This paper presents preliminary results obtained with the use of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) technique as part of a cochlear implant candidacy assessment protocol for infants. Fifteen infants (30 ears), between 10 and 60 months of age, with severe-to-profound hearing loss participated in the study. ASSR measurements were performed for 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz at intensities up to 120–128 dB HL. The ASSR thresholds were obtained in 74% of the measurements, and exceeded the maximum auditory brainstem response (ABR) intensity output in 91% of cases and the maximum free-field behavioral intensity output in 84% of cases. Eighty-seven per cent of ASSR threshold measurements were measured at intensities of 100 dB HL or higher, and almost half (47%) were measured at intensities of 115 dB HL and higher. Preliminary results indicate that absent ABR and behavioral thresholds do not preclude the possibility of residual hearing, making the ASSR a primary source of information regarding profound levels of hearing loss. Sumario Este trabajo presenta los resultados preliminares obtenidos con el uso de la técnica de respuestas auditivas de estado estable (ASSR) como parte de un protocolo de evaluación de elegibilidad de candidatos infantiles para implante coclear. Participaron en el estudio quince infantes (30 oídos) entre los 10 y los 60 meses de edad, con hipoacusia severa a profunda. Se realizaron mediciones de ASSR en 0.5, 1, 2 y 4 kHz, a intensidades de 120–128 dB HL. Los umbrales de las ASSR se obtuvieron en el 74% de las mediciones, y excedieron la intensidad máxima de salida para las respuestas auditivas de tallo cerebral (ABR) en el 91% de los casos y la intensidad máxima de salida para el campo libre conductual en el 84% de los casos. Ochenta y ocho por ciento de los umbrales de las ASSR se midieron a intensidades de 100 ó más dB HL, y casi la mitad (47%) fue medida a intensidades de 115 ó más dB HL. Los estudios preliminares indican que la ausencia de ABR y de umbrales conductuales no excluye la existencia de audición residual, convirtiendo las ASSR en una fuente primaria de información para pérdidas auditivas de nivel profundo.
[1]
J G Clark,et al.
Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification.
,
1981,
ASHA.
[2]
Y. Sininger.
Changing Considerations for Cochlear Implant Candidacy : Age , Hearing Level and Auditory Neuropathy
,
2002
.
[3]
J. Tyberghein,et al.
Hearing in children.
,
1984,
Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica.
[4]
S. Arlinger.
AUDIOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS OF INFANTS
,
2000
.
[5]
G M Clark,et al.
The Automated Prediction of Hearing Thresholds in Sleeping Subjects Using Auditory Steady‐State Evoked Potentials
,
1995,
Ear and hearing.
[6]
Christine Yoshinaga-Itano,et al.
Language of Early- and Later-identified Children With Hearing Loss
,
1998,
Pediatrics.
[7]
S. Mason,et al.
Assessment of Aided ABR Thresholds before Cochlear Implantation
,
2000,
British journal of audiology.
[8]
Welfare Agencies,et al.
Year 2000 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs.
,
2000,
American journal of audiology.
[9]
G M Clark,et al.
Steady‐State Evoked Potential and Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Group of Children with Absent Click‐Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Response
,
1998,
Ear and hearing.
[10]
T W Picton,et al.
Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses.
,
1998,
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[11]
D. Stapells,et al.
Auditory Brainstem Response Estimates of The Pure-Tone Audiogram: Current Status
,
1998
.
[12]
G M Clark,et al.
A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans.
,
1991,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13]
Terence W. Picton,et al.
Frequency‐Specific Audiometry Using Steady‐State Responses
,
1996,
Ear and hearing.
[14]
Deborah Hayes,et al.
Handbook of Clinical Audiology (4th ed.)
,
1994
.
[15]
N Marangos,et al.
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
,
1976,
The Lancet.