The association between socioeconomic status and disability after stroke: Findings from the Adherence eValuation After Ischemic stroke Longitudinal (AVAIL) registry

BackgroundStroke is the leading cause of disability among adults in the United States. The association of patients’ pre-event socioeconomic status (SES) with post-stroke disability is not well understood. We examined the association of three indicators of SES—educational attainment, working status, and perceived adequacy of household income—with disability 3-months following an acute ischemic stroke.MethodsWe conducted retrospective analyses of a prospective cohort of 1965 ischemic stroke patients who survived to 3 months in the Adherence eValuation After Ischemic stroke – Longitudinal (AVAIL) study. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relationship of level of education, pre-stroke work status, and perceived adequacy of household income with disability (defined as a modified Rankin Scale of 3–5 indicating activities of daily living limitations or constant care required).ResultsOverall, 58% of AVAIL stroke patients had a high school or less education, 61% were not working, and 27% perceived their household income as inadequate prior to their stroke. Thirty five percent of patients were disabled at 3-months. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, stroke survivors who were unemployed or homemakers, disabled and not-working, retired, less educated, or reported to have inadequate income prior to their stroke had a significantly higher odds of post-stroke disability.ConclusionsIn this cohort of stroke survivors, socioeconomic status was associated with disability following acute ischemic stroke. The results may have implications for public health and health service interventions targeting stroke survivors at risk of poor outcomes.

[1]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Quality of Care and Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Hospitalized With Ischemic Stroke: Findings From Get With the Guidelines–Stroke , 2010, Stroke.

[2]  G. Westert,et al.  Socioeconomic variations in the course of stroke: unequal health outcomes, equal care? , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[3]  C. Viscoli,et al.  Functional Recovery after Myocardial Infarction in Men: The Independent Effects of Social Class , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  A. Nederhof.  Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. , 1985 .

[5]  Koen Putman,et al.  Effect of socioeconomic status on functional and motor recovery after stroke: a European multicentre study , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[6]  E. Peterson,et al.  The Adherence eValuation After Ischemic Stroke Longitudinal (AVAIL) registry: design, rationale, and baseline patient characteristics. , 2009, American heart journal.

[7]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Representativeness of the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke Registry: Comparison of Patient and Hospital Characteristics Among Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With Ischemic Stroke , 2012, Stroke.

[8]  M. Metzler,et al.  Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. , 2005, JAMA.

[9]  F. Wolinsky,et al.  Clinically Relevant Levels of Depressive Symptoms in Community‐Dwelling Middle‐Aged African Americans , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  H. Wald,et al.  Quality of Care for In-Hospital Stroke: Analysis of a Statewide Registry , 2011, Stroke.

[11]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Race/Ethnicity, Quality of Care, and Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke , 2010, Circulation.

[12]  K. Labresh,et al.  Get with the guidelines. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  V. Salomaa,et al.  Socioeconomic Status and Ischemic Stroke: The FINMONICA Stroke Register , 2001, Stroke.

[14]  Li Liang,et al.  Get With the Guidelines–Stroke Is Associated With Sustained Improvement in Care for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack , 2009, Circulation.

[15]  Talicia Tarver,et al.  HEART DISEASE AND STROKE STATISTICS–2014 UPDATE: A REPORT FROM THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION , 2014 .

[16]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Quality of Care in Women With Ischemic Stroke in the GWTG Program , 2009, Stroke.

[17]  P. Duncan,et al.  Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials , 2000, Neuropharmacology.

[18]  M. Faouzi,et al.  Stroke initial severity and outcome relative to insurance status in a universal health care system in Switzerland , 2011, European journal of neurology.

[19]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Are Quality Improvements in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program Related to Better Care or Better Data Documentation? , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[20]  C. McKevitt,et al.  Socioeconomic Status and Stroke: An Updated Review , 2012, Stroke.

[21]  L. Schwamm,et al.  Hospital treatment of patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack using the "Get With The Guidelines" program. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  J. Saver,et al.  Years of Disability-Adjusted Life Gained as a Result of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2010, Stroke.

[23]  P. Heuschmann,et al.  Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Functional Impairment 3 Months After Ischemic Stroke: The Berlin Stroke Register , 2012, Stroke.