The reporting of observational studies of drug effectiveness and safety: recommendations to extend existing guidelines

ABSTRACT Introduction The use of observational data to assess drug effectiveness and safety can provide relevant information, much of which may not be feasible to obtain through randomized clinical trials. Because observational studies provide critical drug safety and effectiveness information that influences drug policy and prescribing practices, transparent, consistent, and accurate reporting of these studies is critical. Areas Covered We provide recommendations to extend existing reporting guidelines, covering the main components of primary research studies (methods, results, discussion). Expert Opinion Our recommendations include extending drug safety and effectiveness guidelines to include explicit checklist items on: study registration, causal diagrams, rationale for measures of effect, comprehensive assessment of bias, comprehensive data cleaning steps, drug equivalents, subject-level drug data visualization, sex and gender-based analyses and results, patient-oriented outcomes, and patient involvement in research.

[1]  M. Rezaeian Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research , 2019 .

[2]  F. Geisler,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Neurologic Safety of Acute Baclofen Use After Spinal Cord Injury , 2019, Neurotherapeutics.

[3]  L. Lynd,et al.  Use of biologics during pregnancy and risk of serious infections in the mother and baby: a Canadian population-based cohort study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[4]  Olaf Klungel,et al.  The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE) , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[5]  O. Hankivsky,et al.  Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research , 2018, Research Integrity and Peer Review.

[6]  N. Qizilbash,et al.  A review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of risk minimisation measures in Europe using the European Union electronic Register of Post‐Authorization Studies , 2018, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[7]  S. Schroter,et al.  Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study , 2018, BMJ Open.

[8]  Harold C. Sox,et al.  Recommendations for Good Procedural Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment Effectiveness and/or Comparative Effectiveness Designed to Inform Health Care Decisions: Report of the Joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on Real-World Evidence in Health Care Decision Making , 2017 .

[9]  G. Collins,et al.  Handling time varying confounding in observational research , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[10]  L. Lynd,et al.  The Impact of Statin Drug Use on All‐Cause Mortality in Patients With COPD: A Population‐Based Cohort Study , 2017, Chest.

[11]  David Madigan,et al.  Good practices for real‐world data studies of treatment and/or comparative effectiveness: Recommendations from the joint ISPOR‐ISPE Special Task Force on real‐world evidence in health care decision making , 2017, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[12]  D. G. Altman,et al.  GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research , 2017, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[13]  M. Orho-Melander,et al.  Type 2 diabetes, adiposity and cancer morbidity and mortality risk taking into account competing risk of noncancer deaths in a prospective cohort setting , 2017, International journal of cancer.

[14]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Adjusted Analyses in Studies Addressing Therapy and Harm: Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature , 2017, JAMA.

[15]  N. Jewell,et al.  Case–control matching: effects, misconceptions, and recommendations , 2017, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[16]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration , 2016, BMJ Open.

[17]  Jessie K. Edwards,et al.  Methodologic Issues when Estimating Risks in Pharmacoepidemiology , 2016, Current Epidemiology Reports.

[18]  C. Chambers,et al.  Constructing Causal Diagrams for Common Perinatal Outcomes: Benefits, Limitations and Motivating Examples with Maternal Antidepressant Use in Pregnancy. , 2016, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[19]  David Moher,et al.  CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  Kit C.B. Roes,et al.  Methods to control for unmeasured confounding in pharmacoepidemiology: an overview , 2016, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

[21]  Susan Michie,et al.  Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature , 2016, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[22]  Melissa C Brouwers,et al.  The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[23]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Inverse probability weighting , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[24]  David Moher,et al.  The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting Guidelines , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Real world effectiveness of warfarin among ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation: observational analysis from Patient-Centered Research into Outcomes Stroke Patients Prefer and Effectiveness Research (PROSPER) study , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  O. Hanon,et al.  Antihypertensive Drugs, Prevention of Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analyses, with Discussion of Potential Mechanisms , 2015, CNS Drugs.

[27]  Clement J. McDonald,et al.  Visualization of Patient Prescription History Data in Emergency Care , 2014, AMIA.

