Managing knowledge exchange and identification in age diverse teams

Purpose – This paper aims to examine the impact of individual and group-level variables on knowledge exchange and identification in age diverse teams. From a diversity perspective, influences of age-related diversity perceptions and diversity beliefs (level 1) are compared with effects of objective age diversity (level 2). From a management perspective, the paper goes beyond age diversity and investigates the incremental effects of team and individual characteristics from a team learning perspective. Design/methodology/approach – Questionnaire data of 516 team members and their supervisors in 73 organizational teams were analyzed in a multilevel approach. Findings – Objective age diversity had a negative effect on knowledge exchange and identification. Beyond that, age-related diversity perceptions and positive diversity beliefs on the individual level predict the effect of objective diversity. Relativizing the impact of diversity, individual characteristics (knowing the team experts, clear understanding ...

[1]  M. Nagy.  Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction , 2002 .

[2]  John R. Austin.  Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  Improving work motivation and performance in brainstorming groups: The effects of three group goal-setting strategies , 2005 .

[4]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[5]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[6]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[7]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity , 2002 .

[10]  T. Ellwart,et al.  Wissensverteilung und Wissenskoordination in Gruppen , 2007 .

[11]  Martin Hoegl,et al.  Team leadership activities in different project phases , 2002 .

[12]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus , 1999 .

[13]  John M. Ivancevich,et al.  ‘Bars’ Performance Rating for Sales Force Personnel , 1978 .

[14]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[15]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes , 2001 .

[16]  Bertolt Meyer,et al.  When beliefs are not enough: Examining the interaction of diversity faultlines, task motivation, and diversity beliefs on team performance , 2012 .

[17]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[18]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[19]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Team-based rewards in computer-mediated groups. , 2011 .

[20]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[21]  Paul E. Spector.  Method Variance in Organizational Research , 2006 .

[22]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  M. Platow,et al.  Unity Through Diversity: Value-in-Diversity Beliefs, Work Group Diversity, and Group Identification , 2007 .

[24]  W. Bevan,et al.  The Negro stereotype and perceptual accentuation. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  H. Reis,et al.  Attraction and close relationships. , 1998 .

[26]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Susan E. Jackson,et al.  Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. , 1991 .

[28]  L. Shore,et al.  Age Discrimination in the Workplace , 2013 .

[29]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making : When and why does it work? , 2009 .

[30]  Felicia Pratto,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and perceptual selection , 1986 .

[31]  Bertolt Meyer,et al.  Social Category Salience Moderates the Effect of Diversity Faultlines on Information Elaboration , 2011 .

[32]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future , 2007 .

[33]  W. Hacker.  Action Regulation Theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? , 2003 .

[34]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[35]  M. Frese,et al.  Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. , 1994 .

[36]  James A. Pharmer,et al.  When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams , 2000 .

[37]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social Identity, Self-categorization, and Work Motivation: Rethinking the Contribution of the Group to Positive and Sustainable Organisational Outcomes , 2000 .

[38]  Ruth Kanfer,et al.  Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: the role of task complexity and group size. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. , 1992 .

[40]  F. Dochy,et al.  Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations , 2010 .

[41]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[42]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[43]  M. Posner.  Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. 2nd ed. , 1977 .

[44]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .

[45]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[46]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[47]  W DreudeC.K.,et al.  Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse work groups , 2007 .

[48]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[49]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[50]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams , 2008 .

[51]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Single-Item Reliability: A Replication and Extension , 2001 .

[52]  John M. Ivancevich,et al.  'Bars' Performance Rating for Sales Force Personnel , 1978 .

[53]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[54]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intra-group differences, and performance of diverse work groups , 2008 .

[55]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  Psychology in Organizations: The Social-Identity Approach , 2000 .

[56]  K. Schmidt,et al.  Konsequenzen des demographischen Wandels für das Management von Humanressourcen , 2007 .

[57]  William H. Glick,et al.  Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? , 1998 .

[58]  Kyle Lewis.  Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Believing shapes seeing: The impact of diversity beliefs on the construal of group composition , 2010 .

[60]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[61]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User’s Guide , 2002 .

[62]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[63]  S. K. Horwitz,et al.  The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography , 2007 .

[64]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[65]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Dealing with Discrepant Expectations: Response Strategies and Managerial Effectiveness , 1995 .

[66]  Michael A. West,et al.  Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams , 2000 .

[67]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[68]  Felix C. Brodbeck,et al.  Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs , 2008 .

[69]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Work group diversity. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[70]  S. Webber,et al.  Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[71]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[72]  Elizabeth Chambers,et al.  The war for talent , 2001, Tijdschrift voor HRM.

[73]  R. Loo.  A caveat on using single‐item versus multiple‐item scales , 2002 .

[74]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Discrimination at Work : The Psychological and Organizational Bases , 2005 .

[75]  A. Edmondson,et al.  6 Three Perspectives on Team Learning: Outcome Improvement, Task Mastery, and Group Process , 2007 .

[76]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[77]  D. Abrams,et al.  An age apart: the effects of intergenerational contact and stereotype threat on performance and intergroup bias. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[78]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[79]  Heike Bruch,et al.  Age Diversity, Age Discrimination Climate and Performance Consequences - a Cross Organizational Study , 2011 .

[80]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[81]  M. West.  Reflexivity and work group effectiveness:a conceptual integration , 1996 .

[82]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes , 2010 .

[83]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[84]  B. Rosen,et al.  Too Old or Not Too Old. , 1977 .

[85]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[86]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[87]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[88]  P. Hom,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium , 2000 .

[89]  S. Schneider,et al.  Experiencing Diversity, Conflict, and Emotions in Teams , 2003 .

[90]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[91]  K. Schmidt,et al.  Die Rolle von Alterssalienz und Konflikten in Teams als Mediatoren der Beziehung zwischen Altersheterogenität und Gruppeneffektivität , 2010 .