There remains some debate regarding secondary task distractions, such as cell phones, as a risk factor in traffic crashes and their relative risk compared to existing factors, such as engagement in common in-vehicle tasks and alcohol impairment. Moreover, studies of driver impairment often investigate single risk factors rather than combined factors (e.g. distraction task while drunk). This study compared non-distracted driving in a motion-based driving simulator to distracted driving (hands-free cell phone conversations, common in-vehicle tasks) either while sober or combined with alcohol (BAC 0.08). The results indicated that during a car following scenario, drivers engaged in the conversations or completing in-vehicle tasks were more impaired than drivers that were not involved in any distraction task. Indeed, both the cell phone and in-vehicle sources of distraction were generally more impairing than intoxication at the legal limit.
[1]
J. Havard.
Alcohol and the driver.
,
1978,
British medical journal.
[2]
Monica M. Glumm,et al.
Cognitive Workload while Driving and Talking on a Cellular Phone or to a Passenger
,
2000
.
[3]
Karel Brookhuis,et al.
MEASURING DRIVING PERFORMANCE BY CAR-FOLLOWING IN TRAFFIC
,
1994
.
[4]
Dick de Waard,et al.
Quantifying Car following Performance as a Metric for Primary and Secondary (Distraction) Task Load: Part A — Modification of Task Parameters
,
2003
.
[5]
Erwin Roeland Boer.
Behavioral Entropy as an Index of Workload
,
2000
.
[6]
Giulio Ponte,et al.
Volume 1 - Findings
,
1997
.