Are female scientists less inclined to publish alone? The gender solo research gap
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[2] Arthur Schram,et al. Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work , 2015 .
[3] M. Kwiek,et al. Gender-Based Homophily in Research: A Large-Scale Study of Man-Woman Collaboration , 2020, J. Informetrics.
[4] Traci Sitzmann,et al. The Hidden Cost of Prayer: Religiosity and the Gender Wage Gap (Online Supplement) , 2020 .
[5] M. F. Fox. Gender, science, and academic rank: Key issues and approaches , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.
[6] B. Jayabalasingham,et al. The researcher journey through a gender lens , 2020 .
[7] Troy A. Heffernan. Academic networks and career trajectory: ‘There’s no career in academia without networks’ , 2020 .
[8] João M. Santos,et al. Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia , 2020 .
[9] Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al. Task specialization across research careers , 2020, bioRxiv.
[10] M. Kwiek. The prestige economy of higher education journals: a quantitative approach , 2020 .
[11] Giovanni Abramo,et al. Comparison of research performance of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities , 2020, J. Informetrics.
[12] Carlos Vílchez-Román,et al. Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: a literature review , 2020, Social Psychology of Education.
[13] Marek Kwiek,et al. Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource-poor system , 2020, Scientometrics.
[14] Marek Kwiek,et al. What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: changing national patterns in global contexts , 2020, Studies in Higher Education.
[15] Rima Wilkes,et al. The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men’s) published research , 2020, PloS one.
[16] M. Thelwall. Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996–2014 , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.
[17] Marzena Feldy,et al. The Ethos of Science and the Perception of the Polish System of Financing Science , 2020, European Review.
[18] M. Kwiek,et al. Gender Disparities in International Research Collaboration: A Large-scale Bibliometric Study of 25, 000 University Professors , 2020, ArXiv.
[19] M. Kwiek,et al. GENDER DISPARITIES IN INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH COLLABORATION: A STUDY OF 25,000 UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS , 2020, Journal of Economic Surveys.
[20] Emanuel Kulczycki,et al. Breaking the deadlock of mistrust? A participative model of the structural reforms in higher education in Poland , 2020 .
[21] Emanuel Kulczycki,et al. Researchers publishing monographs are more productive and more local-oriented , 2020, Scientometrics.
[22] G. Madison,et al. Sex differences in the number of scientific publications and citations when attaining the rank of professor in Sweden , 2020, Studies in Higher Education.
[23] Brian K. Ryu. The Demise of Single-Authored Publications in Computer Science: A Citation Network Analysis , 2020, ArXiv.
[24] David J. Samuels,et al. Gender Gaps in Perceptions of Political Science Journals , 2019, PS: Political Science & Politics.
[25] Albert-László Barabási,et al. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[26] M. Kwiek,et al. Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Poland , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions.
[27] Luis Sanz Menéndez,et al. Grant Allocation Disparities from a Gender Perspective: Literature Review. Synthesis Report , 2020 .
[28] K. A. Walker. Females Are First Authors, Sole Authors, and Reviewers of Entomology Publications Significantly Less Often Than Males , 2019, Annals of the Entomological Society of America.
[29] M. Shaw. Strategic instrument or social institution: Rationalized myths of the university in stakeholder perceptions of higher education reform in Poland , 2019, International Journal of Educational Development.
[30] Karin Hoisl,et al. Homophily, Biased Attention, and the Gender Gap in Science , 2019, Academy of Management Proceedings.
[31] Ellen M. Key,et al. You Research Like a Girl: Gendered Research Agendas and Their Implications , 2019, PS: Political Science & Politics.
[32] Giovanni Abramo,et al. Comparison of research productivity of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities , 2019, ArXiv.
[33] D. Aksnes,et al. Gender gaps in international research collaboration: a bibliometric approach , 2019, Scientometrics.
[34] Giovanni Abramo,et al. A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy , 2019, Scientometrics.
[35] Mike Thelwall,et al. Gender differences in research areas, methods and topics: Can people and thing orientations explain the results? , 2019, J. Informetrics.
[36] I-Jung Grace Lu. Changing European Academics: A Comparative Study of Social Stratification, Work Patterns and Research Productivity , 2018, Higher Education Evaluation and Development.
[37] Ted Enamorado,et al. Using a Probabilistic Model to Assist Merging of Large-Scale Administrative Records , 2018, American Political Science Review.
[38] Vincent Larivière,et al. Making it personal: Examining personalization patterns of single-authored papers , 2019, ISSI.
[39] Gali Halevi,et al. Bibliometric Studies on Gender Disparities in Science , 2019, Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators.
[40] Vincent Larivière,et al. Man-woman collaboration behaviors and scientific visibility: does gender affect the academic impact in economics and management? , 2019, ISSI.
[41] C. Macneil. ‘One is the loneliest number’; are we witnessing the death throes of the single-author research paper in the field of biological invasions? , 2019, Management of Biological Invasions.
[42] Carmel M. Diezmann,et al. Women Professors , 2019 .
[43] Aldona Tomczyńska,et al. The Ethos of Science in Contemporary Poland , 2018, Minerva.
[44] Marjo‐Riitta Diehl,et al. Why women build less effective networks than men: The role of structural exclusion and personal hesitation , 2018, Human Relations.
[45] Agnieszka Olechnicka,et al. The Geography of Scientific Collaboration , 2018 .
[46] Vetle I. Torvik,et al. Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender , 2018, PloS one.
[47] M. Kwiek. Changing European Academics , 2018 .
[48] L. Holman,et al. Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences , 2018, bioRxiv.
[49] Marek Kwiek,et al. International Research Collaboration and International Research Orientation: Comparative Findings About European Academics , 2018 .
[50] Carl T. Bergstrom,et al. The Science of Science , 2018, Science.
[51] Marek Kwiek,et al. Academic top earners. Research productivity, prestige generation, and salary patterns in European universities , 2018 .
[52] Marek Kwiek,et al. High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers? , 2018, Scientometrics.
[53] Mohsen Jadidi,et al. Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists , 2017, Adv. Complex Syst..
[54] Giovanni Abramo,et al. Selection committees for academic recruitment: does gender matter? , 2015, ArXiv.
[55] Vincent Larivière,et al. Gender homophily in citations , 2018 .
[56] Michael Bode,et al. On the extinction of the single-authored paper : the causes and consequences of increasingly collaborative applied ecological research. , 2018 .
[57] Mary Frank Fox,et al. International research collaboration among women engineers: frequency and perceived barriers, by regions , 2016, The Journal of Technology Transfer.
[58] Katherine Weisshaar,et al. Publish and Perish?: An Assessment of Gender Gaps in Promotion to Tenure in Academia , 2017 .
[59] Lauren A. Rivera. When Two Bodies Are (Not) a Problem: Gender and Relationship Status Discrimination in Academic Hiring , 2017 .
[60] Ulf Sandström,et al. Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact , 2017, PloS one.
[61] Harvey Goldstein,et al. Challenges in administrative data linkage for research , 2017, Big Data Soc..
[62] Heather Sarsons,et al. Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia , 2017 .
[63] M. Potthoff,et al. Is there a gender-based fragmentation of communication science? An investigation of the reasons for the apparent gender homophily in citations , 2017, Scientometrics.
[64] Fabian Zimmermann,et al. Is there a gender-based fragmentation of communication science? An investigation of the reasons for the apparent gender homophily in citations , 2017, Scientometrics.
[65] John P. Walsh,et al. Authorship Norms and Project Structures in Science , 2017 .
[66] Emanuel Kulczycki,et al. Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland , 2017, J. Informetrics.
[67] John O'Hagan,et al. Rise of multi-authored papers in economics: Demise of the ‘lone star’ and why? , 2017, Scientometrics.
[68] L. Leišytė,et al. Gender and Academic Work at a Dutch University , 2017 .
[69] M. Vaira,et al. Women’s Place in Academia: Case Studies of Italy and Switzerland , 2017 .
[70] Mathias Wullum Nielsen,et al. Gender inequality and research performance: moving beyond individual-meritocratic explanations of academic advancement , 2016 .
[71] Marco Tullney,et al. The Effect of Gender in the Publication Patterns in Mathematics , 2016, PloS one.
[72] Cornelius J. König,et al. Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists , 2016, Scientometrics.
[73] Carl T. Bergstrom,et al. Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time , 2016, ArXiv.
[74] A. Roberto,et al. Gender Roles: A Sociological Perspective , 2016, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.
[75] Cornelius J. König,et al. Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists , 2016, Scientometrics.
[76] Dorte Henriksen. The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013) , 2016, Scientometrics.
[77] U. Felt,et al. Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Scientists’ Work and Lives , 2016, Minerva.
[78] M. Kwiek. The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries , 2016 .
[79] Dorte Henriksen,et al. The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013) , 2016, Scientometrics.
[80] Vincent Larivière,et al. On the Compliance of Women Engineers with a Gendered Scientific System , 2015, PloS one.
[81] Vincent Larivière,et al. On the relationship between gender disparities in scholarly communication and country-level development indicators , 2015 .
[82] Ding-wei Huang. Temporal evolution of multi-author papers in basic sciences from 1960 to 2010 , 2015, Scientometrics.
[83] Peter van den Besselaar,et al. Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study , 2015, Scientometrics.
[84] Peter van den Besselaar,et al. Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[85] Kathrin Zippel,et al. Gendered patterns in international research collaborations in academia , 2015 .
[86] M. Kwiek. The Internationalization of Research in Europe , 2015 .
[87] Daniel B. Larremore,et al. Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks , 2015, Science Advances.
[88] Vincent Larivière,et al. Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[89] John A. List,et al. Do Competitive Workplaces Deter Female Workers? A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment on Job Entry Decisions , 2015 .
[90] M. Kwiek. Inequality in Academic Knowledge Production: The Role of Research Top Performers across Europe , 2015 .
[91] S. Ceci,et al. Women in Academic Science , 2014, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.
[92] Yuh-Shan Ho,et al. Bibliometric profile of top-cited single-author articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[93] Martha Kenney,et al. Agential Conversations: Interviewing Postdoctoral Life Scientists and the Politics of Mundane Research Practices , 2014 .
[94] J. Choi,et al. On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources , 2014 .
[95] Y. Benschop,et al. Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment , 2014 .
[96] Tim C. E. Engels,et al. Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000–2010) , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[97] Marjorie M. K. Hlava,et al. Publishing: Credit where credit is due , 2014, Nature.
[98] Erica Waagene,et al. Gender and Faculty Internationalization , 2014 .
[99] Fabrício Barreto Teresa,et al. Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): the trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers , 2014, Scientometrics.
[100] Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.
[101] Giovanni Abramo,et al. Gender differences in research collaboration , 2013, J. Informetrics.
[102] Barbara F. Walter,et al. The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations , 2013, International Organization.
[103] Nadine V. Kegen. Science Networks in Cutting-edge Research Institutions: Gender Homophily and Embeddedness in Formal and Informal Networks☆ , 2013 .
[104] Herman Aguinis,et al. Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers , 2013 .
[105] Anders U. Poulsen,et al. Gender Matching and Competitiveness: Experimental Evidence , 2013 .
[106] Carl T. Bergstrom,et al. The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship , 2012, PloS one.
[107] Daniel L. Fay,et al. Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art , 2013 .
[108] D. Barker. Global gender disparities in science , 2013 .
[109] Ruth Müller,et al. Collaborating in Life Science Research Groups: The Question of Authorship , 2012 .
[110] Jenessa R. Shapiro,et al. The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s Performance and Interest in STEM Fields , 2012 .
[111] Paula E. Stephan. How Economics Shapes Science , 2012 .
[112] Marie-Pierre Dargnies,et al. Men Too Sometimes Shy Away from Competition: The Case of Team Competition , 2011, Manag. Sci..
[113] Lucia dalla Pellegrina,et al. Evidence from Italy , 2012 .
[114] M. Finkelstein,et al. Conclusion: New Rules and Roles , 2012 .
[115] William K. Cummings,et al. Scholars in the Changing American Academy , 2012 .
[116] Jae Young Choi,et al. The determinants of research collaboration modes: exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship , 2011, Scientometrics.
[117] Heike Jons,et al. Transnational academic mobility and gender , 2011 .
[118] Vincent Larivière,et al. Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors , 2011, Scientometrics.
[119] Fredrik Niclas Piro,et al. Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[120] S. Ceci,et al. Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[121] José M. R. Murteira,et al. Alternative Estimating and Testing Empirical Strategies for Fractional Regression Models , 2011 .
[122] Giovanni Abramo,et al. The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research , 2011, Scientometrics.
[123] Mary K. Feeney,et al. Women in STEM networks: who seeks advice and support from women scientists? , 2010, Scientometrics.
[124] N. Vafeas,et al. Determinants of single authorship , 2010 .
[125] Vincent Larivière,et al. The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[126] L. Bornmann,et al. Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches , 2009 .
[127] Robert W. Rutledge,et al. Determinants of Coauthorship for the Most Productive Authors of Accounting Literature , 2009 .
[128] R. Simonsen. Credit where credit is due , 1995, Nature Cell Biology.
[129] Giovanni Abramo,et al. The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity , 2009, Scientometrics.
[130] Louise Ackers,et al. Internationalisation, Mobility and Metrics: A New Form of Indirect Discrimination? , 2008 .
[131] Christopher Baethge,et al. Publish together or perish: the increasing number of authors per article in academic journals is the consequence of a changing scientific culture. Some researchers define authorship quite loosely. , 2008, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.
[132] Jonathon N. Cummings,et al. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations , 2007 .
[133] Helmut A. Abt,et al. The future of single-authored papers , 2007, Scientometrics.
[134] Benjamin F. Jones,et al. Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .
[135] William E. Winkler,et al. Data quality and record linkage techniques , 2007 .
[136] Tim McNamara,et al. IBM SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation, 4th Edition , 2006 .
[137] Vincent Larivière,et al. Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities , 2006, Scientometrics.
[138] J. McDowell,et al. Two to Tango? Gender Differences in the Decisions to Publish and Coauthor , 2006 .
[139] Scott R. Hutson. Self-Citation in Archaeology: Age, Gender, Prestige, and the Self , 2006 .
[140] James W. Hughes,et al. Salary Structure Effects and the Gender Pay Gap in Academia , 2005 .
[141] Mary Frank Fox,et al. Book Review: Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes by Yu Xie and Kimberlee A. Shauman. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003 , 2003 .
[142] James Hartley,et al. Refereeing and the single author , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..
[143] Miriam Farber,et al. Single-authored publications in the sciences at Israeli universities , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..
[144] M. Bridgstock,et al. The quality of single and multiple authored papers; An unresolved problem , 1991, Scientometrics.
[145] P. Ivax,et al. A THEORY FOR RECORD LINKAGE , 2004 .
[146] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies , 2002, Libr. Trends.
[147] J. Miller,et al. Women Are Teachers, Men Are Professors: A Study of Student Perceptions. , 2000 .
[148] Peter J. Sloane,et al. Non-pecuniary Advantages Versus Pecuniary Disadvantages; Job Satisfaction Among Male And Female Academics In Scottish Universities , 2000 .
[149] R. K. Toutkoushian,et al. Faculty Time Allocations and Research Productivity: Gender, Race and Family Effects , 1999 .
[150] Nabil Amara,et al. The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research , 1998 .
[151] Francis T. Cullen,et al. How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article? Trends and Patterns in Political Science , 1998, PS: Political Science & Politics.
[152] Luke Georghiou,et al. Global cooperation in research , 1998 .
[153] John Hudson,et al. Trends in Multi-authored Papers in Economics , 1996 .
[154] James W. Endersby. Collaborative research in the social sciences : Multiple authorship and publication credit , 1996 .
[155] G. Holton,et al. Career Patterns of Women and Men in the Sciences , 1996 .
[156] B Rogers,et al. Gender Differences in Research , 1994, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.
[157] Leslie E. Papke,et al. Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates , 1993 .
[158] J. McDowell,et al. THE EFFECT OF GENDER‐SORTING ON PROPENSITY TO COAUTHOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACADEMIC PROMOTION , 1992 .
[159] S. Shapin,et al. “The Mind Is Its Own Place”: Science and Solitude in Seventeenth-Century England , 1991, Science in Context.
[160] William E. Winkler,et al. String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. , 1990 .
[161] Jonathan R. Cole,et al. Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community , 1987 .
[162] M. F. Fox. Location, Sex-Typing, and Salary among Academics , 1985 .
[163] A. Heffner. Authorship Recognition of Subordinates in Collaborative Research , 1979 .
[164] B. Latour,et al. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .
[165] R. Kanter. Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.
[166] R. Merton. The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.
[167] D. Price. Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .