Learners of a New Generation

To identify educational practices that will best facilitate the development of expertise, we must first understand the learner. Student cohorts in post K-12 education are generally composed of learners from multiple generations. Learning cohorts from previous generations who were accustomed to a limited range of educational resources acclimated to learning through primarily aural and read/write modalities. The educational environment for millennial generation learners has been dominated by technology. As a result a variety of learning styles, not apparent in previous generations, have become common. These learning styles are incidental to novel resources to which learners now have access. Strategies designed to promote successful knowledge acquisition for learners of any style should incorporate a variety of the ever-increasing array of available innovative educational paradigms and digital resources. In addition to resources, other factors that should be considered in the design of strategies which can influence the success of next generation learning include their (1) tendency to learn via real-world applications, (2) unfamiliarity with educational technology, (3) weakness in information literacy, (4) need for frequent feedback, and (5) predilection to work in teams. A multifactorial approach to facilitate the development of expertise will best support individual scholarly effort and preparation for lifelong learning.

[1]  Will Richardson,et al.  Personal Learning Networks , 2011 .

[2]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[4]  C. S. Green,et al.  The development of attention skills in action video game players , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Angela M. Weiler Information-seeking behavior in Generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory , 2005 .

[6]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[8]  J. Twenge Generational changes and their impact in the classroom: teaching Generation Me , 2009, Medical education.

[9]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[10]  Paige E. Scalf,et al.  Training-induced functional activation changes in dual-task processing: an FMRI study. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Lindsay Fullerton,et al.  Trust Online: Young Adults' Evaluation of Web Content , 2010 .

[12]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[13]  R. H. Dalaqua University College, London , 1910, Nature.

[14]  M. Prensky H. Sapiens Digital: From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom , 2009 .

[15]  P. Ozuah First, There Was Pedagogy And Then Came Andragogy , 2016 .

[16]  N. Howe,et al.  Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069 , 1991 .

[17]  Diana G. Oblinger Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the "New Students.". , 2003 .

[18]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Cognitive control in media multitaskers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[20]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[21]  Neil D. Fleming,et al.  Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection , 1992 .

[22]  Ilana Gershon,et al.  The Breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over New Media , 2010 .

[23]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Retrieval Mode Distinguishes the Testing Effect from the Generation Effect. , 2010 .

[24]  C Shawn Green,et al.  Increasing Speed of Processing With Action Video Games , 2009, Current directions in psychological science.

[25]  D. Strayer,et al.  Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  R M Harden,et al.  AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 5-From competency to meta-competency: a model for the specification of learning outcomes. , 1999, Medical teacher.

[27]  F. Coffield Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review , 2004 .

[28]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[29]  Amy Driscoll,et al.  Developing Outcomes-Based Assessment for Learner-Centered Education , 2007 .

[30]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[31]  David M. Considine,et al.  Teaching and Reaching the Millennial Generation through Media Literacy , 2009 .

[32]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[33]  Camille DiLullo,et al.  Clinical competencies and the basic sciences: An online case tutorial paradigm for delivery of integrated clinical and basic science content , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[34]  Tony Young How valid and useful is the notion of learning style? A multicultural investigation , 2010 .