[28]  Bridget C. O’Brien,et al.  Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[29]  Estimation of Drug Effectiveness by Modeling Three Time-Dependent Covariates: An Application to Data on Cardioprotective Medications in the Chronic Dialysis Population , 2014, Statistics in biopharmaceutical research.

[30]  D. Moher,et al.  The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  M. Drummond,et al.  Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. , 2013, BMJ.

[32]  D. Rennie,et al.  SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. , 2013, Annals of internal medicine.

[33]  K. Meador,et al.  Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure and cognitive outcomes at age 6 years (NEAD study): a prospective observational study , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[34]  Samy Suissa,et al.  Metformin and the Risk of Cancer , 2012, Diabetes Care.

[35]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology — Molecular Epidemiology STROBE-ME: an extension of the STROBE statement [J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(12):1350–1363] , 2012 .

[36]  Rebecca M. Jordan-Young,et al.  Beyond a catalogue of differences: a theoretical frame and good practice guidelines for researching sex/gender in human health. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[37]  Joy L. Johnson,et al.  Sex and gender reporting in health research: why Canada should be a leader. , 2012, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[38]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  The importance of direct patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a patient perspective. , 2011, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[39]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology – Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): An Extension of the STROBE Statement , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[40]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  WITHDRAWN: CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010 .

[41]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology - Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement. , 2011, Preventive medicine.

[42]  C. Clarke,et al.  Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson's disease , 2010, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[43]  Tony Tse,et al.  Registration of observational studies: Is it time? , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[44]  Gordon B. Drummond,et al.  ARRIVE: new guidelines for reporting animal research , 2010, Experimental physiology.

[45]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments: The ARRIVE Guidelines , 2010, British journal of pharmacology.

[46]  R. Bender,et al.  Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[47]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMC medicine.

[48]  Ethan Basch,et al.  The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[49]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[50]  Trish Groves,et al.  Registration of observational studies , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[51]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[52]  S. Cole,et al.  Overadjustment Bias and Unnecessary Adjustment in Epidemiologic Studies , 2009, Epidemiology.

[53]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[54]  R. Tannen,et al.  Use of primary care electronic medical record database in drug efficacy research on cardiovascular outcomes: comparison of database and randomised controlled trial findings , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[55]  D. Mattison,et al.  Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics , 2009, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[56]  Ian Shrier,et al.  Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs , 2008 .

[57]  S. Suissa Immeasurable time bias in observational studies of drug effects on mortality. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[58]  C. Rutter,et al.  De Facto Long-term Opioid Therapy for Noncancer Pain , 2008, The Clinical journal of pain.

[59]  Iveta Simera,et al.  EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research , 2008, Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.

[60]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, BMJ.

[61]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[62]  Bart Post,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Clinimetrics , clinical profile and prognosis in early Parkinson ’ s disease , 2009 .

[63]  M. Levine,et al.  Outcomes of dosage adjustments used to manage antiretroviral drug interactions. , 2007, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[64]  J. Magaziner,et al.  Inappropriate Drug Use and Risk of Transition to Nursing Homes Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults , 2006, Medical care.

[65]  D. Goldfarb Patients at the centre: in our practice, and in our use of language , 2004, ACP journal club.

[66]  C. Fletcher,et al.  Antiviral dynamics and sex differences of zidovudine and lamivudine triphosphate concentrations in HIV-infected individuals , 2003, AIDS.

[67]  David Moher,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[68]  J. Olsen,et al.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding among users of NSAIDs: a population-based cohort study in Denmark. , 2002, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[69]  Robert E. Anderson,et al.  Accuracy in equianalgesic dosing. conversion dilemmas. , 2001, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[70]  M. Stewart Towards a global definition of patient centred care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[71]  A. Hartz,et al.  A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[72]  M Schulzer,et al.  Reporting risks and benefits of therapy by use of the concepts of unqualified success and unmitigated failure: applications to highly cited trials in cardiovascular medicine. , 1999, Circulation.

[73]  M. Schulzer,et al.  'Unqualified success' and 'unmitigated failure': number-needed-to-treat-related concepts for assessing treatment efficacy in the presence of treatment-induced adverse events. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.