilbert,et al.  Measuring the performance of transit systems , 1978 .

[6]  Charles A. Lave.  Urban transit : the private challenge to public transportation , 1985 .

[7]  D. Pickrell.  RISING DEFICITS AND THE USES OF TRANSIT SUBSIDIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1985 .

[8]  Robert L Peskin,et al.  TRANSIT PRIVATIZATION IN DENVER: EXPERIENCE IN THE SECOND YEAR , 1993 .

[9]  Charles Lave,et al.  Measuring the Decline in Transit Productivity in the U.S. , 1991 .

[10]  J. Berechman.  COSTS, ECONOMIES OF SCALE AND FACTOR DEMAND IN BUS TRANSPORT , 1982 .

[11]  Rick D Halvosen.  Economic efficiency in transit service contracts : the role of contract structure , 1993 .

[12]  Kathryn Ann Foster,et al.  The Political Economy of Special-Purpose Government , 1997 .

[13]  B. Hirsch,et al.  Union Membership and Coverage Database from the Current Population Survey: Note , 2002 .

[14]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[15]  J S Wasson,et al.  IMPACTS OF PRIVATIZATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF URBAN TRANSIT SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[16]  John O'Looney,et al.  Outsourcing State and Local Government Services , 1998 .

[17]  E. Sclar,et al.  You don't always get what you pay for , 2000 .

[18]  Anthony R. Tomazinis,et al.  REDUCING THE COST OF PEAK HOUR TRANSIT SERVICE THROUGH CONTRACTING OUT SERVICE , 1989 .

[19]  Roger F Teal.  TRANSIT SERVICE CONTRACTING: EXPERIENCES AND ISSUES , 1985 .

[20]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Estimation and inference in econometrics , 1994 .

[21]  Kofi Obeng,et al.  The Intended Relationship Between Federal Operating Subsidy and Cost , 1995 .

[22]  J. Berechman.  Public transit economics and deregulation policy , 1993 .

[23]  Roger F Teal.  ISSUES RAISED BY COMPETITIVE CONTRACTING OF BUS TRANSIT SERVICE IN THE USA , 1991 .

[24]  Hiroyuki Iseki,et al.  Contracting Practice in Fixed-Route Transit Service: Case Studies in California , 2005 .

[25]  E K Morlok,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE COSTS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROVIDERS OF MASS TRANSIT , 1985 .

[26]  M. Karlaftis,et al.  OPERATING SUBSIDIES AND PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC TRANSIT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1998 .

[27]  Martin Wachs,et al.  Transit Service Contracting and Cost-Efficiency , 1997 .

[28]  Kofi Obeng,et al.  Specification of a long run transit cost function to estimate input bias from subsidies , 1994 .

[29]  James L. Perry,et al.  COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE IN URBAN BUS TRANSIT: ASSESSING PRIVATIZATION STRATEGIES , 1986 .

[30]  Ian Savage.  EVALUATION OF COMPETITION IN THE BRITISH LOCAL BUS INDUSTRY , 1986 .

[31]  M. Wachs.  U.S. Transit Subsidy Policy: In Need of Reform , 1989, Science.

[32]  John Vickers,et al.  Economic Perspectives on Privatization , 1991 .

[33]  Alan Black,et al.  Urban Mass Transportation Planning , 1995 .

[34]  Hiroyuki Iseki.  Economies of scale in bus transit service in the USA: How does cost efficiency vary by agency size and level of contracting? , 2008 .

[35]  Don H Pickrell,et al.  FEDERAL OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR URBAN MASS TRANSIT: ASSESSING A DECADE OF EXPERIENCE , 1986 .

[36]  Peter E. Kennedy.  A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[37]  Hiroyuki Iseki,et al.  Measuring Cost Variability in Provision of Transit Service , 2010 .

[38]  R. Cervero.  Examining The Performance Impacts of Transit Operating Subsidies , 1984 .

[39]  David R. Miller.  Differences among Cities, Differences among Firms, and Costs of Urban Bus Transport , 1970 .

[40]  Alan Black.  PRIVATIZATION OF URBAN TRANSIT: A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE , 1991 .

[41]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[42]  D. W. Jones,et al.  Urban Transit Policy: An Economic and Political History , 1985 .

[43]  K. H. Schaeffer,et al.  THE EMPEROR'S NEW CLOTHES: TRANSIT PRIVATIZATION AND PUBLIC POLICY , 1989 .