Are female scientists less inclined to publish alone? The gender solo research gap

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Arthur Schram,et al.  Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work , 2015 .

[3]  M. Kwiek,et al.  Gender-Based Homophily in Research: A Large-Scale Study of Man-Woman Collaboration , 2020, J. Informetrics.

[4]  Traci Sitzmann,et al.  The Hidden Cost of Prayer: Religiosity and the Gender Wage Gap (Online Supplement) , 2020 .

[5]  M. F. Fox.  Gender, science, and academic rank: Key issues and approaches , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[6]  B. Jayabalasingham,et al.  The researcher journey through a gender lens , 2020 .

[7]  Troy A. Heffernan.  Academic networks and career trajectory: ‘There’s no career in academia without networks’ , 2020 .

[8]  João M. Santos,et al.  Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia , 2020 .

[9]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Task specialization across research careers , 2020, bioRxiv.

[10]  M. Kwiek.  The prestige economy of higher education journals: a quantitative approach , 2020 .

[11]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Comparison of research performance of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities , 2020, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Carlos Vílchez-Román,et al.  Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: a literature review , 2020, Social Psychology of Education.

[13]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource-poor system , 2020, Scientometrics.

[14]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: changing national patterns in global contexts , 2020, Studies in Higher Education.

[15]  Rima Wilkes,et al.  The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men’s) published research , 2020, PloS one.

[16]  M. Thelwall.  Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996–2014 , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[17]  Marzena Feldy,et al.  The Ethos of Science and the Perception of the Polish System of Financing Science , 2020, European Review.

[18]  M. Kwiek,et al.  Gender Disparities in International Research Collaboration: A Large-scale Bibliometric Study of 25, 000 University Professors , 2020, ArXiv.

[19]  M. Kwiek,et al.  GENDER DISPARITIES IN INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH COLLABORATION: A STUDY OF 25,000 UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS , 2020, Journal of Economic Surveys.

[20]  Emanuel Kulczycki,et al.  Breaking the deadlock of mistrust? A participative model of the structural reforms in higher education in Poland , 2020 .

[21]  Emanuel Kulczycki,et al.  Researchers publishing monographs are more productive and more local-oriented , 2020, Scientometrics.

[22]  G. Madison,et al.  Sex differences in the number of scientific publications and citations when attaining the rank of professor in Sweden , 2020, Studies in Higher Education.

[23]  Brian K. Ryu.  The Demise of Single-Authored Publications in Computer Science: A Citation Network Analysis , 2020, ArXiv.

[24]  David J. Samuels,et al.  Gender Gaps in Perceptions of Political Science Journals , 2019, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[25]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  M. Kwiek,et al.  Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Poland , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions.

[27]  Luis Sanz Menéndez,et al.  Grant Allocation Disparities from a Gender Perspective: Literature Review. Synthesis Report , 2020 .

[28]  K. A. Walker.  Females Are First Authors, Sole Authors, and Reviewers of Entomology Publications Significantly Less Often Than Males , 2019, Annals of the Entomological Society of America.

[29]  M. Shaw.  Strategic instrument or social institution: Rationalized myths of the university in stakeholder perceptions of higher education reform in Poland , 2019, International Journal of Educational Development.

[30]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Homophily, Biased Attention, and the Gender Gap in Science , 2019, Academy of Management Proceedings.

[31]  Ellen M. Key,et al.  You Research Like a Girl: Gendered Research Agendas and Their Implications , 2019, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[32]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Comparison of research productivity of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities , 2019, ArXiv.

[33]  D. Aksnes,et al.  Gender gaps in international research collaboration: a bibliometric approach , 2019, Scientometrics.

[34]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy , 2019, Scientometrics.

[35]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Gender differences in research areas, methods and topics: Can people and thing orientations explain the results? , 2019, J. Informetrics.

[36]  I-Jung Grace Lu.  Changing European Academics: A Comparative Study of Social Stratification, Work Patterns and Research Productivity , 2018, Higher Education Evaluation and Development.

[37]  Ted Enamorado,et al.  Using a Probabilistic Model to Assist Merging of Large-Scale Administrative Records , 2018, American Political Science Review.

[38]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Making it personal: Examining personalization patterns of single-authored papers , 2019, ISSI.

[39]  Gali Halevi,et al.  Bibliometric Studies on Gender Disparities in Science , 2019, Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators.

[40]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Man-woman collaboration behaviors and scientific visibility: does gender affect the academic impact in economics and management? , 2019, ISSI.

[41]  C. Macneil.  ‘One is the loneliest number’; are we witnessing the death throes of the single-author research paper in the field of biological invasions? , 2019, Management of Biological Invasions.

[42]  Carmel M. Diezmann,et al.  Women Professors , 2019 .

[43]  Aldona Tomczyńska,et al.  The Ethos of Science in Contemporary Poland , 2018, Minerva.

[44]  Marjo‐Riitta Diehl,et al.  Why women build less effective networks than men: The role of structural exclusion and personal hesitation , 2018, Human Relations.

[45]  Agnieszka Olechnicka,et al.  The Geography of Scientific Collaboration , 2018 .

[46]  Vetle I. Torvik,et al.  Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender , 2018, PloS one.

[47]  M. Kwiek.  Changing European Academics , 2018 .

[48]  L. Holman,et al.  Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences , 2018, bioRxiv.

[49]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  International Research Collaboration and International Research Orientation: Comparative Findings About European Academics , 2018 .

[50]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Science of Science , 2018, Science.

[51]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  Academic top earners. Research productivity, prestige generation, and salary patterns in European universities , 2018 .

[52]  Marek Kwiek,et al.  High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers? , 2018, Scientometrics.

[53]  Mohsen Jadidi,et al.  Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists , 2017, Adv. Complex Syst..

[54]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Selection committees for academic recruitment: does gender matter? , 2015, ArXiv.

[55]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Gender homophily in citations , 2018 .

[56]  Michael Bode,et al.  On the extinction of the single-authored paper : the causes and consequences of increasingly collaborative applied ecological research. , 2018 .

[57]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  International research collaboration among women engineers: frequency and perceived barriers, by regions , 2016, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[58]  Katherine Weisshaar,et al.  Publish and Perish?: An Assessment of Gender Gaps in Promotion to Tenure in Academia , 2017 .

[59]  Lauren A. Rivera.  When Two Bodies Are (Not) a Problem: Gender and Relationship Status Discrimination in Academic Hiring , 2017 .

[60]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact , 2017, PloS one.

[61]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Challenges in administrative data linkage for research , 2017, Big Data Soc..

[62]  Heather Sarsons,et al.  Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia , 2017 .

[63]  M. Potthoff,et al.  Is there a gender-based fragmentation of communication science? An investigation of the reasons for the apparent gender homophily in citations , 2017, Scientometrics.

[64]  Fabian Zimmermann,et al.  Is there a gender-based fragmentation of communication science? An investigation of the reasons for the apparent gender homophily in citations , 2017, Scientometrics.

[65]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Authorship Norms and Project Structures in Science , 2017 .

[66]  Emanuel Kulczycki,et al.  Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[67]  John O'Hagan,et al.  Rise of multi-authored papers in economics: Demise of the ‘lone star’ and why? , 2017, Scientometrics.

[68]  L. Leišytė,et al.  Gender and Academic Work at a Dutch University , 2017 .

[69]  M. Vaira,et al.  Women’s Place in Academia: Case Studies of Italy and Switzerland , 2017 .

[70]  Mathias Wullum Nielsen,et al.  Gender inequality and research performance: moving beyond individual-meritocratic explanations of academic advancement , 2016 .

[71]  Marco Tullney,et al.  The Effect of Gender in the Publication Patterns in Mathematics , 2016, PloS one.

[72]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists , 2016, Scientometrics.

[73]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time , 2016, ArXiv.

[74]  A. Roberto,et al.  Gender Roles: A Sociological Perspective , 2016, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[75]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists , 2016, Scientometrics.

[76]  Dorte Henriksen.  The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013) , 2016, Scientometrics.

[77]  U. Felt,et al.  Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Scientists’ Work and Lives , 2016, Minerva.

[78]  M. Kwiek.  The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries , 2016 .

[79]  Dorte Henriksen,et al.  The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013) , 2016, Scientometrics.

[80]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  On the Compliance of Women Engineers with a Gendered Scientific System , 2015, PloS one.

[81]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  On the relationship between gender disparities in scholarly communication and country-level development indicators , 2015 .

[82]  Ding-wei Huang.  Temporal evolution of multi-author papers in basic sciences from 1960 to 2010 , 2015, Scientometrics.

[83]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study , 2015, Scientometrics.

[84]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[85]  Kathrin Zippel,et al.  Gendered patterns in international research collaborations in academia , 2015 .

[86]  M. Kwiek.  The Internationalization of Research in Europe , 2015 .

[87]  Daniel B. Larremore,et al.  Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks , 2015, Science Advances.

[88]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[89]  John A. List,et al.  Do Competitive Workplaces Deter Female Workers? A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment on Job Entry Decisions , 2015 .

[90]  M. Kwiek.  Inequality in Academic Knowledge Production: The Role of Research Top Performers across Europe , 2015 .

[91]  S. Ceci,et al.  Women in Academic Science , 2014, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[92]  Yuh-Shan Ho,et al.  Bibliometric profile of top-cited single-author articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[93]  Martha Kenney,et al.  Agential Conversations: Interviewing Postdoctoral Life Scientists and the Politics of Mundane Research Practices , 2014 .

[94]  J. Choi,et al.  On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources , 2014 .

[95]  Y. Benschop,et al.  Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment , 2014 .

[96]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000–2010) , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[97]  Marjorie M. K. Hlava,et al.  Publishing: Credit where credit is due , 2014, Nature.

[98]  Erica Waagene,et al.  Gender and Faculty Internationalization , 2014 .

[99]  Fabrício Barreto Teresa,et al.  Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): the trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers , 2014, Scientometrics.

[100]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.

[101]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Gender differences in research collaboration , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[102]  Barbara F. Walter,et al.  The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations , 2013, International Organization.

[103]  Nadine V. Kegen.  Science Networks in Cutting-edge Research Institutions: Gender Homophily and Embeddedness in Formal and Informal Networks☆ , 2013 .

[104]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers , 2013 .

[105]  Anders U. Poulsen,et al.  Gender Matching and Competitiveness: Experimental Evidence , 2013 .

[106]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship , 2012, PloS one.

[107]  Daniel L. Fay,et al.  Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art , 2013 .

[108]  D. Barker.  Global gender disparities in science , 2013 .

[109]  Ruth Müller,et al.  Collaborating in Life Science Research Groups: The Question of Authorship , 2012 .

[110]  Jenessa R. Shapiro,et al.  The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s Performance and Interest in STEM Fields , 2012 .

[111]  Paula E. Stephan.  How Economics Shapes Science , 2012 .

[112]  Marie-Pierre Dargnies,et al.  Men Too Sometimes Shy Away from Competition: The Case of Team Competition , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[113]  Lucia dalla Pellegrina,et al.  Evidence from Italy , 2012 .

[114]  M. Finkelstein,et al.  Conclusion: New Rules and Roles , 2012 .

[115]  William K. Cummings,et al.  Scholars in the Changing American Academy , 2012 .

[116]  Jae Young Choi,et al.  The determinants of research collaboration modes: exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship , 2011, Scientometrics.

[117]  Heike Jons,et al.  Transnational academic mobility and gender , 2011 .

[118]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors , 2011, Scientometrics.

[119]  Fredrik Niclas Piro,et al.  Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[120]  S. Ceci,et al.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[121]  José M. R. Murteira,et al.  Alternative Estimating and Testing Empirical Strategies for Fractional Regression Models , 2011 .

[122]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research , 2011, Scientometrics.

[123]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Women in STEM networks: who seeks advice and support from women scientists? , 2010, Scientometrics.

[124]  N. Vafeas,et al.  Determinants of single authorship , 2010 .

[125]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[126]  L. Bornmann,et al.  Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches , 2009 .

[127]  Robert W. Rutledge,et al.  Determinants of Coauthorship for the Most Productive Authors of Accounting Literature , 2009 .

[128]  R. Simonsen.  Credit where credit is due , 1995, Nature Cell Biology.

[129]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity , 2009, Scientometrics.

[130]  Louise Ackers,et al.  Internationalisation, Mobility and Metrics: A New Form of Indirect Discrimination? , 2008 .

[131]  Christopher Baethge,et al.  Publish together or perish: the increasing number of authors per article in academic journals is the consequence of a changing scientific culture. Some researchers define authorship quite loosely. , 2008, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[132]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations , 2007 .

[133]  Helmut A. Abt,et al.  The future of single-authored papers , 2007, Scientometrics.

[134]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[135]  William E. Winkler,et al.  Data quality and record linkage techniques , 2007 .

[136]  Tim McNamara,et al.  IBM SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation, 4th Edition , 2006 .

[137]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities , 2006, Scientometrics.

[138]  J. McDowell,et al.  Two to Tango? Gender Differences in the Decisions to Publish and Coauthor , 2006 .

[139]  Scott R. Hutson.  Self-Citation in Archaeology: Age, Gender, Prestige, and the Self , 2006 .

[140]  James W. Hughes,et al.  Salary Structure Effects and the Gender Pay Gap in Academia , 2005 .

[141]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Book Review: Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes by Yu Xie and Kimberlee A. Shauman. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003 , 2003 .

[142]  James Hartley,et al.  Refereeing and the single author , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[143]  Miriam Farber,et al.  Single-authored publications in the sciences at Israeli universities , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[144]  M. Bridgstock,et al.  The quality of single and multiple authored papers; An unresolved problem , 1991, Scientometrics.

[145]  P. Ivax,et al.  A THEORY FOR RECORD LINKAGE , 2004 .

[146]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[147]  J. Miller,et al.  Women Are Teachers, Men Are Professors: A Study of Student Perceptions. , 2000 .

[148]  Peter J. Sloane,et al.  Non-pecuniary Advantages Versus Pecuniary Disadvantages; Job Satisfaction Among Male And Female Academics In Scottish Universities , 2000 .

[149]  R. K. Toutkoushian,et al.  Faculty Time Allocations and Research Productivity: Gender, Race and Family Effects , 1999 .

[150]  Nabil Amara,et al.  The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research , 1998 .

[151]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article? Trends and Patterns in Political Science , 1998, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[152]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Global cooperation in research , 1998 .

[153]  John Hudson,et al.  Trends in Multi-authored Papers in Economics , 1996 .

[154]  James W. Endersby.  Collaborative research in the social sciences : Multiple authorship and publication credit , 1996 .

[155]  G. Holton,et al.  Career Patterns of Women and Men in the Sciences , 1996 .

[156]  B Rogers,et al.  Gender Differences in Research , 1994, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[157]  Leslie E. Papke,et al.  Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates , 1993 .

[158]  J. McDowell,et al.  THE EFFECT OF GENDER‐SORTING ON PROPENSITY TO COAUTHOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACADEMIC PROMOTION , 1992 .

[159]  S. Shapin,et al.  “The Mind Is Its Own Place”: Science and Solitude in Seventeenth-Century England , 1991, Science in Context.

[160]  William E. Winkler,et al.  String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. , 1990 .

[161]  Jonathan R. Cole,et al.  Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community , 1987 .

[162]  M. F. Fox.  Location, Sex-Typing, and Salary among Academics , 1985 .

[163]  A. Heffner.  Authorship Recognition of Subordinates in Collaborative Research , 1979 .

[164]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[165]  R. Kanter.  Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[166]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[167]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .