Proliferation of Academic Journals: Effects on Research Quantity and Quality

There have been significant structural changes in research markets in recent years reflected in the increase in the number of academic journals. This paper uses a differential game model of authors and journal editors to examine the effects of an increase in competition among academic journals. Does an increase in the number of academic journals lead to an increase in scholarly articles published? Will an increase in publishing outlets adversely affect research quality? The results show greater competition does not affect research output and in fact enhances research quality. The number of journals and the relative discount rates of authors and editors are crucial determinants of the effects of competition.

[1]  Price discrimination and economics journals , 1997 .

[2]  Michael Burton,et al.  Core journals: A reappraisal of the Diamond list , 1995 .

[3]  D. Hamermesh,et al.  Scholarships, Citations and Salaries: Economic Rewards in Economics , 1982 .

[4]  Will open access compete away monopoly profits in journal publishing , 2004 .

[5]  D. Colander.  Why Aren't Economists as Important as Garbagemen? , 1992 .

[6]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. , 1967, American sociological review.

[7]  David N. Laband,et al.  Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  D. Laband,et al.  The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970-1990 , 1994 .

[9]  Paula E. Stephan.  The Economics of Science , 1996 .

[10]  R. Tollison,et al.  Quality Control in Economics , 2002 .

[11]  S. Stigler,et al.  The Journals of Economics , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  C E Lipscomb.  Mergers in the publishing industry. , 2001, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[13]  Raymond D. Sauer,et al.  Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academia , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  B. Dollery,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF ECONOMICS: A MODEL OF RESEARCH DISCOURSE , 1993 .

[15]  Ofer H. Azar.  The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient? , 2005 .

[16]  O. Baser,et al.  The return of publications for economics faculty , 2003 .

[17]  O. Ashenfelter.  Report of the Editor: American Economic Review , 1999 .

[18]  A Market Mechanism for Scientific Communication: A Comment , 2003 .

[19]  William J. Bertin,et al.  Publish or Perish: What the Competition Is Really Doing , 1992 .

[20]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  The Editors and Authors of Economics Journals: A Case of Institutional Oligopoly? , 1999 .

[21]  Robert D. Tollison,et al.  Dry Holes in Economic Research , 2003 .

[22]  J. Faria.  What type of economist are you: r‐strategist or K‐strategist? , 2003 .

[23]  Rajeev K. Goel,et al.  Organization of Markets for Science and Technology , 2005 .

[24]  C. Garner,et al.  Academic Publication, Market Signaling, and Scientific Research Decisions , 1979 .

[25]  João Ricardo Faria,et al.  The Game Academics Play: Editors Versus Authors , 2005 .

[26]  Tom Coupé,et al.  What Do We Know About Ourselves? On the Economics of Economics , 2004 .

[27]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[28]  P. Howitt,et al.  Endogenous Growth Theory , 1999 .

[29]  Elda Pema,et al.  Publications over the academic life−cycle: evidence for academic economists , 2004 .