Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread - Part II: Ensemble Kalman Filter for the state estimation of a front-tracking simulator of wildfire spread

Abstract. This paper is the second part in a series of two articles, which aims at presenting a data-driven modeling strategy for forecasting wildfire spread scenarios based on the assimilation of the observed fire front location and on the sequential correction of model parameters or model state. This model relies on an estimation of the local rate of fire spread (ROS) as a function of environmental conditions based on Rothermel's semi-empirical formulation, in order to propagate the fire front with an Eulerian front-tracking simulator. In Part I, a data assimilation (DA) system based on an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) was implemented to provide a spatially uniform correction of biomass fuel and wind parameters and thereby, produce an improved forecast of the wildfire behavior (addressing uncertainties in the input parameters of the ROS model only). In Part II, the objective of the EnKF algorithm is to sequentially update the two-dimensional coordinates of the markers along the discretized fire front, in order to provide a spatially distributed correction of the fire front location and thereby, a more reliable initial condition for further model time-integration (addressing all sources of uncertainties in the ROS model). The resulting prototype data-driven wildfire spread simulator is first evaluated in a series of verification tests using synthetically generated observations; tests include representative cases with spatially varying biomass properties and temporally varying wind conditions. In order to properly account for uncertainties during the EnKF update step and to accurately represent error correlations along the fireline, it is shown that members of the EnKF ensemble must be generated through variations in estimates of the fire's initial location as well as through variations in the parameters of the ROS model. The performance of the prototype simulator based on state estimation (SE) or parameter estimation (PE) is then evaluated by comparison with data taken from a reduced-scale controlled grassland fire experiment. Results indicate that data-driven simulations are capable of correcting inaccurate predictions of the fire front location and of subsequently providing an optimized forecast of the wildfire behavior at future lead times. The complementary benefits of both PE and SE approaches, in terms of analysis and forecast performance, are also emphasized. In particular, it is found that the size of the assimilation window must be specified adequately with the persistence of the model initial condition and/or with the temporal and spatial variability of the environmental conditions in order to track sudden changes in wildfire behavior. The present prototype data-driven forecast system is still at an early stage of development. In this regard, this preliminary investigation provides valuable information on how to combine observations with a fire spread model in an efficient way, as well as guidelines to design the future system evolution in order to meet the operational requirements of wildfire spread monitoring.

[1]  G. Evensen,et al.  Analysis Scheme in the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 1998 .

[2]  Daniel Cariolle,et al.  Coupled Atmosphere‐Wildland Fire Modelling , 2009 .

[3]  C. E. Van Wagner,et al.  Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System , 1987 .

[4]  Philip J. Riggan,et al.  Chapter 6 Airborne Remote Sensing of Wildland Fires , 2008 .

[5]  Ian R. Noble,et al.  McArthur's fire-danger meters expressed as equations , 1980 .

[6]  R. Daley Atmospheric Data Analysis , 1991 .

[7]  J. Mandel,et al.  Coupled atmosphere-wildland fire modeling with WRF 3.3 and SFIRE 2011 , 2011, 1102.1343.

[8]  R. Burgan,et al.  1988 Revisions to the 1978 National Fire-Danger Rating System , 1988 .

[9]  A. Sullivan,et al.  Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models , 2007, 0706.4128.

[10]  Andrea Piacentini,et al.  The PALM Project: MPMD Paradigm for an Oceanic Data Assimilation Software , 1999, Euro-Par.

[11]  Arnaud Trouvé,et al.  Regional-scale simulations of wildland fire spread informed by real-time flame front observations , 2013 .

[12]  Jean Baptiste Filippi,et al.  A physical model for wildland fires , 2009 .

[13]  A. Piacentini,et al.  A new representation of data‐assimilation methods: The PALM flow‐charting approach , 2001 .

[14]  Olivier Pannekoucke,et al.  Background‐error correlation length‐scale estimates and their sampling statistics , 2008 .

[15]  David V. Sandberg,et al.  Reformulation of Rothermel's wildland fire behaviour model for heterogeneous fuelbeds. , 2007 .

[16]  David J. Murray-Smith,et al.  Real-Time Simulation , 1995 .

[17]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  A Method for Ensemble Wildland Fire Simulation , 2011 .

[18]  Y. Kaufman,et al.  Retrieval of biomass combustion rates and totals from fire radiative power observations: FRP derivation and calibration relationships between biomass consumption and fire radiative energy release , 2005 .

[19]  W. Mell,et al.  A physics-based approach to modelling grassland fires , 2007 .

[20]  Roberto Paoli,et al.  Data assimilation applied to combustion , 2013 .

[21]  Didier Lucor,et al.  Interactive comment on “Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread – Part I: Reduced-cost Ensemble Kalman Filter based on a Polynomial Chaos surrogate model for parameter estimation” , 2014 .

[22]  Arnaud Trouvé,et al.  A comparative study of parameter estimation and state estimation approaches in data-driven wildfire spread modeling , 2014 .

[23]  Gareth Roberts,et al.  Use of Handheld Thermal Imager Data for Airborne Mapping of Fire Radiative Power and Energy and Flame Front Rate of Spread , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Mélanie Catherine Rochoux Vers une meilleure prévision de la propagation d'incendies de forêt : évaluation de modèles et assimilation de données , 2014 .

[25]  Judith Winterkamp,et al.  Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC , 2002 .

[26]  Jonathan D. Beezley,et al.  A wildland fire model with data assimilation , 2007, Math. Comput. Simul..

[27]  J. Filippi,et al.  Assessment of ForeFire/Meso-NH for wildland fire/atmosphere coupled simulation of the FireFlux experiment , 2013 .

[28]  Didier Lucor,et al.  Towards predictive simulation of wildfire spread using a reduced-cost Ensemble Kalman Filter based on Polynomial Chaos approximation , 2012 .

[29]  M. Finney FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[30]  G. Roberts,et al.  Thermal Remote Sensing of Active Vegetation Fires and Biomass Burning Events , 2013 .

[31]  Samuel Buis,et al.  PALM: a computational framework for assembling high‐performance computing applications , 2006, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[32]  Jonathan D. Beezley,et al.  Real time simulation of 2007 Santa Ana fires , 2012, 1202.3209.

[33]  Patricia L. Andrews,et al.  Examination of the wind speed limit function in the Rothermel surface fire spread model , 2013 .

[34]  C. Chandler Forest fire behavior and effects , 1983 .

[35]  A. Sullivan A review of wildland fire spread modelling, 1990-present, 1: Physical and quasi-physical models , 2007, 0706.3074.

[36]  Philip J. Riggan,et al.  Airborne remote sensing of wildland fires , 2009 .

[37]  Jonathan D. Beezley,et al.  Morphing ensemble Kalman filters , 2007, ArXiv.

[38]  G. Mills,et al.  Australian fire weather as represented by the McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index and the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index , 2009 .

[39]  Craig C. Chandler,et al.  Fire in Forestry , 1991 .