Water resources for agriculture in a changing climate: international case studies

This integrated study examines the implications of changes in crop water demand and water availability for the reliability of irrigation, taking into account changes in competing municipal and industrial demands, and explores the effectiveness of adaptation options in maintaining reliability. It reports on methods of linking climate change scenarios with hydrologic, agricultural, and planning models to study water availability for agriculture under changing climate conditions, to estimate changes in ecosystem services, and to evaluate adaptation strategies for the water resources and agriculture sectors. The models are applied to major agricultural regions in Argentina, Brazil, China, Hungary, Romania, and the US, using projections of climate change, agricultural production, population, technology, and GDP growth. For most of the relatively water-rich areas studied, there appears to be sufficient water for agriculture given the climate change scenarios tested. Northeastern China suffers from the greatest lack of water availability for agriculture and ecosystem services both in the present and in the climate change projections. Projected runoff in the Danube Basin does not change substantially, although climate change causes shifts in environmental stresses within the region. Northern Argentina's occasional problems in water supply for agriculture under the current climate may be exacerbated and may require investments to relieve future tributary stress. In Southeastern Brazil, future water supply for agriculture appears to be plentiful. Water supply in most of the US Cornbelt is projected to increase in most climate change scenarios, but there is concern for tractability in the spring and water-logging in the summer. Adaptation tests imply that only the Brazil case study area can readily accommodate an expansion of irrigated land under climate change, while the other three areas would suffer decreases in system reliability if irrigation areas were to be expanded. Cultivars are available for agricultural adaptation to the projected changes, but their demand for water may be higher than currently adapted varieties. Thus, even in these relatively water-rich areas, changes in water demand due to climate change effects on agriculture and increased demand from urban growth will require timely improvements in crop cultivars, irrigation and drainage technology, and water management.

[1]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Potential impact of climate change on world food supply , 1994, Nature.

[2]  William K. Johnson Accounting for Water Supply and Demand. An Application of Computer Program WEAP to the Upper Chattahoochee River Basin, Georgia. , 1994 .

[3]  D. Lobell,et al.  Climate and Management Contributions to Recent Trends in U.S. Agricultural Yields , 2003, Science.

[4]  Kenneth Strzepek,et al.  As climate changes : international impacts and implications , 1995 .

[5]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The second Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: model description, spinup and validation , 1997 .

[6]  Taro Takahashi,et al.  Climate processes and climate sensitivity , 1984 .

[7]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover , 1972 .

[8]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  Transient responses of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model to gradual changes of atmospheric CO2 , 1991 .

[9]  D. Tirpak,et al.  The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States , 1990 .

[10]  Elizabeth L. Chalecki,et al.  THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATIC CHANGES FOR WATER RESOURCES OF THE COLORADO AND SACRAMENTO‐SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASINS 1 , 1999 .

[11]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[12]  G. Boer,et al.  Warming asymmetry in climate change simulations , 2001 .

[13]  M. Hulme,et al.  Relative impacts of human-induced climate change and natural climate variability , 1999, Nature.

[14]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Increased crop damage in the US from excess precipitation under climate change , 2002 .

[15]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Time-dependent greenhouse warming computations with a coupled ocean-atmosphere model , 1993 .

[16]  G. Müller,et al.  The Scientific Basis , 1995 .

[17]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Implications of climate change for international agriculture : crop modeling study , 1994 .

[18]  Rollin H. Hotchkiss,et al.  IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON MISSOURI RWER BASIN WATER YIELD 1 , 2001 .

[19]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[20]  K. Strzepek,et al.  NEW METHODS OF MODELING WATER AVAILABILITY FOR AGRICULTURE UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE: THE U.S. CORNBELT 1 , 1999 .

[21]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  WEAP ("Water Evaluation And Planning" system) , 2005 .

[22]  D. Yates WatBal: an integrated water balance model for climate impact assessment of river basin runoff , 1996 .

[23]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[24]  Peter H. Gleick,et al.  Comprehensive Assessment of the Freshwater Resources of the World , 1997 .

[25]  J. M. Gregory,et al.  Climate response to increasing levels of greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols , 1995, Nature.

[26]  Smith Martin,et al.  Cropwat : a computer program for irrigation planning and management , 1992 .

[27]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[28]  David C. Major,et al.  Large-Scale Regional Water Resources Planning: The North Atlantic Regional Study , 1990 .

[29]  A. H. Hallett,et al.  Scanning the future: A long term scenario study of the world economy 1990-2015: Central Planning Bureau, 1992, (Sdu Publishers, The Hague), 246 pp., ISBN 9039902046 , 1993 .

[30]  Melvin J. Dubnick Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .