Effect of nanoparticle size and size‐distribution on mechanical behavior of filled amorphous thermoplastic polymers

Different types of polymer nanocomposites on the base of polystyrene, polymethylmethacrylate, and polycarbonate with alumina and SiO2 nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes have been studied. Miniaturized, microdimensional samples were used, enabling a good control of morphology and distribution of particles by means of transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Special preparation techniques had been applied, which resulted in a very good dispersion of the nanoparticles. Using these materials with really nanosized particles of a few 10nm in size the effect on toughness enhancement could be studied without agglomerates as they often appear in the generally used large samples. Micromechanical mechanisms were studied in detail by TEM and SEM investigations of deformed samples. A “nanoparticle modulated crazing” could be detected as a toughness enhancing effect. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007

[1]  J. Coleman,et al.  Small but strong: A review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube–polymer composites , 2006 .

[2]  G. Michler,et al.  Indentation Fracture Mechanics for Toughness Assessment of PMMA/SiO2 Nanocomposites , 2006 .

[3]  G. Michler,et al.  Relationships between phase morphology and deformation mechanisms in polymer nanocomposite nanofibres prepared by an electrospinning process , 2006, Nanotechnology.

[4]  I. Ward,et al.  The incorporation of carbon nanofibres to enhance the properties of self reinforced, single polymer composites , 2005 .

[5]  G. Michler,et al.  Deformation processes of ultrahigh porous multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polycarbonate composite fibers prepared by electrospinning , 2005 .

[6]  G. Michler,et al.  The Mechanical Deformation Process of Electrospun Polymer Nanocomposite Fibers , 2005 .

[7]  Rémy Dendievel,et al.  Nanocomposites base polym?re, renforc?s par des particules rigides , 2004 .

[8]  I. Ward,et al.  The science and technology of hot compaction , 2004 .

[9]  G. Michler,et al.  Morphology and micromechanical deformation behavior of styrene/butadiene‐block copolymers. I. Toughening mechanisms in asymmetric star block copolymers , 2002 .

[10]  Thomas J. Pinnavaia,et al.  Polymer-clay nanocomposites , 2000 .

[11]  A. Argon,et al.  Toughness mechanism in semi-crystalline polymer blends: I. High-density polyethylene toughened with rubbers , 1999 .

[12]  Robert E. Cohen,et al.  Toughness mechanism in semi-crystalline polymer blends: II. High-density polyethylene toughened with calcium carbonate filler particles , 1999 .

[13]  G. Michler,et al.  Micromechanical deformation processes in toughened and particle-filled semicrystalline polymers: Part 1. Characterization of deformation processes in dependence on phase morphology , 1998 .

[14]  A. Kinloch,et al.  Predictive modelling of the properties and toughness of rubber-toughened epoxies , 1996 .

[15]  C. Fond,et al.  Volume change and light scattering during mechanical damage in polymethylmethacrylate toughened with core-shell rubber particles , 1996, Journal of Materials Science.

[16]  L. Nicolais,et al.  A method for the preparation of PMMA-SiO2 nanocomposites with high homogeneity , 1996 .

[17]  H. Meijer,et al.  Deformation and toughness of polymeric systems: 5. A critical examination of multilayered structures , 1994 .

[18]  E. Kramer,et al.  Fundamental processes of craze growth and fracture , 1990 .

[19]  D. Dorset.  Sectorization of n-paraffin crystals , 1986 .

[20]  Souheng Wu.  Phase structure and adhesion in polymer blends: a criterion for rubber toughening , 1985 .

[21]  H. K. V. Schmeling,et al.  Behavior of elastic networks of various degrees of orientation in the kinetic theory of fracture. , 1968 .

[22]  C. Hsiao.  Theory of Mechanical Breakdown and Molecular Orientation of a Model Linear High‐Polymer Solid , 1959 .