Pretransplant Kinetics of Anti-HLA Antibodies in Patients on the Waiting List for Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND Patients on organ transplant waiting lists are evaluated for preexisting alloimmunity to minimize episodes of acute and chronic rejection by regularly monitoring for changes in alloimmune status. There are few studies on how alloimmunity changes over time in patients on kidney allograft waiting lists, and an apparent lack of research-based evidence supporting currently used monitoring intervals. METHODS To investigate the dynamics of alloimmune responses directed at HLA antigens, we retrospectively evaluated data on anti-HLA antibodies measured by the single-antigen bead assay from 627 waitlisted patients who subsequently received a kidney transplant at University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between 2008 and 2017. Our analysis focused on a filtered dataset comprising 467 patients who had at least two assay measurements. RESULTS Within the filtered dataset, we analyzed potential changes in mean fluorescence intensity values (reflecting bound anti-HLA antibodies) between consecutive measurements for individual patients in relation to the time interval between measurements. Using multiple approaches, we found no correlation between these two factors. However, when we stratified the dataset on the basis of documented previous immunizing events (transplant, pregnancy, or transfusion), we found significant differences in the magnitude of change in alloimmune status, especially among patients with a previous transplant versus patients without such a history. Further efforts to cluster patients according to statistical properties related to alloimmune status kinetics were unsuccessful, indicating considerable complexity in individual variability. CONCLUSIONS Alloimmune kinetics in patients on a kidney transplant waiting list do not appear to be related to the interval between measurements, but are instead associated with alloimmunization history. This suggests that an individualized strategy for alloimmune status monitoring may be preferable to currently used intervals.

[1]  M. Manook,et al.  Tracking HLA Antibody Changes among Kidney Waitlist Candidates: One Protocol May Not Fit All. , 2019, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[2]  J. Friedewald,et al.  Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk (STAR) 2017 Working Group Meeting Report , 2018, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[3]  M. Bots,et al.  Differential effects of donor‐specific HLA antibodies in living versus deceased donor transplant , 2018, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[4]  A. Chong,et al.  Evolving Approaches in the Identification of Allograft-Reactive T and B Cells in Mice and Humans , 2017, Transplantation.

[5]  J. Steiger,et al.  Donor Specificity but Not Broadness of Sensitization Is Associated With Antibody‐Mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Renal Allograft Recipients , 2017, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[6]  C. Napoli,et al.  Effect of Single Sensitization Event on Human Leukocyte Antigen Alloimmunization in Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Single-Center Experience. , 2017, Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation.

[7]  Y. Caliskan,et al.  Association Between HLA Antibodies and Different Sensitization Events in Renal Transplant Candidates. , 2017, Transplantation proceedings.

[8]  B. Tait Detection of HLA Antibodies in Organ Transplant Recipients – Triumphs and Challenges of the Solid Phase Bead Assay , 2016, Front. Immunol..

[9]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Adverse Outcomes of Tacrolimus Withdrawal in Immune-Quiescent Kidney Transplant Recipients. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[10]  Juan Carlos Fernández,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to identify highly autocorrelated areas: the case of spatial distribution in financially compromised farms , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[11]  P S Heeger,et al.  Comprehensive Assessment and Standardization of Solid Phase Multiplex‐Bead Arrays for the Detection of Antibodies to HLA , 2013, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[12]  J. Villard,et al.  De Novo Anti‐HLA Antibody After Pandemic H1N1 and Seasonal Influenza Immunization in Kidney Transplant Recipients , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[13]  M. Mihatsch,et al.  Risk stratification by the virtual crossmatch: a prospective study in 233 renal transplantations , 2011, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[14]  Dominique Charron,et al.  Preexisting donor-specific HLA antibodies predict outcome in kidney transplantation. , 2010, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[15]  D. Segev,et al.  Proinflammatory Events Are Associated with Significant Increases in Breadth and Strength of HLA‐Specific Antibody , 2009, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[16]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[17]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[18]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .