Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Apatite-Wollastonite Ceramic Cage Design for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Model Study

Objectives Cage design and material properties play a crucial role in the long-term results, since interbody fusions using intervertebral cages have become one of the basic procedures in spinal surgery. Our aim is to design a novel Apatite-Wollastonite interbody fusion cage and evaluate its biomechanical behavior in silico in a segmental spinal model. Materials and Methods Mechanical properties for the Apatite-Wollastonite bioceramic cages were obtained by fitting finite element results to the experimental compression behavior of a cage prototype. The prototype was made from hydroxyapatite, pseudowollastonite, and frit by sintering. The elastic modulus of the material was found to be 32 GPa. Three intact lumbar vertebral segments were modelled with the ANSYS 12.0.1 software and this model was modified to simulate a Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Four cage designs in different geometries were analyzed in silico under axial loading, flexion, extension, and lateral bending. Results The K2 design had the best overall biomechanical performance for the loads considered. Maximum cage stress recorded was 36.7 MPa in compression after a flexion load, which was within the biomechanical limits of the cage. Conclusion Biomechanical analyses suggest that K2 bioceramic cage is an optimal design and reveals essential material properties for a stable interbody fusion.

[1]  Hideki Aoki,et al.  Mechanical properties of sintered hydroxyapatite for prosthetic applications , 1981 .

[2]  P Ducheyne,et al.  Bioactive glass particulate material as a filler for bone lesions. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[3]  J D Clausen,et al.  Finite element methods in spine biomechanics research. , 1995, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[4]  H. Oonishi,et al.  Quantitative rates of in vivo bone generation for Bioglass® and hydroxyapatite particles as bone graft substitute , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[5]  L. Lenke,et al.  Analysis of Titanium Mesh Cages in Adults With Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up , 2000, Spine.

[6]  Rui F. Silva,et al.  Si3N4-bioglass composites stimulate the proliferation of MG63 osteoblast-like cells and support the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow cells , 2002 .

[7]  S. Blumenthal,et al.  Intervertebral cages for degenerative spinal diseases. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[8]  M. Bosetti,et al.  The effect of bioactive glasses on bone marrow stromal cells differentiation. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[9]  A. Minami,et al.  A biomechanical and histological evaluation of a bioresorbable lumbar interbody fusion cage. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[10]  Zheng-Cheng Zhong,et al.  Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  Vijay K. Goel,et al.  Biomechanical Rationale for Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Spacers for Lumbar Interbody Fusion–A Finite Element Study , 2006, Spine.

[12]  S. Kurtz,et al.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[13]  Qing Hang Zhang,et al.  Finite element application in implant research for treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  S. Datta,et al.  Effects of bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass – Hydroxyapatite composite graft particles in the treatment of infrabony defects , 2012, Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology.