Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics

While learning and teaching difficulties in genetics have been abundantly explored and described, there has been less focus on the development and field-testing of strategies to address them. To inform the design of such a strategy a review study, focus group interviews with teachers, a case study of a traditional series of genetics lessons, student interviews, and content analysis of school genetics teaching were carried out. Specific difficulties reported in the literature were comparable to those perceived by Dutch teachers and found in the case study and the student interviews.The problems associated with the abstract and complex nature of genetics were studied in more detail. The separation of inheritance, reproduction and meiosis in the curriculum accounts for the abstract nature of genetics, while the different levels of biological organisation contribute to its complex nature. Finally, four design criteria are defined for a learning and teaching strategy to address these problems: linking the levels of organism, cell and molecule; explicitly connecting meiosis and inheritance; distinguishing the somatic and germ cell line in the context of the life cycle; and an active exploration of the relations between the levels of organisation by the students.

[1]  Jane Butler Kahle,et al.  An Investigation of High School Biology Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Difficulties in Genetics and Some Suggestions for Teaching Genetics. , 1985 .

[2]  J. Stewart,et al.  Secondary school genetics instruction: making problem solving explicit and meaningful , 1985 .

[3]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Revisiting learning difficulties in biology , 1999 .

[4]  M. Meehan General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications , 1969 .

[5]  John Leach,et al.  What's in a cell? — young people's understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an individual , 2000 .

[6]  Fred N. Finley,et al.  Teachers perceptions of important and difficult science content , 1982 .

[7]  Ann C. H. Kindfield Confusing chromosome number and structure: a common student error , 1991 .

[8]  Jenny M. Lewis,et al.  Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance - do students see any relationship? , 2000 .

[9]  John Leach,et al.  Chromosomes: the missing link — young people's understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation , 2000 .

[10]  Mike U. Smith Successful and unsuccessful problem solving in classical genetic pedigrees , 1988 .

[11]  James H. Stewart,et al.  Difficulties Experienced by High School Students when Learning Basic Mendelian Genetics. , 1982 .

[12]  C. R. Brown Some misconceptions in meiosis shown by students responding to an Advanced level practical examination question in biology , 1990 .

[13]  Problems with the use of terminology in genetics education: 2, some examples from published materials and suggestions for rectifying the problem , 1988 .

[14]  J. T. Pearson,et al.  Problems with the use of terminology in genetics education: 1, A literature review and classification scheme , 1988 .

[15]  Ann C. H. Kindfield Understanding a basic biological process: Expert and novice models of meiosis , 1994 .

[16]  M.C.P.J. Knippels,et al.  Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education : The yo-yo learning and teaching strategy , 2002 .

[17]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .