How Do Task Characteristics Affect the Transitions Between Seated and Standing Reaches?

In 3 experiments, we examined the effects of task characteristics on the selection of a reach action (mode) when several alternatives are afforded. In the bead pickup task, actors had to skewer a 2-mm bead using a sewing needle. Performing this task entailed significant postural control and visual requirements. The block pickup task involved picking up a 3-cm Lego(r) block using a 2-finger grip, which entailed minimal postural and visual demands. In Experiment 1, as reach distance increased, actors performing the bead task consistently changed to reach modes that afforded greater postural stability at closer distances than they did for the block task. Also, during the bead task actors avoided the partial standing reach mode from which it was difficult to maintain the postural control required to complete the bead task. Mode avoidance was not observed for the block task. Experiment 2 showed that actors changed reach modes at distances at which the relative comfort of 2 reach modes changed. The outcome of Experiment 3 indicated that the selection of action mode, including mode avoidance, was associated more closely with the postural demands of the task than visual requirements. The outcome of this investigation indicates that people choose actions that effect the necessary postural control required to complete the task.

[1]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  H. B. Falls,et al.  Energy cost of running and walking in young women. , 1976, Medicine and science in sports.

[3]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses , 1981, Nature.

[4]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  K. Newell Coordination, Control and Skill , 1985 .

[6]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. J. Dainoff,et al.  Task and the adjustment of ergonomic chairs , 1987 .

[9]  L S Mark,et al.  A biodynamic basis for perceived categories of action: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visually perceiving what is reachable. , 1989 .

[11]  K. Newell,et al.  Body scale and the development of prehension. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[12]  J. Konczak,et al.  Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Heft Harry,et al.  A Methodological Note on Overestimates of Reaching Distance: Distinguishing Between Perceptual and Analytical Judgments , 1993 .

[14]  A Hreljac,et al.  Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  L S Mark,et al.  The effect of gap depth on the perception of whether a gap is crossable , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  L S Mark,et al.  Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  K. Newell,et al.  Metabolic energy expenditure and the regulation of movement economy , 1998 .

[20]  Marvin J. Dainoff,et al.  Scaling problems in the design of work spaces for human use , 1999 .

[21]  K. Newell,et al.  The scaling of human grip configurations. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.