Changes in microbial heterotrophic diversity along five plant successional sequences

Abstract Little is known about the changes in microbial diversity associated with ecosystem development. We measured microbial heterotrophic evenness (a component of diversity) and other soil/humus properties (including basal respiration, substrate-induced respiration, pH, total C, N and P) at different stages in the development of five different ecosystems, with plant assemblages being used to define the phase in the successional sequence. Our objectives were to determine whether there were common patterns in establishment of microbial heterotrophic evenness with ecosystem development and whether changes in evenness were correlated to soil properties. Samples were collected from five sequences: Gisborne land slips (a chronosequence of re-vegetating landslip scars); Mount Tarawera (primary succession on aerially-deposited ash from a volcanic eruption); Rangitoto island (primary succession on a lava flow from a volcanic eruption); Franz Josef (primary succession initiated on gravels after the retreat of a glacier); and Swedish islands (a series of islands of differing size supporting different stages of plant succession). Heterotrophic diversity was measured using the catabolic response profile technique where CO2 efflux is measured during a 4-h incubation of samples amended with 25 different carbon substrates. Heterotrophic evenness was calculated from the CO2 responses using the Simpson–Yule index (maximum possible is 25). For Tarawera and Gisborne sequences, heterotrophic evenness was significantly lower at the first stage of succession (11.5 and 19.9, respectively), but subsequently plateaued, ranging between 21 and 23. Heterotrophic evenness declined significantly with succession at Rangitoto and Franz Josef sequences, but there was no trend along the Swedish island sequence. Despite the lack of a common pattern of heterotrophic evenness along all the sequences, there were significant linear correlations between heterotrophic evenness and basal respiration for Rangitoto (r=0.51, P

[1]  A. Hewitt New Zealand soil classification. , 1993 .

[2]  J. Frankland Fungal succession – unravelling the unpredictable , 1998 .

[3]  D. Wardle,et al.  The Influence of Island Area on Ecosystem Properties , 1997 .

[4]  Bruce D. Clarkson,et al.  Recent vegetation changes on Mount Tarawera, Rotorua, New Zealand , 1995 .

[5]  B. Degens,et al.  A sampling strategy to assess the effects of land use on microbial functional diversity in soils , 1999 .

[6]  Robert K. Peet,et al.  Plant succession : theory and prediction , 1993 .

[7]  N. Lupwayi,et al.  Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and crop rotation , 1998 .

[8]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology , 2000, Oecologia.

[9]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[10]  Eugene P. Odum,et al.  Trends Expected in Stressed Ecosystems , 1985 .

[11]  B. Degens Decreases in microbial functional diversity do not result in corresponding changes in decomposition under different moisture conditions , 1998 .

[12]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Below-ground microbial community development in a high temperature world. , 1999 .

[13]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances , 2000 .

[14]  D. Wardle,et al.  A critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development , 1995 .

[15]  M. Mcleod,et al.  VEGETATION AND SOIL RECOVERY ON SHALLOW LANDSLIDE SCARS IN TERTIARY HILL COUNTRY, EAST CAPE REGION, NEW ZEALAND , 1997 .

[16]  L. Schipper,et al.  Decreases in organic C reserves in soils can reduce the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities , 2000 .

[17]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[18]  G. Sparling,et al.  Estimation of soil microbial c by a fumigation-extraction method: use on soils of high organic matter content, and a reassessment of the kec-factor , 1990 .

[19]  J. Trappe,et al.  Ecosystem properties and microbial community changes in primary succession on a glacier forefront , 1999, Oecologia.

[20]  L. Schipper,et al.  Is the microbial community in a soil with reduced catabolic diversity less resistant to stress or disturbance , 2001 .

[21]  Jacques Roy,et al.  How important are species richness, species evenness and interspecific differences to productivity? A mathematical model , 2000 .

[22]  A. Magurran Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[23]  D. Wardle,et al.  The regulation and functional significance of soil biodiversity in agroecosystems. , 1999 .

[24]  Catherine Potvin,et al.  BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: IMPORTANCE OF SPECIES EVENNESS IN AN OLD FIELD , 2000 .

[25]  B. Degens,et al.  Development of a physiological approach to measuring the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities , 1997 .

[26]  B. Degens Catabolic response profiles differ between microorganisms grown in soils , 1999 .

[27]  N. Maire,et al.  Organic matter cycling in grassland soils of the Swiss Jura mountains: biodiversity and strategies of the living communities , 1999 .

[28]  L. Walker,et al.  Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground , 1999 .

[29]  M. Willig,et al.  Functional diversity of microbial communities: A quantitative approach , 1994 .

[30]  Ken E. Giller,et al.  Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function , 1997 .

[31]  L. Blakemore Methods for chemical analysis of soils , 1972 .