Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia

Neuropsychological studies with patients suffering from prosopagnosia have provided the main evidence for the hypothesis that the recognition of faces and objects rely on distinct mechanisms. Yet doubts remain, and it has been argued that no case demonstrating an unequivocal dissociation between face and object recognition exists due in part to the lack of appropriate response time measurements (Gauthier et al., 1999). We tested seven developmental prosopagnosics to measure their accuracy and reaction times with multiple tests of face recognition and compared this with a larger battery of object recognition tests. For our systematic comparison, we used an old/new recognition memory paradigm involving memory tests for cars, tools, guns, horses, natural scenes, and houses in addition to two separate tests for faces. Developmental prosopagnosic subjects performed very poorly with the face memory tests as expected. Four of the seven prosopagnosics showed a very strong dissociation between the face and object tests. Systematic comparison of reaction time measurements for all tests indicates that the dissociations cannot be accounted for by differences in reaction times. Contrary to an account based on speed accuracy tradeoffs, prosopagnosics were systematically faster in nonface tests than in face tests. Thus, our findings demonstrate that face and nonface recognition can dissociate over a wide range of testing conditions. This is further support for the hypothesis that face and nonface recognition relies on separate mechanisms and that developmental prosopagnosia constitutes a disorder separate from developmental agnosia.

[1]  E. Renzi Current Issues on Prosopagnosia , 1986 .

[2]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[3]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Too Many Trees to See the Forest: Performance, Event-related Potential, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Integrative Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  I. Biederman,et al.  Less impairment in face imagery than face perception in early prosopagnosia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  David K. A. Barnes,et al.  correction: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[6]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[7]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  E. Blass,et al.  The ontogeny of face recognition: eye contact and sweet taste induce face preference in 9- and 12-week-old human infants. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[10]  E. Blass,et al.  The ontogeny of face identity I. Eight- to 21-week-old infants use internal and external face features in identity , 2004, Cognition.

[11]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 2. Functional Neuroimaging Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  C. Koch,et al.  Category-specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Newborn infants prefer attractive faces , 1998 .

[14]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[15]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal emotion recognition in a prosopagnosic , 2003 .

[17]  N. Kanwisher Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  A. Young,et al.  Aspects of face processing , 1986 .

[19]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  AGNOSIA WITHOUT PROSOPAGNOSIA OR ALEXIA: EVIDENCE FOR STORED VISUAL MEMORIES SPECIFIC TO OBJECTS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[20]  B. de Gelder,et al.  Configural face processes in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia: evidence for two separate face systems? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[21]  P. Mcmullen,et al.  Apperceptive agnosia and face recognition , 2000 .

[22]  Andrea Weidenfeld,et al.  An evaluation of two commonly used tests of unfamiliar face recognition , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Katharina Henke,et al.  Specificity of Face Recognition: Recognition of Exemplars of Non-Face Objects In Prosopagnosia , 1998, Cortex.

[24]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[25]  A. Neuren Visual Agnosia , 1991, Neurology.

[26]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Cognitive Neuropsychology: Patterns of Co-occurrence Among the Associative Agnosias: Implications for Visual Object Representation , 1991 .

[27]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Specialized Face Perception Mechanisms Extract Both Part and Spacing Information: Evidence from Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  L Cipolotti,et al.  Fractionation of visual memory: agency detection and its impairment in autism , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Mother's face recognition by neonates: A replication and an extension , 1995 .

[30]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Finally, faces find favor , 2006 .

[31]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Face-selective Activation in a Congenital Prosopagnosic Subject , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  D. Bishop,et al.  Face perception in children with autism and Asperger's syndrome. , 1994, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[34]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[35]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Developmental disorders of vision. , 2003, Neurologic clinics.

[36]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[37]  Mariya V Cherkasova,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia: A study of three patients , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[38]  Alan Slater,et al.  The role of facial orientation in newborn infants’ preference for attractive faces , 2000 .

[39]  D. Rating,et al.  Prosopagnosia in a preschool child with Asperger syndrome. , 2003, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[40]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Dissociations of Visual Recognition in a Developmental Agnosic: Evidence for Separate Developmental Processes , 2003, Neurocase.

[42]  Brian J. Wiltgen,et al.  Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy , 2022 .

[43]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[44]  G. Sackett Monkeys Reared in Isolation with Pictures as Visual Input: Evidence for an Innate Releasing Mechanism , 1966, Science.

[45]  M. Tarr,et al.  Learning to see faces and objects , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Semantic Processing Precedes Affect Retrieval: The Neurological Case for Cognitive Primacy in Visual Processing , 2006 .

[47]  T. Field,et al.  Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. , 1982, Science.

[48]  J. Moake,et al.  This article has been cited by other articles , 2003 .

[49]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[51]  M. Farah,et al.  EARLY COMMITMENT OF NEURAL SUBSTRATES FOR FACE RECOGNITION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[52]  Joachim Bodamer,et al.  Die Prosop-Agnosie , 2004, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[53]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal Greeble Learning in a Severe Case of Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2004, Neuron.

[54]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[56]  I. Bushnell Discrimination of faces by young infants. , 1982, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[57]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[58]  S. Carey,et al.  Development of face recognition: A maturational component? , 1980 .

[59]  Beatrice de Gelder,et al.  Impaired face and body perception in developmental prosopagnosia , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[61]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[62]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal Recognition of Emotion in a Prosopagnosic , 2003, Perception.

[63]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[64]  H. McConachie,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia. A Single Case Report , 1976, Cortex.

[65]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia with normal configural processing , 2000, Neuroreport.

[66]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[67]  L. Deouell,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia , 1999 .

[68]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[69]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[70]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  R. Pearson,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: Should it be Taken at Face Value? , 2001, Neurocase.

[72]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  BORB: Birmingham Object Recognition Battery , 2017 .

[73]  Nouchine Hadjikhani,et al.  Neural basis of prosopagnosia: An fMRI study , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[74]  Robert D. Jones,et al.  Severe Developmental Prosopagnosia in a Child With Superior Intellect , 2001, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[75]  E. D. de Haan,et al.  A familial factor in the development of face recognition deficits. , 1999, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[76]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[77]  Verne S. Caviness,et al.  Prosopagnosia as a Deficit in Encoding Curved Surface , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[78]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[79]  U. Frith,et al.  Fractionation of visual memory: Evidence from a case with multiple neurodevelopmental impairments , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[80]  D. Levine,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A defect in visual configural processing , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[81]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face inversion and contrast-reversal effects across development: in contrast to the expertise theory. , 2004, Developmental science.

[82]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .